HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1957-01-08 15
MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING
OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
On January 8, 1957 the above meeting was held by the City PlanningCommission
of the City of Livonia at the City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia,
Michigan. Vice-Chairman H. Paul Harsha called the Public Hearing to order at
approximately 8:06 p.m.
Members present: Robert L. Greene Wilfred Okerstrom Charles Walker
Karle Steinhoff Leonard Kane *H. Paul Harsha
Fred A. Lotz Robert L. Miller
Members absent: William R. Robinson
Lieutenant Bob Perry, Livonia Fire Department and Charles Pinto, Asst. City
Attorney were present together with approximately 35 people attending the Public
Hearing.
The secretary announced that the first item on the agenda was the proposed
Spring Valley Subdivision located on the North side of Seven Mile Road between
Merriman and Hubbard Roads in the East 1/2 of Section 3. Mr. James L. Johnson
was present.
The Chair announced that at the last meeting, December 18, 1956 in addition
to the five items listed in resolution, the Commission also questioned the
proposed set back of homes on Seven Mile Road compared to existing set back
and how excepted parcel of land was to be used.
The secretary read letters dated January 3, 1957 from Calvin Roberts, Chief
Livonia Fire Department; dated January 4, 1957 and December 27, 1956 from
R. McCary, City Engineer and Dave Meinzinger, Director of Public Works and
dated January 4, 1957 from Donald Wilson, Chief Inspector.
Mr. Harsha stated that in addition to those lots mentioned in letter from the
Chief Inspector as being undersized he would include Lots 160, 448 and 486.
Believed Lots 474 through 482 are located in a natural flood plain and from
the layout as shown on revised plat, it will require fill to bring lots up to
at least 45° slope and what that would do would be a serious question. Even
if the Commission would allow this, the County officials might object as
petitioner would be interfering with the natural drainage.
Mr. Lotz referred to Lots 517, 537 and 550 as being undersized. Also the jog
is a traffic hazard that might better be a rounded corner. Referred to Lots
534 through 558 as possibly shedding water onto adjacent property. Condition
occurred near the corner of Middlebelt and Joy Roads. Did not feel Commission
had the right to approve something that will interfere with area drainage.
Mr. Harsha stated Commission has no way of telling whether proposed subdivision
will flood adjoining property owners inasmuch as Commission does not have
finished grade of subdivision.
Mr. Johnson stated the drainage is to be diverted to the Tarabusi Drain. There
is a drain over the back of the excepted parcel and the abstract calls for an
outlet for that drain. The drain is being diverted and an outlet will be
provided as far as the outlet is concerned. The engineering plan will show
the finished grade which is subject to approval of the community.
Mr. Harsha stated Commission has province to pass on engineering plans and it
would be good to have them. Another thing was the future development of
adjoining property. Nothing is shown as to what use is to be made of outlot
of parcel. Commission has to know what is going to happen to outlot. Believed
petitioner was going to have a meeting with the adjoining property owners.
Asked whether such a meeting was held.
Mr. Johnson stated a meeting was not held. Did discuss plat after the meeting
December 18, 1956. Many of the suggestions at that time were felt to be
impractical; therefore plan was not changed and did not t?-ink it was necessary
to contact adjoining property owners.
Mr. Lotz stated he mentioned at the last meeting that there should be a road
along the excepted parcel which petitioner has done but there is still a row of
homes on the East side of road. Petitioner has cut off any acces s residents
might have to use the back portion of their property.
Mr. Johnson stated as he remembers it, one of the property owners objected to
the road running along the excepted parcel. Mr. Lotz stated he did not believe
that was true.
Mr. Harsha referred to Article r, Section 4.02 (a) and 4.08, Subdivision
Rules and Regulations.
Mr. Greene referred to area map and stated that as far as he could see there
is still no provision for access to school property which was requested by the
Board. Read again letter dated Decemberl7, 1956 from Benton Yates, Supt.,
Livonia Public Schools.
Mr. Johnson referred to letter dated January 2, 1957 from himself directed to
Commission when revised plat was filed. Believed that he requested that the
subdivision plat be accepted with the condition that outlet of sufficient
capacity at points in this subdivision nearest the school site be provided.
Informed Commission that he is in the process of obtaining the right—of—way on
which the two streets are shown. Until the right—of—way has been secured could
not commit himself. Mr. Greene stated that until petitioner does commit him—
self, could not see how Commission could approve plat.
Mr. Lotz stated petitioner is still going to back the houses onto Seven Mile
Road with a mere 401 set back. Suggested at the last meeting that a few of
the homes be built at a parallel and petitioner stated that it could be done.
Mr. Johnson stated that they discussed this with Land Planner. Recalled
Commission's suggestion but the homes have been turned to face the intersect—
ing street.
Mr. Lotz stated in his opinion turning the lots does not alleviate the
situation. This is one of the nicer sections on Seven Mile Road.
Mr. Johnson asked how much set back the Commission wanted. Mr. Lotz stated
existing homes set back 237/. Didn't say petitioner would have to go back that
155
far, just as far as necedsary so that adjoining residents could see. There
are no other homes on Seven Mile Road siding to Seven Mile Road as shown on
revised plat.
Mr. Johnson stated he attempted to purchase additional land but was not able
to. Felt something could be worked out regarding Northwest corner of Seven
Mile and Merriman Roads. Mr. Lotz suggested contacting residents again.
Mr. Johnson asked whether Commission referred to a North-South or East-West
street. Mr. Lotz suggested East-West street in that that would alleviate
situation whereby residentF could use back portion of their property.
Suggested homes along Seven Mile Road and this area be such that they would not
place existing homes in a pocket.
Mr. Harsha stated an East-West street would run 150' back so that houses would
back up against the proposed homes on Gable Avenue. Petitioner would have to
buy the back end of the property which Commission cannot force him to do but
if he were to give access to Auburndale Avenue by a road down from the back
end of these lots from the intersection of Auburndale Avenue andttake out one
lot, it might work out to everyones advantage.
Mr. Johnson asked whether plan meets with Commission's approval other than the
excepted parcel and possible access to it. Stated that as far as furnishing
sanitary sewer outlet to school site, plat could the approved subject to
furnishing outlet and acquiring right-of-way. Mr. Harsha asked how long it
will be before right-of-way will be acquired. Mr. Johnson stated that that is
impossible to say but that they will take immediate steps. Mr. Harsha asked
whether it would be before canvas back plat is submitted to Commission.
Mr. Johnson stated it would.
Mr. Lotz asked size of outlet and what it will connect with. Mr. Johnson stated
it will be whatever is sufficient capacity as determined by the engineers.
Mr. Lotz asked whether petitioner considered 15" sewer adequate to take care of
554 homes and school. Mr. Johnson stated he could not answer that question.
Mr. Greene stated letter from City Engineer states sewer is adequate for the
subdivision. Wondered if City Engineer was considering Thool as wellas sub-
division.
The secretary reread letter dated December 27, 1956 from W. R. McCary, Engineer
and Dave Meinzinger, Director of Public Works.
Mr. Harsha stated City Engineer does not commit himself about the school.
Mr. Greene stated it would be very embarrassing to get this all in and then
find out it is notadequate for t he school. Mr. Harsha stated that that is
true but that petitioner has appeared before Commission before and this is the
second hearing on proposed subdivision.
Nine interested residents were present objecting to plat as presented.
Mr. George Harmon, 31670 Seven Mile Road stated if East-West street were cut
through excluded area, there would be 27 more homes constructed. As it is,
residents are not in a position to dispose of property. Also if petitioner
1554 ima
raised the grade of his property 2', about 200' of our property will have
water flowing back onto it. Like to know what petitioner intends to do with
excepted area. Suggested petitioner sit down with residents and that some—
thing might be worked out. Discussed proposed subdivision after meeting
December 18, 1956 and petitioner stated he would revise plat, call me and
furnish me with a copy of the revised plat. First residents knew of hearing
tonight was last night.
Mr. Johnson stated that there was no agreement made. Mr. Harmon stated
Mr. Johnson took his number both at work and home and that he was told he would
be contacted.
Mr. Johnson stated it was said that he would be contacted in the event the
suggestions of the residents were adopted. Mr. Harmon stated Mr. Johnson took
measurements of the exi-ting homes and stated he could see no reason why it
couldn't work out and everyone went home happy.
Mr. Jacob Breitenbach, 31750 Seven Mile Road asked the Commissioners to place
themselves in his spot in the way this proposed plat is laid out. Would
Commissioner-- like to look at six back yards everytime they looked out their
window. Existing residents are going to get all the drainage from these back
yards. As stated by Mr. Harmon, Mr. Johnson agreed to furnish residents with
a copy of revised plat and Mr. Johnson thought suggestions as made could be
worked out. Stated regarding Mr. Johnson's statement regarding one of the
property owners objecting to road running along the excepted parcel, he would
much rather have a street than the back yards of homes. Also objected tot
back as shown on revised plat.
Mr. W. Louis Boyington, 31700 Seven Mile Road stated he concurs with remarks
as made by Mr. Harmon. It was suggested before that the homes along Seven
Mile Road be staggered to conform with set back of existing homes. Feel
residents are entitled to this incrder to maintain value of exiting homes.
Also homes should be facing Seven Mile Road rather than siding as shown on
revised plat.
Mr. Greene asked Mr. J hnson rt ether he was willing to meet with people in area.
Mr. Johnson stated he was.
Mr. Greene asked Mr. Johnson whether he was willing to have Commission table
proposed plat in order to give him an opportunity to meet with people.
Mr. Pinto reminded Commissioners of M.S.A. 5.3005 in which statute Commission
has to either approve or deny proposed plat within 60 days or else petitioner
can demand approval. Thought Commission should keep this fact in mind in
considering whether or not item should be tabled.
Mr. Greene asked whether Mr. Pinto is suggesting that Commission ask
petitioner to waive 60 day limitation. Mr. Pinto stated Commission should
approve plat, deny plat or ask for waiver.
Mr. Greene asked Mr. Johnson if he would be willing to waive 60 days limitation.
Mr. Johnson stated that under the circumstances he would expressly waive 60 day
period during which plat must be either approved or denied.
155$5
Mr. Greene suggested that if two lots are combined (Lots located on either
side of Auburndale and Osmus Avenues) there would be a depth of 150' which
would permit a nice set back.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Greene, seconded by Mr. Lotz and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-1-57 RESOLVED that, the proprietor, Mr. James L. Johnson, having
expressly waived the 60 day statuatory period contained in
, M.S.A. 5.3005 the City Planning'Comrriission does hereby table
the proposed Spring Valley Subdivision located on the North
side of Seven Mile Road between Merriman and Hubbard Roads
in the East 1/2 of Section 3 toafford petitioner an opportunity
to meet with residents who are concerned and work out a
solution to their problems as well as to provide an opportunity
to clarify one or two points, specifically, (1) Lots located in
natural flood plain; (2) Lots 517 and 550 being rounded off;
(3) 'larifying the matter of rliether or not the sanitary and
storm sewer will be adequate to take care of both the proposed
subdivision and the proposed school; (4) Fronting homes on
Seven Mile Road and (5) Undersized lots.
The Vice-Chairman declared the foregoing resolution adopted and called a recess
at approximately 9:10 p.m.
The meeting w as called to order at approximately 9:24 p.m. with all present
as named at the beginning and during the course of the meeting except
Karle Steinhoff and Charles Walker who returned later.
The secretary announced that the next item on the agenda was Application TA21
by Harold H. Gordon, Alby Development Company requesting permission to remove
topsoil situated on the North 1/2 of Parcel 24BB located South of proposed
Lyndon Street, North of Schoolcraft Road, between Middlebelt Road and Slavik's
Buckingham Village Subdivision in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24.
Messr. Harold Gordon and Louis Begin wsre present.
Messrs. Karle Steinhoff and Charles Walker returned to meeting at approximately
9:25 p.m.
Mr. Pinto informed Commission that inasmuch as he was out of the City today,
he had not had an opportunity to write opinion as requested by Mr. Walkers
He did however, have an opportunity to discuss matter with Mr. Walker and
thought the question had been cleared.
Mr. Walker stated newly submitted topographic survey shows that there is top-
soil to be removed. Suggested that in removing dirt, if application is
granted, that petitioner keep in mind that thedrain as shown on survey, must
be kept open and clean. Stated there is a piece of land West of area that had
dirt removed sometime ago. At that time some dirt was put back although he
understood that petitioner has taken some of this dirt off of that area.
Thought that should be considered and that Commission include that petitioner
is to bring that particular piece to grade level.
150 Ione
Mr. Gordon stated that they own parcel in ouestion and that altogether they C`5
own approximately 100 acres. Have been bringing area up to grade as they go
along. The topsoil has been stockpiled.
Mr. Kane asked whether he is correct in that survey shows finished grade.
Mr. Gordon stated that that is true.
Mr. Harsha referred to Section 4.04 and 4.13, Zoning Ordinance, No. 60.
Wondered whether Commission is etting too generous in letting applicants
go a little low on removals. Passed property over the week end and noticed a
number of children skating on a pond directly to the North of parcel. If
there is a pond on property, there is something wrong with the property.
Mr. Gordon stated that the dirt is not on the property and that the pond and
holes occur on the property mentioned by Mr. Walker.
Mr. Miller asked whether petitioner intends to build on property. Mr. Gordon
stated they are and that they will be starting with the Belle-Lynn Subdivision
in two weeks and continuing onto this property.
No one was present objecting to petition as presented.
Mr. Lotz asked whether petitioner intends to bring property up to grade.
Mr. Gordon stated he did.
Mr. Walker asked whether Commission had letter from the Police Department.
The secretary read letters dated December 3, 1956 from Dallas F. Hay, Police
Commissioner and from Patrolman William Newstead addressed to Police
Commissioner Hay.
Mr. Harsha referred to portion of Section 4.13, Zoning Ordinance, No. 60 and
stated that to the best of his knowledge the building grade is the grade at the
building which is a minimum of 1' above the nearest sidewalk andoould be at
least 15" or 16" above crown of street. Asked whether petitioners intended
to have homes on Middlebelt Road. Mr. Begin stated they did not.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Kane, it was
#1-2-57 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
December 4, 1956 the City Planning Commission does hereby
grant Application TA21 by Harold H. Gordon, Alby Development
Company requesting permission to remove topsoil on the North
1/2 of Parcel 24BB located South of proposed Lyndon Street,
North of Schoolcraft Road, between Middlebelt Road and
Slavik's Buckingham Village Subdivision in the Southwest 1/4
of Section 24, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a performance bond be fixed on the above
application at $10,000 and it is recommended to the Bureau of
Inspection that a permit to this effect be issued, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to the
property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Depart-
ments as listed in the Proof of Service and recommendations
having been obtained from the Department of Public Works under
1560 7
date of December 4, 1956 and from the Police Department under
date of December 3, 1956.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Greene, Okerstrom, Kane, Walker, Harsha and Miller
NAYS: Steinhoff and Lotz
The secretary announced that the next item on the agenda was Petition M-36 by
Michael J. Caffery requesting permission to erect a gasoline service station
on Parcels 01FF1 and 01FF2GG located on the Northwest corner of Seven Mile
and Angling Roads in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 1. The secretary read letter
dated December 26, ln56 from Calvin Roberts, Chief Livonia Fire Department.
Mr. Michael J. Caffery was present.
Mr. Caffery stated that after the widing of Seven Mile Road the parcel will be
only 108' deep (buildable property after house is removed) .
Mr. Steinhoff asked whether petitioner is going to provide greenbelt.
Mr. Caffery stated they will provide at least a 10' greenbelt and a fence.
Mr. Greene asked whether Commission usually had plot plan showing ingress and
egress and location of pumps. It was ascertained that in most instances the
Commission did have such a plot plan.
Mr. Richard Lefeibre, 19111 Angling Road stated already there are three gas
stations in the immediate area and that in his opinion three stations in a
half mile is sufficient. There is noise and fumes and did not think it would
help value of property at all. There are other types of businesses that can
go in there. Discussed the possibility of alley being cut through back of
property.
Mr. Caffery stated he did not know anything about alley.
Mr. Lefeibre stated Commission has to consider alley in its thinking inasmuch
as property to the West is to be used for business.
Mr. Harsha stated Mr. Lefeibre has a point in that there should be an alley
behind business property.
Mr. James Pollock, 28050 Seven Mile goad stated if alley is cut through area,
it will go through his existing garage.
Mr. Caffery stated that the building as shown on submitted sketch will be
placed at an angle rather than as shown.
Mr. Greene stated Commission likes to have on file something showing ingress,
egress and location of pumps.
Mr. Lotz stated that building will face Seven Mile Road and that access will be
from main and side streets. Makes no difference which way building faces.
a
15
IINNAba
Mr. Caffery drew in sketch proposed locations of pumps, ingress and egress as
required. Stated proposed station is to be a neighborhood station and not a
major 24 hour station.
Mr. Greene asked whether Commissioners felt they should consider matter of the
alley at this time or whether it should be deferred. Mr. Harsha stated that
whether commission can have petitioner put alley through their own property is
a question. It will work hardship on the adjacent property owner. There is
no question Commission can insist on their putting an alley behind business
property.
Mr. Pinto stated generally speaking, in a zoning matter, Commission is con-
fined to the situation a s it exists at the time the decision is being made.
Sometimes that may appear t o work an injustice.
Mr. Greene stated that in other words, if there was a hardship created by this
thing, that is just too bad. Mr. Pinto stated that he has to work at things
from the viewpoint if he is in Court tomorrow what the cbcision of the Court
might be.
Mr. Harsha stated that it is the Commission's duty to see that alleys are be-
hind C-2 property; therefore, Commissioner's can vote as they wish but it was
his personal feeling that Commission is within its rights to have an alley
put through. If a store were erected on that property it will be necessary for
them to have access.
Mr. Walker stated that if Commission were to consider an alley behind the
business property, is the Commission sure that there is sufficient land for
gas station and an alley.
Mr. Harsha stated the Subdivision Rules and Regulations calls for 20' alley.
Mr. Caffery stated that he wants to gpt along with the neighbors because they
are the ones who are going to buy the gas. If an alley is placed at the rear
of the property, could not give away 20' for alley plus 10' for greenbelt. If
it is for the purpose of servicing C-2 property, there and adjoining this
particular piece of property, will agree to some sort of an agreement if and
when the Commission deems it necessary. Suggested 10' or 20' easement on the
West line of parcels thereby servicing property to the West. Station does not
need alley in the back and it might be a hardship on theaijoining property.
Mr. Harsha stated there must be access to the rear.
TheFecretary read Section 4.03, Subdivision Rules and Regulations.
Mr. Steinhoff stated petitioner should beafforded an opportunity to submit
workable plot plan with the thought that that there be an alley.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Steinhoff and seconded Iv Mr. Lotz, itwes
#1-3-57 RESOLVED that, Petition M-36 by Michael J. Caffery requesting
permission to erect a gasolineservice station on Parcels
O1FF1 and 01FF2GG located on the Northwest corner of Seven
f.
1562 9
e
Mile and Angling Roads in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 1
E I be tabled until February 5, 1957 in order to afford
petitioner an opportunity to provide Commission with plot
plan.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYF_. : Greene, Steinhoff, Lotz, Okerstrom, Walker and Miller
NAYS: Kane and Harsha
Mr. Greene suggested petitioner explore alley situation and the right angle
as suggested by petitioner is not too good.
Mr. Caffery asked whether he had to have greenbelt and alley both.
Mr. Harsha stated that the regulation read (Section 4.03) is part of the Sub-
division Rules and Regulations. There is the point as to whether these
regulations would apply to this particular piece of property. Suggested City
Attorney look into this. Do not wish to penalize petitioner if Commission does
not have to.
The Vice-Chairman called a recess at approximately 10:25 p.m.
The Vice-Chairman called the meeting to order at approximately 10:31 p.m. with
all present as named at the beginning and course of meeting.
*Mr. H. Paul Harsha relinquished the Chair to Robert L. Greene and was excused
from the meeting.
The secretary announced that the next item on the agenda was Petition M-37
by Al's Sign Erection requesting permission to erect an 18' x 4' (72 square
feet) neon flat -ign 10" thick, 24 gauge metal U.L. approved 2x24 angle
iron frame sign on portion of Parcel 36B1 at the Evergreen Cleaners located
at 11508 Middlebelt Road and situated on the Southeast corner of Plymouth
and Middlebelt Roads in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36. The secretary read
letter dated December 26, 1956 from Calvin Roberts, Chief Livonia Fire Depart-
ment. Mr. Maurice Klapman was present (owner of store) .
Mr. Klapman stated that the sign is white with a little evergreen tree and
will be placed flat against the building. This will be the only sign on the
building. Store will be a pick-up station only.
No one was present objecting to petition as presented.
Upon a motion hely made by Mr. Kane, seconded by Mr. Walker and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-4-57 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been
held the City Planning Commission does hereby grant
Petition M-37 by Al's Sign Erection requesting permission
to erect an 18' x 4' (72 square feet) neon flat sign 10"
thick, 24 gauge metal U.L. approved 2x24 angle iron frame
sign on portion of Parcel 36B1 at the Evergreen Cleaners
1 Ift
4"
0.04..
C"7
located at 11508 Middlebelt Road and situated on the South-
east corner of Plymouth and Middlebelt Roads in the Northwest
1/4 of Section 36 since the sign is necessary to business, con-
forms with surrounding area and complies with all rules and
regulations, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to the
property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Depart-
ments as listed in the Proof of Service.
The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution aiopted.
The secretary announced that the next item on the agenda was Petition M-38
by Harry Tennyson, Tennyson Chevrolet, Inc. requesting permission to erect OK
Used Car authorized Chevrolet Dealer Sign on Parcel 27Elcicl located at
32570 Plymouth Road and - ituated on the North side of Plymouth Road approxi-
mately 1,800 feet East of Farmington Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27.
Mr. Vincent Green was present representing the petitioner.
Mr. Steinhoff asked if there will be over-hang of sign onto right-of-way.
Mr. Green stated there will not.
Lieutenant Perry stated the Fire Department had no objection to proposed sign.
Didn't write letter but did check location for over-hanging wires.
No one was present objecting to sign.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Lotz, seconded by Mr. Greene and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-5-57 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition M-38
by Harry Tennyson, Tennyson Chevrolet, Inc. requesting
permission to erect OK Used Car authorized Chevrolet Dealer
Sign (Double faced 14' wide, 11' 1" high, 11" thick, 12" I.D.
center pole installation. Estimated Current consumption 4500
volt amperes. Approximate weight 2230 lbs. Sign carries
labels. OK symbol flashes on and off, border stripes are
animated. Flasher units used will not cause radio interference
in adjacent residences. All materials inside and outare of
top quality and treated as necessary to minimize rust and
corrosion) on Parcel 27Elcicl located at 32570 Plymouth Road
and situated on the North side of Plymouth Road approximately
1,800 feet Ear,t of Farmington Road in the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 27 because it conforms to the regulations of City
Ordinances and has proper set back from right-of-way, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of theebove hearing was sent to
property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments
as listed in the Proof of Service
The Chairmanccclared the foregoing resolution adopted.
1541
The secretary announced that the next item on the agenda was resolution No.
12-108-56 adopted b y the Commission December 4, 1956 in which it was
determined that there should be a hearing on the question whether or not
Cathedral Drive located between Henry huff and Merriman Roads in the Southwest
1/4 of Section 3 5 should be changed to Olson Avenue to correspond t o the
alignment of Olson Avenue to the East. The secretary read letter dated
January 5, 1957 from Postmaster Arthur G. Jenkins.
No one was present objecting to change of street name.
Mr. Kane stated he wondered if there were other subdivisions further West that
have received tentative approval that had the name of Cathedral Drive on a
street. The Commission could think of no other subdivision in area that would
carry Cathedral Drive further West.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Kane, seconded by Mr. Miller and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-6-57 RESOLVED that, City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council that Cathedral Drive located between Henry
Ruff and Merriman Roads in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 35 be
changed to Olson Avenue in order to conform with the numbering
and alignment of Olson Avenue to the East subject to letter
dated January 5, 1957 from Postmaster Arthur G. Jenkins.
The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution adopted.
EThe secretary read letters dated November 27, 1956 from Benton Yates, Supt.,
Livonia Public Schools regarding school sites in Sections 11 and 35.
Mr. Miller stated that the proposed site in Section 35 will be directly
East of Cathedral Drive. There is a problem as to whether Cathedral Drive
should be connected to Olson Avenue and if so how, through the school property.
At the present time, there is a row of homes on Cathedral Drive and Olson
Avenue. In his opinion the street should be through and that the residents to
the North feel that it should connect.
Mr. Greene stated it would be in order to ask Board for their opinion.
Mr. Miller stated that Comnission should point out alternative of jogging
street which would be bad because of the double frontage lots.
Lieutenant Perry was excused from meeting at approximately 11:25 p.m.
There was a brief discussion of whether or not the proposed school site in
Section 11 should be placed on the Master Plan now inasmuch as it is indicated
in letter from Mr. Yates that there is some question as to the location of the
park site.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Walker and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-7-57 RESOLVED that, a letter be written to Mr. Benton Yates, Supt.
Livonia Public Schools regarding the School and Park Sites in
Section 11 (letter dated November 27, 1956 from Benton Yates)
informing him that Commission cannot designate the sites on
the Master Plan until such time as Commission hears further
from the Livonia Public Schools and the Parks and Recreation
Commission that the proposed plan is definite.
The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Kane and seconded by Mr. Walker, it was
#1-8-57 RESOLVED that, statement dated January 2, 1957 from Albe
Munson, Planning Consultant for 016.80 be approved and
forwarded to the proper department for payment
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Steinhoff, Lotz, Okerstrom, Kane, Walker, Greene and Miller
NAYS: None
On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted this public hearing
was duly adjourned at approximately 11:45 p.m., January 8, 1957.
•
Ro.ert L. Miller, Secretary
ATTESTED:
H. Paul Hash Vice- Chairman
Robert . G ee e, Chairman pro tem