Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1959-10-20 . 2664 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE 108TH REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING CC IISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA 1110 ' On October 20, 1959 the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held a Public Hearing and the 108th Regular Meeting at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Angevine, Chairman, called the Public Hearing to order at approximately 8:05 p.m. Members present: Dennis Anderson, Wilford Okerstrom, Leonard Kane, Robert L. Angevine, H. Paul Harsha, Charles Walker and Robert Peacock. Members absent :William R. Robinson and 4Robert L. Greene Mr. David McCullough, City Planner and Mr. Rodney C. Kropf, Assistant City Attorney were present along with approximately 50 interested persons. Mr. McCullough announced the first item on the agenda was Petition Z-421 by the City Planner of the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not to rezone property located on the Northeast corner of Plymouth and Middlebelt in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25 from M-1 to C-2. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Harsha, it was 1E X10,-311-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Petition Z-421 as submitted by the City Planning Commission for a change of zoning in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25 from M-1 to C-2, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-421 be granted in order to avoid any difficulties which may arise from proposed legislation pro- hibiting all non-industrial uses in industrial zone, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of October 1, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Telephone Co., The Consumers Power Company, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Peacock, Walker, Harsha, Anderson, Okerstrom, Kane and Angevine NAYS: None The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. I Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-416 by Max Baskin, et al, is asking that the zoning classification on property located on the North side of Ann Arbor Trail approximately 350 ft. West of Ann Arbor Road in the Northeast II[: 1/4 of Section 31 be changed from R-3 to C-2. *Mr. Greene arrived at approximately 8:10 p.m. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. 2665 11[: Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Kane, it was #10-312-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Petition Z-416 as submitted by Max Baskin, et al, for a change of zoning in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31 from R-3 to C-2, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-416 be granted for the reasons (1) that it makes commercial zoning on the north side of Ann Arbor Trail equally extensive with that which exists on the south side of Ann Arbor Road, (2) it differs from Petitions Z-249 and Z-249a in that substantially less land is involved in this petition, FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of October 1, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co., Consumers Power Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Telephone Co., City Departments and petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Peacock, Walker, Harsha, Anderson, Kane and Angevine NAYS: Okerstrom NOT VOTING: Greene The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-418 by Jack Coleman, Unity Construction Company who is asking that the zoning classification on property located on the Northeast corner of Schoolcraft and Levan in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 20 be changed from AGB to R1A, R-3 and C-2. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. McCullough suggested that this item be taken under advisement by the City Planning Commission because of the three different types of zoning requested and the large amount of property involved. Mr. Walker concurred with Mr. McCullough. Mr. Angevine stated this item would be taken under advisement for further study. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-419 by Charles Cannon who is asking that the zoning classification on property located on the North side of Plymouth Road approximately 800 ft. West of Priscilla Lane in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28 be changed from C-1 to C-2. Mr. Cannon was present. 1,0 Mr. McCullough informed those present that it was originally planned to establish a drive-in restaurant ohhhe property in the rezoning petition. The petition for permission to establish restaurant follows as the next item on the agenda. Mr. Cannon had informed Mr. McCullough before the meeting that he is going to withdraw the petition for permission to establish the drive-in restaurant but that he desires to go ahead with the petition for rezoning. Mr. Cannon presented a plot Ass Of the area. 2666 I: Mr. Peacock asked why continue with the rezoning if the following item on the agenda is to be withdrawn. Mr. Cannon answered that they felt it was a good investment. Mr. Walker asked if this property is rezoned to C-2, wouldn't it be isolated and surrounded by C-1? Mr. McCullough stated this was right. Mr. Okerstrom asked if it had been determined where Wayne Road is to be designated north of Plymouth in order to connect it with Wayne Road further north. Mr. Mc- Cullough stated this was one reason petitioner was withdrawing his petition for a drive-in restaurant. He further stated that the Traffic Commission and the Wayne County Road Department favor having Wayne Road cut across this particular piece of property. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience.who wished to speak. Mr. Robert C. Engler, 11701 Boston Post Road, stated he objected to property being used for a drive-in restaurant. Mr. Angevine informed Mr. Engler that the petition requesting permission for the drive-in restaurant had been withdrawn and the only petition before the Commission at this time was for rezoning. Mr. Joe Vanzo, 12066 Boston Post Road, representing Tri-Sub Civic Association stated they preferred the present zoning. He felt that the C-2 zoning would allow uses objectionable to the residential area adjacent to the commercial property. He stated if this property is rezoned to C-2 the petitioner could come in later and erect a IL: drive-ix restaurant which would be objectionable to the present residential owners. Mr. Robert Acchione, 2710 David Stott Building, Detroit, stated he felt this property should be zoned C-2 due to the amount of traffic on Plymouth and the fact that this road will be widened in the near future. He felt that since the rrr'perty is so deep, that something could be dcne to prctsc+ ;he residential area adjacent to the commercial Mr. William Robinson arrived at approximately 8:30 p.m. Mr. Walker felt that since this particular piece of property backs up to Alden Village Subdivision it should be developed commercially under a lighter zone, C-1 and not C-2 because the C-2 zoning may harm the existing residential homes. It was felt by Mr. Walker that a protective zoning should be designated between the resiasntial and commercial to protect the existing residential zone. Mr. Walker continued,suggesting that this item be taken under advisement otherwise he would be infavor of denying it. Mr. Peacock concurred with Mr. Walker. Mr. Angevine declared that this item would be taken under advisement for further Iftbr Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-172 by Charles Cannon requesting permission to erect a Drive-In Restaurant on the North side of Plymouth Road approximately 800 ft. West of Priscilla Lane in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28. Mr. McCullough stated that Mr. Cannon has requested that this item be withdrawn. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was #10-313-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning,Commission does hereby allow Petition M-172 by Charles Cannon to be withdrawn as requested by petitioner. 2667 A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: 1[40 AYES: Robinson, Peacock, Walker, Greene, Harsha, Anderson, Okerstrom, Kane and Angevine NAYS: None ;The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. i Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-417 by Elmdale, Inc., E. C. Schubiner, who is asking that the zoning classification on property located on the North side of Five Mile Road, approximately 350 feet East of Middle- belt and 1,000 ft. West of Harrison in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13 be changed from RUFB to R1A. Mr. Harry B. Wright was present for the petitioner. Mr. Okerstrom asked if there was a proposed plot plan for this area? Mr. Wright presented a proposed plan for the property in the rezoning petition. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Kane, supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimously adopted, it was #10,-314-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959 on Petition Z-417 as submitted by E. C. Schubiner, Elmdale, Inc., for a change of zoning in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14 from RUFB to R1A, the City lig Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition No. Z-417 be granted since the requested zoning fits in harmoniously with existing land use and will be an improvement, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of October 1, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, The Consumers Power Company, City Departments and petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Application TA-58 by P. L. Kozub requesting permission to remove topsoil from land located approximately 450 ft. north of Schoolcraft and 1300 feet Wast of Middlebelt Road (Known as Mar-Git Subdivision) in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24. Mr. Kozub was present. Mr. McCullough submitted a recommendation from the Engineering Department dated October 6, 1959 approving removal of topsoil. No written report had been submitted by the Police Department but they approved removal verbally to the secretary. It was determined there were fifteen (15) acres involved in the application. Mr. Walker stated there were no objections from the Topsoil Committee. 1[40 Mr. Okerstrom questio_•ed whether the removal of topsoil would hinder the flow of the drain situated on the :roperty. Mr. Walker felt that the Engineering Department would see to it that nothing is done to hinder the flow of the drain. Mr. Harsha stated the grading should be mai,ntained to puevq;t•101ill .401Wii per. 2668 I: Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was #10-315-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959 the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Application TA-58 by P. L. Kozub requesting per- mission to remove topsoil from property located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24, subject to the following conditions: (a) that the applicant shall not at any time allow water to collect on the subject property or on adjoining property and at all times shall maintain adequate drainage; (b) that the applicant shall not excavate below the grade of any proposed subdivision streets; (c) that the applicant shall at all times comply with all traffic requirements established by the Police Department; (d) that the applicant shall be obligated to seed all of the land from which topsoil has been removed with some seed acceptable to the Department of Parks & Recreation unless at the time the applicant petitions for the release of the topsoil bond, the Planning Commission relieves the petitioner of this obliga- tion, and FURTHER RESOLVED, that a performance bond be fixed on the above I: application for approximately 15 acres more or less at $500.00 per acre and it is recommended that the Bureau of Inspection issue a permit to this effect, and FURTHER RESOLVED, ri,Aica of the abtr--re hearing was sent to the property owners within 500 ft., petitioner, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service and recommendations having been obtained from the Department of Public Works under date of October 6, 1959, said approval to be subject to all con- ditions set by thegineering Dept. in said recommendation. The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-171 by the Ohio Oil Company requesting permission to construct a service station on the Northwest corner of Five Mile Road and Newburg Roads in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 18. Mr. Shoupe was present for the petitioner. Mr. McCullough submitted a plot and area plan of the proposed gas station. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. The question was raised as to whether or not he required setback was maintained. It was determined the proper setback was shown on the plan. Mr. Peacock asked if a protective wall was to be erected around the C-2 property. I: Mr. Shoupe stated that they were not using the complete area of C-2 zoning. There was a remaining area of C-2 between their proposed gas station and residential section. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was #10-316-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having6be69 en held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959 the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition M-171 by the Ohio Oil Company re- questing permission to construct a service station on the Northwest corner of Five Mile Road and Newburg Roads in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 18, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to the property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-173 by Doyle R. Tippett, requesting permission to erect and operate a Drive-In Restaurant on the South side of Plymouth Road approximately 220 feet West of Farmington Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33. Mr. Tippett was present. Mr. McCullough pre- sented a plot and area plan to the members of the Commission. Mr. Peacock asked what type of bu3ldinc was going to built upon this property. Mr. Tippett presented a drawing of the proposed building. It was determined that the property involved in petition reached the thirty (30) foot easement on the west side of the property, but the easement was not shown on the plat book. IL: Mr. Harsha asked what was the depth of commercial on this property. It was determined that the petitioner was only using part of the commercially zoned property. Mr. Harsha felt that this would land lock the remaining part of the commercial area. The petitioner was asked if he would be willing to dedicate that portion of his property in back of the proposed drive-in restaurant not included in petition so as not to landlock the property further west of his property. Mr. Tippert stated they would be agreeable to this. Mr. Peacock asked if a protective wall was to be erected along the 400 ft. line even though• the balance of the property was not going to be used at the present time. Mr. Tippett stated they plan to landscape the property not being used for the restaurant so as to conform with the Professional Village south of their property, but they would be willing to erect a wall if it was required. Mr. Walker felt if their property abuts the Professional Village a protective wall is not necessary but it is required if it abuts residential property. It was determined that the Professional Village was immediately south of the property owned by the Citrin Oil Company which was adjacent to the property in this petition. Mr. Charles •Cannon, on behalf of Mr. Tippett, stated that the Professional Village owner has stated they might be interested in purchasing the property behind the proposed drive-in restaurant. Mr. Walker stated there seem to be some doubt as to whether or not a wall should be erected. He felt that the City should *sept the offer from the petitioner to erect a wall 6 and hold it in abeyance until we determine that a wall is necessary. Mr. Okerstrom stated that the petitioner has also agreed to dedicate the back portion of their property for a street if it is found to be necessary. 2670 110 Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. Harsha felt that a recommendation should be obtained from the Traffic Commission and the Police Department before a decision is made and that until such time a recommendation is received he would have to vote Mor'. Mr. Kane asked if their opimicn had been sought. It was determined no recommendation had been asked from these two departments. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, it was #10- -59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition M-173 by Doyle R.Tippett requesting permission to erect and operate a Drive-in R staurant on the South side of Plymouth Road approximately 226 ft. West of Farmington Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, subject to the following: (1) receiving approval from the Traffic Commission and the Police Department, (2) petitioner to furnish the Planning Commission with a letter agreeing to erect a protective wall at a future date if the Planning Commission determines it is necessary. Mr. Anderson stated he would support Mr. Pe acock's motion to approve but suggested that a definite date be established as to how long we will hold him to erecting a wall. Mr. Anderson also asked if there was to be outdoor music. It was determined there would be no outdoor music. Mr. Peacock concurred with Mr. Anderson and amended his motion to approve as follows: #10- -59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959 the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition M-173 by Doyle R. Tippett. requesting permission to erect and operate a Drive-In Restaurant on the South side of Plymouth Road approximately 220 ft. West of Farmington Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, subject to the following: (1) receiving approval from the Traffic Commission and the Police Department, (2) petitioner to furnish the Planning Commission with a letter agreeing to erect a protective wall within a two year length of time if the Planning Commission determines it is necessary. Mr. Robinson asked Mr. Kropf if the Planning Commission should require a bond to cover the erection of the wall. I: Mr. Kropf stated this was within the Planning Commission's jurisdiction. The amount of the bond should be set by the Bureau of Inspection. Mr. Robinson asked Mr. Peacock if he would amend his motion to approve to ask that a bond be required as set by the Bureau of Inspection. Mr. Peacock stated he would amend his resolution to include this condition as follows: #10- -59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held 2671 on Tuesday, October 20, 1959, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition M-173 by Doyle R. Tippett requesting permission to erect and operate a Drive-In Restaurant on the South side of Plymouth Road approximately 220 ft. W st of Farmington Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, subject to the following: (1) receiving approval from the Traffic Commission and the Police Department, (2) petitioner to furnish the Planning Commission with a letter agreeing to erect a protective wall within a two year length of time if the Planning Commission determines it is necessary, (3) petitioner to furnish a bond to cover the cost of erecting said protection wall, amount to be set by the Bureau of Inspection. Mr. Okerstrom asked if the two year period would start from the date of the build- ing permit or from the date the Planning Commission approve3the petition? He su;4ested the date of the building permit. Mr. Kropf did not agree. Mr. Robinson suggested the date of occupancy. Mr. Anderson stated there was a motion on the floor. Mr. Peacock stated he would amend his resolution to state that the two year time. limit start from eat* Whom, 4 ho petition trap approved and the resolution adopted. Mr. Robinson stated if the date is set as suggested by Mr. Peacock, and the petitioner does not pick up the building permit for two years, there would be no control. Mr. Greene stated that there would still be a control over this matter due to the fact that the property is still residential zoning. Mr. Robinson asked if the Planning Commission can ask for a protective wall even though the petitioner does not use the property. It was determined that this can be done. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously adopted, it vias, #10-317-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been hdd on Tuesday, October 20, 1959 the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition M-173 by Doyle R. Tippett requesting per- mission to erect and operate a Drive-In Restaurant on the South side of Plymouth Road approximately 220 feet West of Farmington Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, subject to the following: (1) receiving approval from the Traffic Commission and the Police Department; (2) petitioner to furnish the Planning Commission with a letter agreeing to erect a protective wall within a two year length of time if the Planning Commission determines it necessary, said two year limit to besin today; (3) petitioner to furnish a bond to cover the cost of erecting said protection wall, amount of bond to be set by the Bureau of Inspection; 2672 4. that the proposed building be erected no closer than 120 feet from center line of Plymouth Road; 1E, 5. that outside music devices shall be maintained so that they are inaudible at the nearest residential property line; FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-174 by Stanlez F. Webber requesting permission to use property for open air sales of swimming pools on the Last side of Middlebelt Road between Elsie and Jamison Avenue in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24. Mr. Webber was present. It was determined that this property is located next to the Green Garage Builders. Mr. Webber stated there would be a small office buil : upon the premises. Mr. Okerstrom stated there was a large drain located through this property. Mr. Webber stated the drain was located approximately 40 ft. north of their property line and to the rear. Mr. Okerstrom asked if this area would be fenced. Mr. Webber stated it would be for the entire 99 ft. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. Peacock asked if there was an ordinance pertaining to swimming pools. Mr. Knopf stated there was with very rigid controls. Mr. Harsha asked if this would be a permanent type pool. Mr. Webber stated it IL: would be permanent. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Kane, supported by Mr. Walker, it was #10-318-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition 11,474, by Stanley F. Webber, requesting permission to use property for open air sales of swim ring pools on the East side of Middlebelt Road between Elsie and Jamison Avenue in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Okerstrom asked if the open air sales will be for anything else besides swimming pools. Mr. Webber stated he had no intention of selling other items than the pools. Mr. Walker asked Mr. Kropf is approval is granted for open air sales for a specific item, can the petitioner sell other items? Mr. Kropf stated in this case it is simple, the petitioner is asking permission to sell swimming pools. If he violates the permit the Bureau of Inspection I: would stop him from selling. Mr. Harsha stated if the petitioner desires to sell other items he can always come back before the Planning Commission. A roll call on Resolution #10-318-59 resulted in the following: AYES: Robinson, Peacock, Walker, Greene, Harsha, Anderson 2673 I[: Okerstrom, Kane and Angevine The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-175 by William Rappaport requesting permission to operate the Star 7—wer and Garden Center on the Northwest corner of Priscilla Lane and Plymouth Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28. Mr. Rappaport was not present. Mr. Angevine asked if this involved open air sales. Mr. McCullough stated it did. Mr. Walkt3r asked if there was any information as to whether or not the property reaches Priscilla Lane? Mr. McCullough stated there wasn't. Mr. Kane suggested that since there were questions to be answered and the petitioner wee not present to answer them, the petition should be taken under advisement. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. Joe Vanzo, 12066 Boston Post Road, representing the Tri-Sun°Civic Association stated they did not object to the nursery providing it follows the requirements of the City but they would like to request that there be no intercom or public address system. Asked also what type of wall will be erected between the commercial and residential property. 1[40 Mr. Angevine stated that the ordinance requires a 5 to 7 ft. wall made of reinforced poured concrete or hardburned brick. Mr. Harsha stated he wished to concur with Mr. Vanzo in objecting to any loud speaking apparatus. Mr. Angeline declared that this item will be taken under advisement. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-176 by Joseph and Edith Stockdale requesting permission to operate a dry-cleaning plant located on the North side of Plymouth Road between Merriman and Farmington Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 27, known as 32128 Plymouth. Mr. Joseph Stockdale and Mr. Don Stockdale were present. Mr. McCullough informed the Commission that Mr. Stockdale has complied with the ordinance in relation to submitting the necessary signatures. Mr. Peacock asked if this was to be a retail or wholesale store. Mr. Don Stockdale stated they would be only doing their work and would have only one truck. Mr. Peacock asked how far was the present dance studio from the extension-they are going to erect. Mr. Stockdale answered approximately nine (9) feet. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. 1[0 Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously adopted, it was #10-319-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition M-176 by Joseph & Edith Stockdale requesting permission to operate a dry-cleaning plant located on the North side of Plymouth Road between Merriman and Farmington Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 27, and 2674 I[: FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. '':Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was the proposed Gordon- Begin Park Subdivision submitted by Gordon-Begin Real Estate, Inc., and located South of Lyndon Avenue and app roximately 950 feet North of Schoolcraft and West of Buckingham Village in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24. Mr. Gordon and Mr. Zumstein were present. Nr. McCullough submitted recommendations from the Bureau of Inspection dated October 15, 1959; the Department of Parks & Recreation dated October 19, 1959 and from the Police Department dated October 20, 1959. Mr. McCullough stated that the developer is curving Harrison Avenue off the section line where it is presently acc•igna.t7,`Harrison Avenue, north of Lyndon is approximately 160 ft. east of Harrison shown on the proposed plat. It is felt it would be more advantageous to curve Harrison south of Lyndon to the east to meet Harrison north of Lyndon but the developer does not agree as it will eliminate approximately six lots from the plat. A number of street names will have to be changed in order to conform with streets presently existing. Buckingham street slould be extended on the east to meet with Buckingham street in the Buckingham Village Subdivision. Mr. McCullough continued stating that if Harrison street is approved as shown on plat, the Master Thoroughfare Plan would have to be amended before plat can be approved. The School Board has informed the Planning Commission that they are agreeable to dedicating their half of Harrison to the developer providing he paves the entire street. Mr. Peacock suggested taking this item under advisement. Mr. Greene asked if the Traffic Commission had made any suggestions. Mr. McCullough stated they had informed him that they preferred his recommendation, connecting Harrison south of Lyndon with Harrison North of Lyndon. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. Hans Hartman, 28186 Schoolcraft, owner of property immediately east of sub- division stated he did not object to the plat but would like to see a street connecting the Buckingham Village with the new one so as not to landlock the back portion of his property. Mr. Homer Lawrence, 14336 Brentwood asked if this areawas suppose to have a park. Mr. McCullough stated that the Parks & Recreation Department had informed him that they do not need any of the property in the proposed plat for a park. Mr. Gordon stated he felt that the park Mr. Lawrence is referring to is the one North of Lyndon. I[: Mr. Lawrence further stated he felt that the lots in the proposed subdivision should conform with the lots on Brentwood, the minimum of which are 64 x 140. It was de- termined that the lots in the new subdivision ran between 60 to 75 ft. in width. Mr. Lawrence asked what size homes are allowed in this subdivision. Mr. Angevine stated in a R1A district the minimum size is 1,000 sq. ft. Mr. Lawrence stated his home had 1590 sq. ft., and that the new homes should be of the same size so as not to devaluate their homes. Mr. Gordon stated that the new homes would be comparable to the ones previously built by him on Brentwood. 2675 The question was asked why there was no park in this area. Several property owners present stated they had been informed at the time they purchased their I[: homes that there was to be a park in the immediate vicinity. Mr. Angevine stated if they were referring to the parks as designated on the Master Pattern, these parks are only designated and nothing definite has been settled in relation to them. Stated further that there is a park designated north of Lyndon. Mr. Harsha informed Mr. Gordon that Lot 62 did not meet the requirements of the ordinance. Mr. Gordon stated that the width of Lot 62 had been increased to 67ft. to conform with the ordinance. The question was asked what assurance did the present home owners have that the new homes will be of equal value. Mr. Angevine stated there was no assurance as to what value the new homes will be. The minimum square footage allowed in this area is 1,000 sq. ft. and they will have to confcrm with this. Mr. Greene stated that that specific problem is being discussed between the City Council and the City Planning Commission whereby a new house will have to conform comparably with the existing homes adjoining them. At the moment nothing has been settled. Mr. Kane stated that Mr. Gordon has informed them tonight that he is going to build homes which will b e comparable to what is already existing. Mr. Angevine stated that this item will be taken under advisement. Mr. Zumsteia stated in platting the Gordon-Begin Park Subdivision some changes had I[: to be made in the Mar-Git Subdivision, which has been given preliminary approval. previously. He asked if it is necessary to submit a revised plat of the Mar-Git Subdivision for approval or can tre changes be incorporated at the time the final plat is submitted? It was determined that this revised plat should be studied further at a study session. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the propos4d Dover Courts Subdivision submitted by the Lightstone Development Company and located North of Joy Road between Hix and Eckles Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31. Mr. Light- stone and Mr. Heyden, attorney for the company, mere present. Mr. McCullough submitted ;;commendations from the Bureau of Inspection, dated October 15, 1959; from the Police Department dated October 19, 1959; from the Department of Parks & Recreating dated October 19, 1959 and from the Fire Department dated October 20, 1959. Mr. McCullough stated that no letter had been received from the School Board. Mr. McCullough informed the Commission that Mr. R. Bleznak, developer of property immediately north of the proposed subdivision has asked that approval of this subdivision be delayed until the matter of the sewer and street layout is more fully decided. Mr. Lightstone stated they had conferred with Mr. Bleznak but that they had not come to a decision as yet. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. I[: Mr. A. Jackson, 8990 Hix Avenue objected to Northfield stopping directly: in front of his home. Mr. Heyden stated this was a common practice in platting subdivisions. Mr. Walker suggested that this item be taken under advisement until the two developers can make some decision in relation to the sewer and street layout. Mr. Angevine stated this item would be taken under advisement until the next meeting 2676 G scheduled for November 10, 1959. Mr. Harsha stated that before this item is taken under advisement, he would like to inform Mr. Lightstone that Lot #10 is too small and he felt that Dover is too long. Mr. Okerstrom question'-d houses both facing and siding on Eckles Road. Mr. Angevine stated that this item would be taken under advisement. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-420 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to determine whether or not Section 4.45 of Article 4.00 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia should be amended. This is in relation to Protective Walls. Mr. McCullough informed the Commission that there is a meeting with the City Council scheduled for October 27th, 1959 at which time this matter could be dis- cussed in order to obtain the City Councilvs feelings on the amendment. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. Angevine declared that this item is taken under advisement. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-422 by the City Planner of the City planning Commission to determine whether or not to amend Sections 10.05, 10.07 and 10.17 of Article 10.00; and Sections 11.06, 11.19 of I[: Article 11.00 of Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia so as to c^ : ? existing commercial front and side yard requirements. Mr. McCullough stated this amendment would do away with the required setback of 40 ft. in commercial districts with lots having only 100 ft. in depth. The setback in these cases would be the average of existing buildings within 300 ft. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. The Chairman declared this item would be taken under advisement for further study. Upon a motion duly made by Fir. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was #10-320-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the Public Hearing at approximately 10:45 p.m. on Tuesday, October 20, 1959. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Robinson, Peacock, Walker, Greene, Harsha, Anderson, Okerstrom Kane and Angevine NAYS: None 1E: The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the public hearing is adjourned. Mr. Angevine called a recess at approximately 10:46 p.m. The Chairman called the 108th Regular Meeting to order at approximately 10:58 p.m. with all those present now who were present at the time recess was called. 2677 Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-411 by Clarence Charest on behalf of Susan E. Tice and Francis & Madoline Bazo who is asking that the zoning classification on property located on the Northeast corner of Stark Road and Ann Arbor Trail in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33 be changed from RUFB to PS. Public Hearing 9/15/59, item taken under advisement; study meeting 9/29/59. Mr. Charest was present. Mr. Walker stated that if the rezoning is granted, the owner will be able to improve the convalescent home which will be of benefit to the patients in the home. He further stated he did not think that the use was detrimental to the surrounding residents. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Harsha and unanimously adopted, it was #10-321-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, September 15, 1959 on Petition Z-411 as submitted by Clarence Charest on behalf of Susan E. Tice and Francis & Madoline Bazo for a change of zoning in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33 from RUFB to PS, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-411 be granted for the reason that its usage has been in existence for many years and has not proved detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of August 27, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Mich- igan Bell Telephone Company, The Consumers Power Company, City Departments and petitioners as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Harsha stated he felt it was an excellent location for the convalescent home. The Chairman declared the foregoing motion is carried and the resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-164 by Joseph Cyr, Architect & Associates who is requesting permission to build a church on the South side of Jamison between Middlebelt and Garden in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24. Public Hearing August 1£3, 1959, item taken under advisement; study meeting September 29, 1959. Mr. McCullough informed the Commission that the North side of Jamison is being paved by the City but the South side has not been dedicated as yet. Mr. Peacock felt that a complete road should be made and not as it is. He did not like to deny the petitioner the right to build a church but he felt that something should be worked out between the City and the church. He further stated that the City could not gravel the north side of Jamison because of the ditch I[: located there. Mr. Walker stated herred with Mr. Peacock. He stated that the street is t $ i c strictly for cine. way and would become very hazadous in the winter -Season and very dangerous to the neighborhood children going to the school in that vicinity. Mr. Anderson asked if some of the cars coming from the church wouldntt.:trivdl•:down Camden and Haller to Five Mile Road instead of using Jamison? 1 2678 Mr. Walker stated if they were safety-minded they would. Upon Mr. Peacock': suggestion, Mr. Angevine declared that this item would be taken under advisement. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the revised plat of Kimberly Oaks Estates Subdivision #2. Preliminary approval granted June 30, 1959. Subdivision is located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, north of Schoolcraft, east of Farmington and west of Hubbard. Submitted by Pastor Development Company. Mr. Pastor was present. Mr. McCullough informed the Commission that Mr. A. Gentry, 14251 Brookfield and Mr. I. Fuertsch, 14229 Brookfield had objected to Mayfield Avenue becoming dead end at the back part of their properties thereby landlocking their property. Mr. Pastor stated that he had conferred with Mr. Gentry but they had not made any decision as to how to remedy it. Mr. McCullough also informed the Commission that the West 100 ft. of Perth would have to be vacated and the church property included in the plat would have to be rezoned from RUFB to R1A. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Kane, it was #10- -59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby give approval to a revised preliminary plat of the Kimberly Oaks Estates Subdivision #2 located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22 subject to the following: (1) developer will leave: curb out on the triangular parcel which is omitted from the plat; (2) vacate the west 1004 of Perth Avenue in order to allow developer to plat this area; (3) rezone the property owned by the Baptist church from RUFB to R1A. Mr. Gentry asked what 'would happen to the plat if ,t; GEreement could not be made between Mr. Pastor and himself. Mr. Robinson stated this was only a preliminary plat, Mr. Pastor would have to come before the Commission for final approval. He further stated it might be wise to ask Mr. Pastor to stub this triangular piece of property to Mr. Gentry's property. Mr. Pastor stated he was reluctant to do this. Mr. Robinson stated he wished to withdraw his motion to approve revised plat. Mr. Kane withdrew his support also. Mr. Peacock suggested that this item be taken under advisement and scheduled for the next regular meeting on November 10, 1959 in order to give Mr. Pastor and the property owners more time to work out something agreeable to both parties. The Chairman declared that this item would be taken under advisement until November 10, 1959. • • 2679 Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was #10-322-59 RESOLVED that, final plat of New Joy Subdivision #2 located in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 32 be given final approval, and FURTHER RESOLVED, inasmuch as it appears on the records that tentative approval of said proposed plat was given by the City Planning Commission on July 21, 1959; and it further appearing that said proposed plat together with the plans and specifications for improvements therein have been approved by the Department of Public Works under date of September 4, 1959; and it further appearing that a bond in the amount of $35,000.00 pursuant to Council's Resolutions #39-59 and #435-59 to cover the installation of improvements has been filed in the office of the City Clerk under date of March 13, 1959; such bond having been approved by Mr. Rodney C. Kropf, Assistant City Attorney on March 13, 1959 it would therefore appear that all the conditions necessary to the release of building permits have been met and the Building Department is hereby so notified. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimously adopted, it was #10-323-59 RESOLVED that, final plat of Fairway Farms Subdivision located in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 17 be given final approval, and FURTHER RESOLVED, inasmuch as it appears on the records that tentative approval of said proposed plat was given by the City Planning Commission on February 3, 1959; and it further appearing that said proposed plat together with the plans and specifications for improvements therein have been approved by the Department of Public Works under date of April 7, 1959; and it further appearing that a bond in the amount of $32,000.00 pursuant to Council's Resolutions #214-59 abd #520-59 to cover the installation of improvements has been filed in the office of the City Clerk under date of September 3, 1959; such bond having been approved by Rodney C. Kropf, Assistant City Attorney on September 3, 1959 it would therefore appear that all the con- ditions necessary to the release of building permits have been met and the Building Department is hereby so notified. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously adopted, it was #10-324-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant request dated October 7, 1959 from the Slavik Builders, Inc., for a one-year extension on the pre- liminary plat of the Burton Hollows Subdivision #3 located in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16. 2680 The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously adopted, it was #10-325-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant request dated September 22, 1959 from Burt rmes, Inc., for a one-year extension on Meri_Lynn Farms Subdivision, #5-9 located in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 22. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. • Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was a reconsideration of Petition Z-403 by John & Glenna Hulett requesting a rezoning on property located on the Southwest corner of Five Mile Road and Arden Avenue in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 22 from R1B to C-1. City Rlanning Commission denied petition on August 18, 1959; City Council has asked a reconsideration on the basis of amending petition to request a PS zoning instead of a C-1 zoning. Mr. & Mrs. John Hulett were present. Mr. Hulett stated the Council had referred the petition back to the City Planning Commission because it was thought that his use is permitted under a PS zoning. He was a manufacturerts representative. Mr. Kropf stated that under the PS zoning, certain specific uses are listed. It might be wise to have the petitioner furnish proof of his type of business to determine whe ;,her or not his use is listed under PS. Mr. Kane stated if the Planning Commission rezones this property to PS, it would be up to the Bureau of Inspection to decide if he does have a professional use. Mr. Greene stated the gentlemen has indicated what his type of business was; it seems the Planning Commission could decide whether or not it was allowed.under PS. Mr. Hulett stated he would be glad to furnish proof of his type of business. He further stated he hoped a decision could be made tonight as the lease on the office in downtown Detroit is terminating. Mr. Robinson asked if this particular area was the place for PS? Mrs. Hulett asked if she could explain the area to the Planning Commission. She stated that they had purchased the full easement in the rear of their property and a greenbelt could be erected. Mr. Walker stated that even if the Planning Commission denied the PS zoning, the City Council could reverse our decision. Mr. Hulett stated that at the hearing by the City Council an his petition, they had agreed to deny the request for C-1 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. 1[10 Mr. Pinto had suggested having it amended to read PS instead of C-1 and sending it back to the Planning Commission to reconsider. Mr. Green stated he had been at the meeting that night and the consensus of opinion was for a PS zoning. Mr. Robinson did not concurr with the request for PS. 2681 Mr. Harsha was excused at 11:40 p.m. IE Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Okerstrom, it was #10- -59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a reconsideration of Petition Z-403 at the 106th Regular Meeting held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-403 requesting a change of zoning from RiB to C-1 in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 22, be denied for the reasons as previously stated in Resolution #8-253-59. Mr. Kane stated he did not agree with Mr. Robinson. Mr. Okerstrom stated he concurred with Mr. Robinson. A roll call on the foregoing resolution resulted int he following: AYES: Robinson and Okerstrom NAYS: Peacock, Walker, Greene, Anderson, Kane and Angevine The Chairman declared the motion did not carry therefore the resolution is not adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Anderson, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was #10-326-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby allow petitioner to amend Petition Z-403 to read, "R1B to PS" instead of "R1B to C-1". I[: A roll call vote on the foregalg resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Robinson, Peacock, Walker, Greene, Anderson, Okerstrom Kane and Angevine N AYS: None The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Kane, it was #10-327-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a reconsideration of Petition Z-403 at the 108th Regular Meeting held on Tuesday, October 20, 1959 as requested by the City Council in Resolution #639-59, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-403 as amended by Resolution #10-326-59 and requesting a change from R1B to PS, be granted for the reason it will serve as a transitional zone between the commercial on the east and the residential on the west. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Peacock, Walker, Greene, Anderson, Kane and Angevine NAYS: Robinson and Okerstrom The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously I[: adopted, it was #10-328-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on August 18, 1959 on Petition Z-405 as submitted by the City Planning Commission, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-405 be 2682 I[: be denied at the request of the Industrial Committee who w^uld prefer that the side yard requirements be increased rather than establish a minimum area requirement. FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of July 30, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co., Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Tlephone Co., The Consumers Power Company, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Greene and unanimously adopted, it was #10-329-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, Zoning Ordinance No. 60 as amended, the City Planning Commission at this time on its own motion does hereby provide for a Public Hearing to be held to determine whether or not to amend Section 14.08 (a) of Article 14.00 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia which presently reads as follows: Section 14.08 (a) Yard Requirements. Where such building is IL: situated on a lot having an area of one (1) a • .e or less, the front yard shall have a depth of at least fifty (50) feet, the rear yard shall have a depth of at least twenty (20) feet and the side yards shall be not less than ten (10) feet each. shall be amended to read as follows: Section 14.08 (a) Yard Requirements. Where such building is situated on a lot having an area of one (1) acre or less, the front yard shall have a depth of at least fifty (50) feet, the rear yard shall have a depth of at least twenty (20) feet and the side yards shall be not less than twenty (20) feet each. that a hearing be held and that notice be given as provided in Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia and that there shall be a report submitted and recommendation thereon to the City Council. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. After a brief discussion, it was decided to take the next two items, Petition Z-408 (minimum floor area for houses in RL, RU and RUF Districts; increase side yard requirements with attached garages in RL, RU and RUF and 70 foot RiDistricts) and a motion to hold a public hearing in relation to amending Section 4.40 of I[: Article 4.00 (Off-street parking) under advisement for further study before any decision is made. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was 2683 #10-330-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to change its Regular Meeting originally scheduled for Tuesday, November 17, 1959 to Tuesday November 10, 1959. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Walker, and unanimously adopted, it was #10-331-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve statement of Albe Munson in the amount of $276.50 and that it be forwarded to the proper department for payment. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock, and unani- mously adopted it was #10-332-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve statement for $37.50 from The Livonian for the month of September and that it be forwarded to the proper department for payment. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the approval of the minutes for meetings held on April 21, 19'9 and May 5, 1959. Mr. Robinson stated he wished to make a correction on the "Aye's vote on Resolu- tion #4-127-59 on page 2471. His name had been included in the vote but he did not arrive at the meeting until later in the evening. This was in relation to the minutes of April 21, 1959. It was also noted that Mr. Leonard Kane?s name had been mistakenly left off the list of members present at the meeting held on April 21, 1959. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock, and unanimous- ly adopted, it was #10-333-59 RESOLVED that, the Minutes of April 21, 1959 and May 5, 1959 be approved as corrected except for that member who was not present, he abstained from voting. The Chairman declaimed the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the approval of the minutes for the meeting held on Tuesday, September 15, 1959. Mr. Peacock stated that in Resolution #9-294-59 the amendment to Petition Z-404 1[40 should read "RUFB to RLA" and not "RUFB to RIA.". Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimous- ly adopted, it was 2684 #10-334-59 RESOLVED that, the Minutes of September 15, 1959 be approved 1E: as corrected except for that member who was not present, he abstain from voting. The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Walker informed the Commission that a letter had been received from John Migut requesting the Planning Commission to amend a previous resolution adopted on June 30, 1959 in relation to Application TA-49. One of the conditions of the approval was that the applicant would not remove any sand and gravel from the property between the months of November and April. He is requesting permission to remove sand and gravel during the months of November and December so as to enable him to continue his removal operations until January 8, 1960 when the permit expires. Mr. Walker suggested granting this request as the petitioner has complied with every other condition in the approval. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supprted by Mr. Kane, it was #10-335-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to request • dated October 9, 1959 from John Migut requesting the Planning Commission to amend Resolution #6-213-59 on Application TA-49 given approval on June 30, 1959, the City Planning Commission does hereby amend said resolution and grants petitioner, John Migut, permission to remove sand and gravel during the months of November and December, 1959. li: A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Robinson, Peacock, Walker, Greene, Anderson, Okerstrom Kane and Angevine NAYS: None The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimously adopted, this 108th Regular Meeting was duly adjourned at approximately 12:00 midnight on October 20, 1959. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 4.44(-.41411i/a-*%-i2. Leonard K. Kane, Secretary ATTESTED: 1[40 eii.fi-Oe . batt L. Angevi Chairman b 9