HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1959-12-15 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE 2707
110TH REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF TIS CITY OF LIVONIA
On Tuesday, December 15, 1959 the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia
held a Public Hearing and the 110th Regular Meeting at the Livonia City Hall, 33001
Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Robert L. Angevine, Chairman, called the
Public Hearing tocrder at approximately 8:05 p.m.
Members present: H. Paul Marsha, Wilford Okerstrom, Robert Peacock, Leonard K. Kane,
Charles Walker, William Robinson, Dennis Anderson and Robert L.
Angevine
Members absent : Robert L. Greene#
Mr. David McCullough, City Planner was present along with approximately 100 interested
persons.
Mr. McCullough announced the first item on the agenda was Petition Z-432 by David R.
McCullough, City Planner, to determine whether or not to rezone property located on
the South side of Plymouth Road between Middlebelt and Merriman Roads in the North-
east and Northwest 1/4 of Section 35 from M-1 to C-1. Mr. McCullough submitted a
petition signed by several property owners who are objecting to the proposed change
to C-1. Mr. McCullough further stated that the Planning Commission had had a petition
requesting a C-2 for this area but that the City Council had referred it back to the
Planning Commission to reconsider and request the C-1 zoning instead of C-2.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Mr. Jack Garber, 14213 Vassar Dr.,Detroit, stated he had submitted a letter to
the Planning Commission which he would like read at this time. Mr. Garber was in-
formed the letter had been received and recorded. Mr. McCullough stated a letter
had also been received from Mr. Lester Shore also objecting to the rezoning.
Mr. Peter Ventura, 30499 Plymouth, Livonia stated that the other people on the
petition objecting to the rezoning, were not present at this time.
Mr. Garber asked Mr. McCullough a question which Mr. Harsha felt should be stricken
from the records as he felt it was unethical.
Mr. Garber stated he only wished to know the reasons for this request to C-1 zoning.
Mr. Angevine answered that the City Council had requested the City Planning to
hold another public hearing to rezone this property to C-1 instead of C-2.
Mr. Garber asked if the Planning Commission had taken action on Tuesday, August
18, 1959 on this same area. Mr. Angevine stated that the Planning Commission had
taken action and recommended to the City Council that this area be rezoned to C-2.
But the City Council had referred this back to the City Planning requesting that
the zoning be changed to C-1 instead of C-2. This is reason for this present public
hearing.
Mr. Garber stated he felt that the property owners were being handled in such a way
that they were being taken advantage of. He further stated they had purchased this
land to be used under the present zoning of M-1 and it did not seem fair to change
it now to a C-i zoning.
Mr. Walker asked Mr. Garber if he was agreeable to rezoning this property to C-2
instead of the C-1 as requested by the Council, or is he objecting to the M-1 being
• r
2708
11 removed? Mr. Garber answered he would prefer to have this property remain as M-1.
I
#kr. Robert L. Greene arrived at approximately 8:10 p.m.
Mr. Peter Ventura stated he felt that the property owners who had signed the
petition objecting to the rezoning and who were not present would want him to say
that this action if completed would be discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable.
Mr. Ventura further stated that other property in this area now zoned M-1 was not
included in this petition and it was felt by the property owners of the property to
be rezoned that they were being discriminated against and that this petition as
presented should be denied.
Mr. Harsha asked if the petition included all the 14-1 area. Mr. McCullough stated
the petition excluded the property zoned M-1 which is presently Wonderland Shopping
Center and two other parcels which are being used for industrial purposes.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was
#12-355-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Petition Z-432 as submitted by David R. McCullough, City
Planner for a change of zoning in the Northeast and Northwest
1/4 of Section 35 from M-1 to C-1, the City Planning Commission
does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-432
be denied for the following reasons:
(1) present and prospective traffic volumes along Plymouth
Road negative its use for neighborhood business;
(2) proximity to Wonderland Shopping Center and the Ford
Plant weigh heavily against a local commercial business
classification;
(3) to recommend otherwise would be inconsistent with our
action on Petition Z-401 wherein we recommended C-2 zoning
for the subject land;
(4) area would be unequitable for proper tax base for the
City and would be unsuitable for present development due to
the location and size and shape of lots, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in
the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November 25,
1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison
Co., Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Telephone Co.,
TheConsumers Power Co., City Departments and petitioner as listed
in the Proof of Service.
Mr. Anderson asked Mr. Walker if his intention was to send back the original
petition requesting the C-2 zoning to theCity Council.?
Mr. Walker replied that his reasons given in the resolution would make it evident
to the City Council that the City Planning Commission strongly supports the C-2
zoning which was previously recommended in Petition Z-401.
li:
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Peacock, Walker, Robinson, Harsha, Anderson, Okerstrom
Greene, Kane and Angevine
NAYS: None
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
, .
2709
Mr. McCullough announced the next itemson the agenda were Petition Z-426 and Petition
M-179 by Doctor Powell and the Reslo, Inc., who are requesting that the zoning
classification of property located on the Southwest corner of Middlebelt andWent-
worth in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14 be changed from RUFB to R-2 in order to
erect and operate a hospital on said corner. Doctor Powell was present. Mr.
McCullough stated there was no correspondence.
Mr. Peacock asked Dr. Powell what was to become of the large hill on the property
in question.
D".,,Powell said part of it would be included in the landscaping of the property and
part would be cut down. The house on the property would be removed.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Mr. Carl Humble, 29724 Wentworth stated that a petition had been circulated around
the adjacent property owners which objected to the proposed change in zoning and
the erection of hospital. Mr. Humble stated he had this petition with him and would
like permission to read their reasons for objecting. After reading the petition
and stating their objections, Mr. Humble submitted the petition for the records. He
stated there were approximately thirty property owners who objected to the rezoning
and erection of hospital.
Mr. Angevine asked for a show of hands of the persons present in the audience who
were interested in this matter. There were approximately 15 people present. It was
ascertained there were 60 names on the petition.
Mrs. Mary Buckley, 15775 Middlebelt stated her objection to the petition. She felt
area was not large enough for the proposed use.
Mr. Peter Merlie, President of the Madison Civic Association, 15689 Reddon Road,
Livonia submitted a letter dated December 14, 1959 which stated their views on the
proposed rezoning and building of new hospital, in relation to drainage problems.
Mr. Angevine stated that the Planning Commission does not have any jurisdiction over
the engineering plans of the proposed use of this land. Any drainage problems would
have to be taken up with theEngineering Department.
Mr. Peter Buckley, 15775 Middlebelt, stated that they had interviewed people who
live on property within 500 ft. of this area and as Mr. Humble had pointed out pre-
viously, of the 35 people they have spoken to on this matter, 32 of them have joined
in the protest. Mr. Buckley stated they felt this rezoning and new hospital would
do them no good and the only ones to benefit from this are the property owners of
the property in question.
Mr. John Veenstra, 15959 Middlebelt, stated he objected to the proposed hospital.
Mr. gcmene asked DP. Fcwt11 why this particular area was chosen for a hospital.
He 'AI4o.,stated several of the people in the audience were questioning this also.
Dr. Powell, stated that in choosing this site, the amount of doctors and patients
in this. area had been considered and it appeared to be the most logical. Also it
should be noted that this hospital would not only serve Livonia but the surrounding
communities, such as Redford, Farmington and Northville.
E
Mrs. Buckley repeated her objections to the hospital.
Mr. Walker explained that in the matter of paving - the petitioner or builder of
the hospital would be required to only pave half of the road. As far as the noise
is concerned, this has been discussed with the city attorney and there is an
ordinance in relation to noise caused by ambulances. The ingress and egress for
. v
2710
the hospital has not been worked out as yet, but any parking facilities would have
to meet the requirements of the ordinance or the hospital would not be allowed.
Mr. Walker suggested a PS zoning rather thanR-2.
hr. Angevine asked if the commissioners wished to take action on this item at this
time.
Mr. Peacock asked if the attorney had determined if this hospital could be in a
PS zone. Mr. Angevine answered that he had not. Mr. McCullough stated that Mr.
Ponder had suggested the R-2 zoning instead of PS.
Mr. Buckley stated the property owners in this area wish this property to remain
residential but felt they would not object to a commercial zoning fronting on
Middlebelt which is the way his property is zoned at present. He stated further
the property owners do not want the hospital in this area.
Mr. Humble felt that to rezone this property to R-2 would be spot zoning. He stated
there was considerable area elsewhere more suitable for a hospital.
Mr. Robinson stated he would like to give this matter further study before acting
upon it.
Mr. Angevine stated that Petitions Z-426 and M-179 would be taken under advise-
ment for further study.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-425 by D & A
Builders, Richard D. Skoglund and Jack A. Wixson who are asking that the zoning
classification on property located on the Southwest corner of Pembroke andBrentwood
Avenues and also theSouth 60' of tl,e East 150' of Parcel Z58a located approximately
300 ft. South of Pembroke in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 1 be rezoned from RUFB to
R1 A. Mr. Skoglund was present.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
There was a brief discussion among the commissioners as to the depth of the lots
and whether there were any homes in the area. It was determined that Hearthstone
Subdivision with 60 ft. lots :wag just north of said property.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-356-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Petition Z-425 by D & A Builders, Richard D. Skoglund and
Jack Wixson for a change of zoning in the Southwest 1/4 of Section
1 from RUFB to R1 A, the City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-425 be granted
for the reason that the land herein sought to be rezoned either
backs into or is in close proximity to Hearthstone Subdivision
which is platted into 60 foot lots, and
1[0 FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in
the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November
25, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit
Edison Co., Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Tele--
phone Co., The Consumers Power Company, City Departments and petitioners
as listed in the Proof of Service.
Y
2711
IIThe Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
4
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-427 by Stanley
L. Satovsky who is asking that the zoning classification on property located on the
East side of Levan Road and North of Lyndon Avenue in the Northeast 1/4 of Section
20 be rezoned from AGB to R1A.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Mr. Harsha asked if it was practical to rezone this property as it is or should more
land be added to it. Mr. McCullough stated that this property was in close proximity
to other land recently rezoned to R1 A.
Mr. Okerstrom asked if R lA was for 60 or 70 foot lots. Mr. McCullough answered in
this area Rl A meant 70 foot lots.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-357-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Petition Z-427 as submitted by Stanley L.Satovsky for
a change of zoning in the Northeast 1/4 ofSection 20 from AGB
to R1 A, the City Planning Commission dces hereby recommend to
the City Council that Petition Z-427 be granted for the reason
that this is the most logical use of this property as it is
IL: bounded on at least 2 sides by Rl A zoning, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in
the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November 25,
1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison
Co., Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Telephone Co.,
The Consumers Power Co., City Departments and petitioner as
listed in the Proof of Service.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-428 by Mr. & Mrs.
Adolf Altenburg who are asking that the zoning classification on property located on
the Southwest corner of Harrison and Broadmoor in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13 be
rezoned from RUFB to R1 A.
Mr. Greene stated that looking at the map shows that on the south side of Broadmoor
there are large lots and if this petition is granted it would be a wedge in the door
on that side of the street. On the north side of the street it is platted into 60
foot lots but what about the lots on the south of Bvoadmoor? Mr. Greene felt this
would be spot zoring.
Mr. Harsha felt that several lots immediately south of the one in the petition would
then be landlocked if they wanted to be used if this petition is granted.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
li:
Mr. Peter Merlie, President of the Madison Civic Association stated they wouldn't
be opposed to the rezoning, felt it would be good for the area as long as the frontage
of the lots were at least 60 feet.
Mr. & Mrs. Adolf Altenburg were present.
2712
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was
#12- -59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on
Petition Z-428 as submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Adolf Altenburg for a
change of zoning in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13 from RUFB
to R1 A, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to
the City Council that Petition Z-428 be granted for the reason
that the land faces Trojan Subdivision which is platted into
60 foot lots,
Mr. McCullough suggested that the Planning Commission hold this petition over in
order to permit him to work something out with the owner of the property to determine
a way so that the property south of the petitioner's would not be landlocked.
Mr. Kane stated he concurred with Mr. McCullough.
Mr. AngeNine stated there was a motion on the floor.
Mr. Walker stated he would withdraw his motion and Mr. Peacock stated he would with-
draw his support.
Mr. Angevine stated this item would be taken under advisement.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-429 by Arthur
Pollack who is asking that the zoning classification on property located on the
north side of Schoolcraft Road approximately 450 ft. East of Brookfield in the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 22 be changed from RUFB to R1 A. Mr. Pollack was not present.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Mr. Robert Pfeiffer, 32203 Barkley, asked what particu]r area was involved in the
petition. The area to be rezoned was explained to Mr. Barkley and others present
interested in this petition. Mr. Pfeiffer stated they would have no objection to
the proposed rezoning.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Kane;, supported by Mr., Walker and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-358-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Petition Z-429 by Arthur Pollack for a change of zoning in
the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22 from RUFB to R1 A, the City
Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council
that Petition Z-429 be granted for the reason that the subject
land is presently bounded on three sides by the zoning sought
by this petition, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the
official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November 25, 1959
and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co.,
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Telephone Co., The
Consumers Power.Company, City Departments and petitioner as
litited in the Proof of Service.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
2713
10 Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the Rosemor Manor Sub-
1 division located on the East andWest side of Hubbard Road between Schoolcraft and
Lyndon in the Southeast and Southwest 1/4 of Section 22 submitted by Arthur Pollack,
Fort Investment Company. Mr. Pollack was present.
Mr. McCullough submitted a letter dated December 14 from the Fire Department; a
letter dated December 15 from the School Board and a letter dated December 10 from
the Police Department. A letter dated December 11, 1959 from the Parks & Recreating
was submitted in which Mr. R. Girardin, Superintendent, states the Parks & Recreation
Department wishes to retain the proposed park site which has been included in the
Rosemor Manor Subdivision.
Mr. Robert Pfeiffer, 32203 Barkley, speaking for the Civic Association stated they
were not agreeable to the area for the park site being eliminated and included in
the proposed new subdivision. He stated that when they purchased their homes they
were led to believe that this would be a park area. Mr. Barkley stated that they
wish to request that this subdivision be denied if it means eliminating the park
area.
Mr. Pollack stated they had no objection to a park in this area. The property they
originally had purchased was what is now the school site. In 1953 they gave their
property for the school site and they in turn received this park site. Because of
the forty acre park proposed for the West side of Farmington and the South side of
Lyndon, it was thought this park site in Section 22 would not be needed, consequently
I: they included it in the Rosemor Manor Subdivision. They had been informed that the
City was not able to purchase this site and because of this they feel they should be
allowed to plat it.
Mr. McCullough stated that the petitioner had been informed that his plat included
the proposed park site. He asked Mr. Pollan .dhe was agreeable to submitting a
plat without the park site but Mr. Pollack hey did not wish to do this because no
definite date has been set to purchase the property.
Mr. Angevine stated that Mr. Girardin has recommended that this park site be retained.
Mr. Pollack stated if the City would offer to purchase the proposed park site, they
would be glad to eliminate it from the proposed subdivision but otherwise they would
rather go along with the present plat.
Mr. Robert Pfeiffer stated if the developer was speaking of the property west of
Farmington as a park site for their children, he was objecting because he would lot
like to see his children go across Farmington Road to get to a park. At the time
the park site had been designated it was not as necessary as it is now.
Mr. William Carter, 32230 Barkley stated they were very concerned about this park
site. He felt it was an ideal site for park development. He suggested that the
Planning Commission table this item for approx:i,matel3 a month inorder to give them
time to contact the Parks Sc Recreation, the School Board and the City Council to
determine if something could be worked out to retain this park site.
I: Mr. Harsha stated that before action could be taken on this proposed subdivision,
the taster Thoroughfare Plan would have to be amended due to the curve in Hubbard
as shown on the plat; also the retention basia. may or may not be acceptable to the
City Council. As for the proposed park site, at the last election the results
indicated that the people were against any money being spent for purchasing park
sites. There must have been a change of heart.
Mrs. Lillian Lillenig, 32314 Lyndon stated she was representing property owners along
2714
1[10 Lyndon Road lcho bought homes in this area because of the wooded area and the de-
signated park site for that area.
Mr. McCullough suggested that this item be taken under advisement until these
property owners can go to the City Council to determine if the park site can be
purchased and also he would write a letter to Mr. Hiltz, City Engineer, in regards
to the retention basin.
Mr. Angevine stated this item would be taken under advisement until some determination
is made by the City Council in relation to the proposed park site.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-431 by George
Pastor for the Livonia Baptist Church who is asking that the zoning classification
on property located on the North side of Schoolcraft between Farmington Road and
Brookfield Road, approximately 600 ft. West of Brookfield in the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 22 be changed from RUFB to R1 A. Mr. Pastor was present.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Harsha, and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-359-60 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Petition Z-431 as submitted by George Pastor for the Livonia
Baptist Church for a change of zoning in the Southwest 1/4 of Section
1E: 22 from RUFB to R1 A, the City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-431 be granted for
reason that the subject land is part of the Kimberly Oaks Plat #2
and because of an oversight it was not made a part of the earlier
petition, asd
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in
the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November
25, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit
Edison Co., Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Tele-
phone Co., The Consumers Power Company, City Departments and
petitioners as listed in the Proof of Service.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition V-52 by Arthur
Swanson who is requesting that an easement located along the South line of Lots 704
and 705 and the West 25' of Lot 703, Coventry Gardens Subdivision which are located.
on Rayburn between Whitby and Stamford in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 16, be vacated.
Mr. McCullough submitted a letter dated November 9, 1959 from the Dept. Pubic Works
a letter from the Michigan Bell Telephone Company dated December 7, 1959 and another
dated December 11, 1959; and a letter dated December 15, 1959 from The Detroit Edison
Company. Mr. McCullough stated the Michigan Bell Telephone Company has informed
the Planning Commission that they do not object to relocating the utilities in the
present easement with the understanding that Mr. Swanson will pay for any relocating.
IE: Mr. Arthur Swanson was present, and pointed out the new easement to the planning
commission members.
Mr. Peacock asked if the petitioner has contacted the other property owners of the
other lots. Mr. Swanson stated he owned all five lots involved.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
2715
_:_ Mr. Swanson stated that Detroit Edison has informed him that they have no utilities
in this easement and they have no objection to the vacating and that they will for-
ward a letter to the Planning Commission in effect to this. He also stated that
the Engineering Department has given permission to abandon the sewer located on
his property. He pointed out where the new easement is to be located.
Mr.Robinson asked if we had sufficient information to proceed to change our plat
sheets and record this new easement on the records. He further stated that a map
be submitted showing where the new easement is to be located.
Mr. McCullough stated he would contact Mr. Hiltz, City Engineer in relation to the
sewer located on this property.
Mr. Angevine declared that this item would be taken under advisement until adequate
information is received in relation to the location of the new easement and whether
or not it will affect the sewer facilities of adjacent property owners.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition V-53 by George
Pastor who is requesting that the west 100 ft. of Perth Avenue in Seiting Gardens
in theSouthwest 1/4 of Section 22 be vacated. Mr. Pastor was present.
Mr. McCullough submitted a letter dated December 1, 1959 from the Engineering
Deprtment and a letter dated December 15, 1959 from The Detroit Edison Company.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
I: Mr. McCullough stated it was necessary to vacate the portion of Perth as it was
being replatted in the Kimberly Oaks Estates Subdivision #2. It was intended to
curve Perth Avenue at this location.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Kane, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-360-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on
Tuesday, December 15, 1959 on Petition V-53 as submitted by
George Pastor for the vacating of the west 100 ft. of Perth
Avenue in Seiting Gardens in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22,
the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to theCity
Council that Petition V-53 be granted, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in
the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November
25, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit
Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell
Telephone Company, The Consumers Power Company, City Deprtments,
petitioner and abutting property owners as listed in the Proof
of Service.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
li: Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-430 by the City
Planning Commission on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether
or not to amend Section 14.0$ (a) of Article 14.00 of the Zoning Ordinance,
Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia. This is in relation to yard requirements
in the industrial zone.
Mr. McCullough stated that this amendment increases the side yard requirements
from 10 feet to 20 feet in the M-1 district. This was suggested by the Industrial
2716
Commission and approved by the Fire Department. At the present time the side
yard requirements in the M-2 district is 20 feet.
Mr. Walker stated that there was a new state law allowing a lot tobe split four
ties. He did not know what effect this new law would have on this amendment but
tnought it would be advisable to take this under further study. It has been
suggested that a minimum lot requirement be adopted instead of increasing the side
yards.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Mr. Angevine declared that this item would be taken under advisement.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was a petition by the City
Planning Commission on its own motion to determine whether or not Part I of the
Master Plan of the City of Livonia, should be amended to relocate Wayne Road in the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 28.
Mr. McCullough submitted a letter dated November 11, 1959 from the Chesapeake & Ohio
Railway Company.
Mr. Joseph Vanzo, 12066 Boston Post Road stated the Tri-Sub Civic Association have
no objection to a road going through because it is realized that a thoroughfare must
be established in that area in order to release the industrial area along the rail-
road track. The commission has received a plat proposed by us showing a type of road
for that reason and at the same time it is felt that this road will give the residential
ILarea a protection from the encroaching industrial area. Mr. Vanzo further stated that
their proposed road is somewhat different from what the Planning Commission has pro-
posed.
Mr. McCullough presented a map to the audience showing the proposed relocation of
Wayne Road.
Mr. Vanzo, after reviewing the map stated that the plat they presented to the com-
mission does not show Wayne Road continuing as shown on this one presented tonight.
Stated further they were confused as to the actual relocation of Wayne Road. They
have also heard that the gas station located on the Southwest corner of Plymouth and
Wayne is to be removed or set back due to the widening of Wayne Road. He asked if
it would be possible to have Wayne Road make a gradual turn commencing at that point
and if so,this would probably necessitate removing only one home and maybe none. We
would also like to obtain one or two of the maps so we may hcve a chance to study
this situation and if the Planning Commission could see in our way of thinking per-
haps we could have a meeting with them and have this matter cleared up.
Mr. Angevine stated that this is a County road and the Wayne County Road Commissioners
have been considered as well as the Traffic Commission of the City of Livonia, This
present plan is not a fast and hard plan but just a combination of feelings between
the departments. He further stated that perhaps a curve could be installed South of
P1ymtnith.
Mr. Vanzo stated they felt this would be more in their way of thinking to have the
I[: road curve south of Plymouth Road.
Mr. Angevine stated there was a need for continuity.
Mr. Willard Smith, 34990 Beacon Road asked if this plan is the definite plan and
is the centerline as shown on map the way it was advct'tised?
Mr. Angevine answered the map shows how it is proposed and how it was advertised.
2
Mr. Robinson stated that this does not mean that the road will 7 be as shown. It could
be changed.
Mr. William Caunt, 35260 Leon, member of the Traffic Commission fated that this
proposed layout in our way of thinking is a good start. The preliminary plan of
the State Highway would be a cloverleaf type intersection so as to give an easier
way, to go across Plymouth Road. We do not know what type of interchange the State
Highway Department prefers but this proposed plan does seem to corresponde with
some of their ideas. The Wayne County Road Commission is taking steps to have
another lane on Wayne Road South of Plymouth Road. But to do this, it would
necessitate cutting off the front yards of the property owners south of Plymouth.
This present layout seems to be acceptable by the Traffic Commission. It would be
wise to stick as close as possible to this plan.
Mr. D. Donaldson, 34125 Wadsworth suggested that the road could be altered to some
degree so as not to lose the homes that are to be eliminated.
Mr. C. Buckley, 34966 Standish, stated he was interested in the way the road starts on
theSouth side of Plymouth and felt that as far as the gas station was concerned, it
probably would be removed when Wayne Road is widened. Mr. Buckley further stated
that they were trying to live and maintain their residences and felt that this
plan would deprive them from doing so. Asked for a litie consideration by permitting
them to examine the plan and then meet with the planning commission so as to discuss
the problem with them and then make a decision.
Mr. Willard Smith asked if the map produced this evening is the one proposed? Stated
he had seen a map which previously took 60 ft. from his property. This present map
does not.
the
Mr. McCullough stated he would contact/other departments, State Highway, Wayne County
Road Commission and the property owners north of Plymouth and arrange a meeting with
the Planning Commission.
Mr. Angevine suggested that these people contact Mr. McCullough when they would be
available for a meeting.
Mr. Caunt stated that the Traffic Commission recommends the 120 ft. right-of-way.
The State Highway will take up 75%Of the cost if a 120 ft. right-of-way is
designated.
Mr. Charles Walker stated that the reason this came before the Planning Commission
is because they have been aware that there is a problem before the property owners
because of the proximity of the 14.-.1 district and that a plan has been proposed which
would reroute Jayne Road so as to give complete protection to the subdivision. He
further stated that there was no urgency in the matter and there was no reason why
the Planning Commission could not take time and come up with the best possible plan
for everyone. Mr. Walker continued that he was in favor with Mr. McCullough's
suggestion to have a joint meeting and work out a plan satisfactory to all of us.
Mr. Robinson asked Mr. McCullough if he had had an opportunity to discuss this with
Wayne County. Mr. McCullough answered that he had and they were in favor of this
roposed location of Wayne Road.
Mr. Angevine stated that this item would be taken under advisement until such time
that the plan could be examined more fully by the interested parties.
2718
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the proposed Denmar
Estates Subdivision submitted by Sterling Homes, Inc., located on the north side
II:
of Six Mile Road approximately 1300 ft. West of Wayne Road in the Southeast 1/4
of Section 8. Mr. Don Gaeke, designer, was present for the developer.
hr. McCullough submitted a letter dated December 10, 1959 from the Police Depart-
ment; a letter dated December 11, 1959 from the Dept. Parks & Recreation; a letter
dated December 14, 1959 from the Fire Department and a letter dated December 15,
1959 from the Livonia Public Schools.
Mr. McCullough informed the commission that the proposed subdivision was platted
to within 60 ft. of proposed Levan Road.
Mr. Harsha, Chairman of the Plat Committee stated this was one of their objections
to the plat and also some of the blocks appeared to be somewhat long. Mr. Okerstrom
suggested eliminating the sharpness of the curve on Pershing Drive.
Mr. Gaeke asked if the commission felt it would be necessary to continue the 34 ft.
marginal access street in front of Lots 1 and 28. They stated this would be
necessary.
Mr. Kane asked if the homes faced Six Mile Road? Mr. Gaeke answered they will all
face the side streets.
Mr. Greene stated he was concerned about the 60 ft. of land not in the subdivision
which lies between the subdivision and proposed Levan Road.
li: Mr. Gaeke answered this plat is within the limits of the developer's ownership.
They realize there is somewhat a problem because of the proposed designated
road. The Planning Commission could determine if the road could be relocated
further east in line with the subdivision or further west in order to have another
tier of lots facing Levan Road. There would have to be a 43 ft. dedication for
this road if it is relocated.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Mr. Harvey Wagenchutz asked what was the question in relation to the proposed
subdivision? Mr. Angevine explained the question raised was whether or not at some
future date this 60 ft. strip could be subdivided.
Mr. Walker stated he could see no alternative than to take this item under advise-
ment.
Mr.Angevine stated this item would be taken under advisement.
Mr. Greene asked Mr. Gaeke if there was a possibility of them buying this strip
and including it in the proposed plat.
Mr. Gaeke stated they have tried but have had no satisfaction. There is another
owner involved and at the time they platted this subdivision they foresaw the
1[40
problem of the proposed Levan Road. He asked if the commission would want an
answer to this before taking action on the subdivision?
Mr. Greene stated the approval of the subdivision will be affected by the decision.
Mr. Angevine asked if the ownership of the 60 ft. strip continued on the west side
of proposed Levan Road. Mr. Gaeke stated it was.
Mr. Gaeke asked if the commission would consider relocating Levan Road to the east
2719
if the developer would dedicate 43' for the road. Mr. McCullough stated they
would.
Mr. Angevine again stated this item would be taken under advisement.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the proposed Ellen Kay
Subdivision submitted by Elmdale, Inc., located between Middlebelt Road and Harrison;
situated on the North side of Five Mile Road approximately 350 ft. East of Middlebelt
and 1,000 ft. west of Harrison in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13. He submitted a
;letter dated December 10, 1959 from the Police Department; a letter dated December
11, 1959 from the Parks & Recreation Department; a letter dated December-14, 1959
from the Fire Department and a letter dated December 15, 1959 from the Livniia
Public Schools. Mr. Frank DeDecker and Mr. Schrubiner were present.
It was determined after examining the proposed plat that Garden St. should be
continued further north to connect with the proposed subdivision located in that
area.
Mr. Harsha felt that Betula Drive as shown on the plat eras too long. This street
should be shortened as it continues into the 1/2 street of Cavour. If this is
done it would mean the loss of one lot but the length of the street would then be
within the limits of the ordinance.
Mr. Walker asked if the 10' walkway easement would be dedicated to the City? Mr.
McCullough stated if Garden Street is continued north, it would be unnecessary to
have the walkway.
4
R
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who w hed to speak.
Mr. Peter Merlie, Madison Civic Associations asked how were they going to get in
and out of the subdivision. It was determined that Garden Street is to be cut
through north of Five Mile Road and Cavour is to be paved on the east half.
Mr. Harsha asked if Lot 21 is too small? It was dtermined this was an error in
drawing up the plans, Lot 21 is 60 x 120.
Mr. Okerstrom stated that in this particular area all the homes were set back on
Five Mile Road and all faced Five Mile Road. In this proposed plan, there are
houses facing side streets only.
Mr. Anderson asked if it was possible to split the first two lots on Garden in
order to have them face Five MileRoad ?
Mr. DeDecker, Engineer, felt there wasn't sufficient room to do this.
Mr. Merlie asked what will happen to the property between the present home on
Five MileRoad and the new subdivision. Will it be landlocked? Mr. Harry Wright
stated that it had been planned to use this property also in the new subdivision
but they could not come to terms with one property owner resulting it not being
1[: included in this present plan.
Mr. Harsha asked what did this have to do with this particular subdivision? The
developer does not have to show plans for other property.
The question was asked where were the easements for the Detroit Edison and Michigan
Bell Telephone Companies? The developer was informed this would have to be shown
on the plat before approval is given.
2720
Mr. H. Loeffler, 8042 Sorrento, Detroit, owners of the hardware store on Five Mile
Road and Cavour, asked what would become of their property situated east of their
II:
hardware store where the new subdivision's lots back up to at the rear part of their
property.
Mr. Angevine stated that due to the many questions aeked tonight this item would be
taken under Advisement. In answer to the question raised as to whether or not
notices would again be sent out, Mr. Angevine stated that no notice of future
meetings on this plat will be sent out. He suggested that those persons interested
contact Mr. McCullough for any information.
Ar. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-181 by Edmund
Bande who is requesting permission to operate a cry---cleaning plant in the addition
to Sheldon Center at 10970 Farmington Road on the East side of Farmington approxi-
mately 500 ft. South of Plymouth in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 34. Mr. Bande
was present.
Mr. McCullough stated that the required signatures had been received.
Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Kane, and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-361-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Tuesday, December 15, 1959,"theCity Planning Commission
IC: does hereby grant Petition M-181 by Edmund Bande requesting
permission to operate a dry-cleaning plant in the addition
at Sheldon Center at 10970 Farmington Road on the East side
of Farmington approximately 500 ft. South of Plymouth in the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 34, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to
property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments
as listed in the Proof of Service.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-362-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn
the Public Hearing on Tuesday, December 15, 1959 at approximately
10:45 p.m.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is
adopted.
Mr. Angevine called a recess at approximately 10:46 p.m.
The Chairman called the 110th Regular Meeting to order with all those present naw
1 who were present at the time recess was called.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the proposed rezoning of
the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28 as submitted by Joseph Vanzo on behalf of the Tri-
Sub Association. Mr. Vanzo was present.
Mr. McCullough stated that a motion should be made in order to hold a public hearing
to determine whether or not to rezone this area in accordance with the request from
2721
1: the Tri-Sub Civic Association.
Mr. Angevine asked if there is a change in the M-1 size. Mr. McCullough answered
it was approximately the same as before; the only change is the park site and the
change frcm R1B to RU.
Mr. Anderson asked if the RU district would stop at the possible new street north
of the subdivision? Mr. McCullough stated it would and also end at the new street
on the east end of the subdivision.
Mr. Angevine informed those present that the basic change is to upgrade the district
from R1B to RU.
Mr. Okerstrom asked what was the distance from the railroad to the north boundary
of the M-1 district? Mr. Angevine and Mr. McCullough stated.the M-1 goes to the
railroad.
Mr. Walker suggested that this item be taken under advisement until the exact
location of Wayne Road was determined.
Mr. McCullough stated this item was on the agenda only for a motion to hold a public
hearing. He also stated that it should be noted that the C-2 area had been increased
in depth because of the greater depth of the lots facing Plymouth.
Mr. Angevine stated this item would be taken under advisement as suggested by Mr.
I[: Walker.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-408 by the City
Planning Commission on its own motion to determine whether or not Section 4.32 of
Article 4.00, Section 5.06 of Article 5.00 and Section 5.57 of Article 5.00 .hould
be amended. (increased side yard requirements with attached garages in RL, RU and
RUF and 70 foot R1 Districts ) Public hearing 8/18/59, item taken under advise-
ment; study meeting 9/29/59.
Mr. McCullough stated that only the Section 5.57 would be taken care of at this
time. The fifteen foot side yard requirement between houses is acceptable to the
building industry. It is one foot less than what was originally asked. Section
5.57 only effects the RL lots.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr.Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-363-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Tuesday, August 18, 1959 on Petition Z-408 as submitted
by the City PlanningCommission on its own motion, to determine
whether or not Section 4.32 of Article 4.00, Section 5.06 of
Article 5.00 and Section 5.57 of Article 5.00 should be amended,
the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that just so much of Petition Z-408 be granted which
I[: relates to RL zoning for the following reasons:
(1) there is a unanimity of opinion in favor of increased side
yards on larger lots;
(2) this is the counter-proposal submitted by Slavik F .iilders,
Inc. as being acceptable to the building industry; fir*.' "
2722
said amendment to read as follows:
Section 5.57 All lots in RL Districts shall have two side
yards each having a width of not less than 6 feet and the
combined width shall not be less than fifteen (15) feet;
Provided however, that notwithstanding anything contained
in this Ordinance to the contrary, the minimum distance
between the house on one lot and the garage, breezeway or house
on an adjoining lot shall be not less than 15 feet, and this
distance shall not be reduced by any projections;
Provided further that this shall not apply to any lot in any
subdivision which has received final approval on the date of
the enactment of this p_oposal.
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in
the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of July 30,
1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison
Co., Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Telephone Co.,
The Consumers Power Co., City Departments as listed in the
Proof of Service.
The chairman declared themotion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-418 by Jack
C
Coleman, Unity Construction Company who is asking that the zoning classification
on property located on the Northeast corner of Schoolcraft and Levan in the Southeast
1/4 of Section 20 be changed from AGB to R1A, R-3 and C-2. Public Hearing 10/20/59,
item taken under advisement; regular meeting 11/10/59, taken under advisement;
study meeting 11/24/59. Mr. Zumstein, Enginesr for developer, was present.
Mr. McCullough submitted a revised proposed layout of the three different kinds of
zoning to the commissioners.
After a brief discussion, Mr. Kane made the following motion which died for lack
of support.
#12- -59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Tuesday, October 20, 1959 on Petition Z-418 as submitted
by Jack Coleman, Unity Construction Company for a change of
zoning in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 20 from AGB to R1A,
R-3 and C-29 the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council that Petition Z-418 be granted in accordance
with the attached map for the following reasons:
(1) the Southeast corner of this intersection was recently
rezoned commercial;
(2) the R-3 will supply the needs for any additional housing
needed by staff personnel at the new hospital;
1[: (3) the R-1 is harmonious with the surrounding land uses;
Mr. Peacock stated he would like to take this item under advisement for further study
until he knew more definite the actual size of the B-3 and R-1A zoning.
It was determined that the portion of the petition in relation to R-3 zoning would
have to be readvertised.
2723
Mr. Walker objected to R-1A being developed next to the R-3 zoning.
Mr. Coleman stated he did not intend to mix up the R-1 with the R-3.
Mr. Greene asked why R-3 zoning was necedsary.
Mr. Coleman stated it was felt that there probably would be demand for this type
of unit due to the proximity of the hospital. He stated it was also felt that
it would better to have the R-3 across from the hospital than the single home
resiL aces.
Mr. Walker stated that because this area was adjacent to the Felecian Sisters
property and because they have been quite busy due to the recent opening of their
hospital, I would like to discuss it with them before any action is taken. I am
not prepared to make a decision tonight.
stated
Mr. Angevine/that a tabling motion was in order.
Mr. Anderson stated he would prefer to have this item tabled or taken under advise-
ment until he had a chance to study this further due to the fact he had been absent
the last two meetings.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Anderson, supported by Mr. Walker and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-364-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby table
Petition Z-418 by Jack Coleman, Unity Construction Company
IE until the next regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, January
19, 1960.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Walker and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-365-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby
allow petitioner, Sheldon M. Futernick to withdraw Petition
Z-424 requesting a change of zoning from RUFB to R1A in
the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14.
The Chairman declared the moticn is carried and the foregoing resolution isadopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Kane, it was
#12-366-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on
Tuesday, November 10, 1059 on Petition Z-423 as submitted by
Harold E. Booth for a change of zoning in the Northeast 1/4 of Section
2 from RUFB to R1A, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council that Petition Z-423 be granted for the following
reasons:
1E:
(1) a tier of 60 foot lots is now located along the north side
of Norfolk Street;
(2) some of the existing housing is not of such quality as to
require larger lots on the subject land;
(3) our attorney's advise us that private deed restrictions are not
a proper matter for the Planning Commission to decide a petition
upon;
li: 2724
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published
in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of October
22, 1959 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit
Edison Co., Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., Michigan Bell Tele-
phone Co., The Consumders Power Co., City Deprtments and
petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Greene, Peacock, Walker, Harsha, Anderson, Okerstrom
Kane and Angevine
NAYS: Robinson
The Chairman declared the motion is canned and the foregoing resolutinn is adopted.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-178 byALlen G.
Thurman requesting permission to erect an A. & W. Root Beer Stand on the north side
of Plymouth Road between Farmington and McKinney approximately 400 ft. West of
McKinney in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 27. Public hearing 11/10/59, item taken
under advisement. Mr. Thurman was present.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Walker, it was
#12-367-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Tuesday, November 10, 1959 the City Planning Commission
IL does hereby grant Petition M-178 by Allen G. Thurman requesting
permission to ere-t. an A. & W. Root Beer Stand on the north
side of Plymouth Road between Farmington and McKinney approxi-
mately 400 ft. West of McKinney in the Southeast 1/4 of Section
27, subject,however, to the following conditions:
(1) outside music shall be inaudible at the nearest residential
property line;
(2) lights shall be reflected away from nearby residences;
(3) the building shall be erected not closer than 120 ft. from
the center line of Plymouth Road, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to
property owners within 500 ft., petitioner and City Departments
as listed in the Proof of Service.
Mr. Anderson asked where this drive-in restaurant was to be located. He wasnQt
sure of the location. It was determined this was to be located on the first lot
east of the White Owl Restaurant,
Mr. Peacock asked if Mr. Robinson would stipulate in his resolution that a pro-
tective wall is to be erected in addition to those conditicns already stated.
Mr. Robinson stated he did not feel this was necessary -- the ordinance requires
I[: a protective wall.
Mr. Harsha asked if the petitioner was going to run the business or someone else.
Mr. Thurman stated he would run the business himself.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
2725
AYES: Greene, Peacock, Walker, Robinson, Kane and Angevine
NAYS: Harsha, Anderson and Okerstrom
IL The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was a request from Edward L.
Chmiel to change the street Butwell to Richland Avenue in the Gawron Subdivision
located in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31. Mr. & Mrs. Edward Chmiel were present
along with Mr. & Mrs. Richard Sisko, 31830 Richland.
Mr. Chmiel stated his reasons for requesting this change. He stated that Butwell
did not run into Richland on a right angle but rather on a slight curve.
Mr. Robinson stated that the Engineering Department should be contacted in order
that they may change the street signs.
Mr. McCullough stated that a letter lad been received from the Detroit Edison Co.,
listing the change of addresses from Butwell to Richland.
It was determined that the Post Office and all other utility companies should be
notified of the change.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-368-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission having considered
the request of Mr. Edward Chmiel of the Greenwich Pointe
Civic Association and other citizens of the City of Livonia,
and having reviewed the street plan of the subdivision named
hereafter, does hereby recommend to the City Council that
Butwell Avenue in the Gawron Subdivision be changed in name
to Richland Avenue in order to provide a more consistent and
convenient scheme of designation for streets in the Gawron
Subdivision located in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Peacock, and unanimously
adopted, itwas
#12-369-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby
grant request from John Uzniz for a one-year extension
of the preliminary approval granted January 6, 1959 on
the Idyl Wyle Subdivision #2 and #3 located South of
Five Mile Road, East of Levan in the Northeast 1/4 of
Section 20.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough stated a request hid been received from Mrs. Lucille Garrett asking
that we reconsider our recommendation to cut down the C-2 zoning on the north side
of Six MilE Road, west of Middlebelt in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 11. After a
' brief discussion, Mr. Robinson made the following motion which was supported by
Mr. Okerstrom and unanimously adopted:
#12-370-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission having considered
the request from Mrs. Lucille Garrett, does hereby recommend
to the City Council that their original recommendation on
Petition Z-317 be amended by reinstating the existing commercial
2726
zoning at the Northwest corner of Six Mile and Middlebelt
Roads to comply with their policy of not disturbing such
existing commercial zoning
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-371-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve
statement from Mr. Albe Munson for the month of November, 1959
in the amount of $213.71 and further that it be forwarded to
the proper aepartment for payment.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-372-59 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby
approve statement from The Livonian for the month of
November, 1959 in the amount of $108.80 and further that it
be forwarded to the proper department for payment.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the approval of the minutes
for meetings held on November 10, 1959 and November 24, 1959.
IE: Mr. Harsha stated he wished to make two corrections in the minutes for Tuesday,
November 10, 1959.
He stated on Page 2686 it states ;SMr. Harsha suggested more decorum and more evidence
in relation to this specific case", which he felt was not complete. He felt that
it should be stated his reason for suggesting more decorum. He stated that he made
this statement because the petitioner, Mr. Koenig had passed out business cards to
the commission and the audience and had addressed his remarks to the audience instead
of the commission.
Mr. Harsha further stated that on Page 2686 it also stated that he said that the
petitioner is allowed open air sales under the RUFB zoning. This is incorrect;
Mr. Harsha stated that he had said that the petitioner is allowed greenhouses,
nurseries and truck gardens in the RUFB district.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was
#12-373-59 RESOLVED that, the minutes for November 10, 1959 and November
24, 1959 be approved as corrected except for that member who
was not present, he abstain from voting.
AYES: Peacock, Walker, Robinson, Harsha, Okerstrom, Kane
and Angevine
1[110 NAYS: None
NOT VOTING: Greene and A.iderson
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
2727
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was final approval requested
by S. Z. Wolack on the Meadowview Subdivisions #2 and #3 located North of Lyndon
and East of Idyl Wyle Estates Subdivision, formerly part of Merucci Bros. Subdivision,
given preliminary approval October 14, 1958 with conditions. Mr. S. Z. Wolack,
developer, was present.
There was a brief discussion as to whether or not the developer should be allowed
to split lots,which presently face Lyndon,so that they face the side street instead.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Okerstrom and unanimously
adopted, it was
#12-374-59 RESOLVED that, final plat of the Meadowview Subdivisions #2
and #3 in the Northeast and Southeast 1/4 of Section 20 and
the Northwest and Southwest 1/4 of Section 21, be given final
approval, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, inasmuch as it appears on th., :;cords that
tentative approval of said proposed plat was given by the City
Planning Commission on October 14, 1958; and it further appearing
that said proposed plat together with the plans and specifications
for improvements therein have been approved by the Department of
Public Works under date of April 6, 1959; and it further appearing
that a bond in the amount of $6,000 for Meadowview #2 and another
in the amount of $8,000 for Meadowview #3, pursuant to Council
resolutions #213-59 and #766-59, to cover the installation of
improvements has been filed in the office of the City Clerk; such
IL bond having been approved by RL, C. Kropf, Assistant City Attorney
it would therefore appear that all the conditions necessary to
the release of building permits have been met and the Building
Department is hereby so notified.
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was proposed Meadowview #4
submitted by S. Z. Wolack, located on the South side of Five MileRoad approximately
550 ft. East of Country Club Street in the IdylWyld Estates Subdivision in the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 20. Public Hearing 11/10/59, item taken under advisement.
Mr. S.Z. Wolack was present.
Mr. McCullough stated the only question raised at the last meeting was whether or
not marginal access streets should be required as they were in the Idyl Wyld Sub-
division further west.
Mr. Wolack objected to having the marginal aceess streets. He stated that the
homes side on Five Mile Road and that the garages for these homes would be on the
south side of the homes so that they will not be seen from Five Mile Road.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Walker, it was
I[: #12-375-59 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held
on Tuesday, NOvember 10, 1959, the City Planning Commission
does hereby give approval to the preliminary plat of Meadowview
#4 located in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 20, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to the
abutting property owners, proprietor, City Departments as listed
in the Proof of Service and copies of the plat together with
Vs
.:. 2728
notice having been sent to the Building Department, Superintendent
I[: of Schools, Fire Department, Police Department, Parks & Recreation
Department and Members of the Plat Committee.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Greene, Peacock, Walker, Okerstrom and Kane
NAYS: Robinson, Harsha, Anderson and Angevine
The Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. Angevine submitted and read a letter from Mayor Brashear dated November 17,
in relation to attendance of members of all commissions at their respective meetings.
Mr. Angevine also submitted and read a letter dated November 28, 1959 from the S.
& B. Swim Club.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimously
adopted, the 110thRegular Meeting of the City Planning Commission was duly adjourned
at approximately 12:30 A.M. Wednesday, December 16, 1959.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
i l� QNB
onard K. Kane, ecretary
ATTESTED:
R bert L. Angevine, airman