HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1962-03-06 .
3407
MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING AND THE
142ND SPECIAL MEETING OP THE CITY
- I:
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LIVONIA
On Tuesday, March 6, 1962 the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held a
public hearing and the 142nd Special Meeting at the City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road,
Livonia. Mr. Charles W. Walker, Chairman, called the public hearing to order at
approximately 8:05 p.m.
Members present: W. E. Okerstrom, James W. Watson, Jr. , Robert L. Angevine,
Charles W. Walker, Arthur Samuels and James Cameron
Members absent : Robert L. Greene, Leonard K. Kane and Dennis Anderson
Mr. David R. McCullough, City Planner, was present along with approximately 70 inter-
ested persons in the audience.
Mr. McCullough: The first item on the agenda is Petition Z-546 by David Phipps
who is asking that the zoning classification of property
located on the north side of Ann Arbor Trail and west of
Wayne Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33 be rezoned from
RUFB to PS and R-3.
There is no correspondence. •
iri Mr. David Phipps was present.
•
Mr. McCullough asked Mr. Phipps to inform the commission what he intended to do with
the property?
Mr. Phipps stated he intended to have a convalescent home on the PS property which
would consist of 50 units. It would be a one story brick building. On the property
fronting on Wayne Road he proposed to build apartments which would also consist of
approximately 50 units. It was estimated that the convalescent home would cost
$125,000 and the apartments would cost $632,000. It was contemplated to begin work
on both buildings at the same time. Although there was R-3 proposed for the property
fronting on Ann Arbor Trail also it was thought that only that portion fronting on
Wayne would be built first. The exit and entrance for the apartments teuld be on
Wayne Road. He continued by stating that it was planned to start as soon as it Was
permissible
Mr. Walker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak?
Mr. Chester Henning, 9747 Hougton stated he was concerned about the PS zoning. He
owns property immediately west of this area. He asked what type of zoning could he
obtain if the request for PS is approved. He did not feel anyone would want to build
a home next to the convalescent home.
Mr. Walker stated that the PS ^,_ne is usually used as a buffer between residential
and commercial. He felt that any use under the PS regulations would probably be
1: desirable - it could even be rezoned to another residential zone.
Mr. Henning suited this property has never been changed from RUF. He did not feel
they could use for single home residential next door to a convalescent home. He
asked if it would be possible to rezone his property to C-1 or C-2?
Mr. Walker answered that he could not determine now what could be done with his
3408
-property, it would be entirely up to the commission at the time it is presented to
them and it would depend upon the location and what type of zoning was requested. .
f Mr. Walker asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak?
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Watson, supported by Mr. Samuels, it was
#3-46-62 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on
Petition Z-546 by David Phipps for a change of zoning in the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 33 from RUFB to PS and R-3, the City
• Planning Commission docs hereby recommend to the City Council
that Petition Z-546 be granted for the following reasons:
(a) PS zoning is a natural buffer for the residential area to
the west; and
(b) if apartments are properly treated architecturally, such as
River Oaks in Dearborn, they are not harmful to surrounding
single family development; and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in
the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of February 14,
1962 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison
Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. ,
The Consumers Power Company, City Departments and petitioner as
listed in the Proof of Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Watson, Okerstrom and Walker
NAYS: Angevine
Mr. Walker declared that the motion was carried, therefore the foregoing resolution is
adopted.
Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-543 by the City
Planning Commission, pursuant to City Council's Res. #82-62 to determine
whether or not to amend Section 7.52 of Article 7.50 (RU District Regulations)
and Section 8.02 of Article 8.00 (RUF District Regulations) of the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Livonia. This is in relation to home occupations.
Mr. Charles Forrest, City Attorney,..arrived at approximately 8:20 p.m.
Mr. McCullough explained that at the time the change of zoning was adopted, many of
the people in the north half of the city would have been against the rezoning if
it had not been that the City Council at that time had stated that home occupations
would be allowed in the RUF district. This is the primary reason this is before
the commission. The proposed amendment is to remove the use from the RU regulations
and add it thereto to the RUF regulations.
Mr. Walker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak?
Mr. Austin Grant, 19815 Farmington Poad, stated at the time the master zoning plan
had been approved, about 21/2 years ago, people from the Gill Road Civic
Association and' others living west of Farmington between Seven and Eight
Mile Road to the city limits had indicated they would go along with the
Change from AG to RUF if the Council would retain the uses in RUF.. He
continued that somewhere along the line when the ordinance was prepared
for council action the pages were flipped and the AG uses were put in the
.
3409
RU instead of RUF.
Mr. Walker asked if there was anyone else in the audience who wished to speak?
A representative from the Livonia Urban Farms Association, Mr. Phillip Barrett,
19630 Gill Road, Livonia stated he concurred with the remarks made by Mr. Grant.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Angevine, supported by Mr. Watson, it was
#3-41-62 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on
Petition Z-543 as submitted by the City Planning Commission, pursuant
to City Council's Res. #82-62 to determine whether or not to amend
Section 7.52 of Article 7.50 and Section 8.02 of Article 8.00 of the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, Ordinance No. 60, the City
Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that
Petition Z-543 be granted for the following reasons:
(a) when the zoning ordinance was originally adopted, the promise was
made to certain residents of the northeast part of the city that home
occupations would be permitted in RUF zoning;
(b) they are now permitted in RU but not in RUF which is inconsistency
caused by en error when the ordinance was prepared;
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the
official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of February 14, 1962 and
notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co. , Chesapeake
& Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , The Consumers Power
I: Company, City Departments and petitioner as listed in the Proof of
Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Angevine, Watson, Okerstrom and Walker
NAYS: None
Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-545 by George
Klein who is asking that the zoning classification of property located
approximately 700 ft. north of Seven Mile Road, approximately 650 ft.
east of Purlingbrook and 750 ft. West of Middlebelt Road in the Southeast
1/4 of Section 2 be rezoned from R-1A to C-2.
There was a brief discussion as to the general location of this proposed rezoning.
Mr. McCullough stated that the developer had sold a portion of the original parcel
to the City for a library site and still another portion was sold off for the St.
Priscilla's Church. He needed this additional area for the parking of his proposed
shopping center. He has informed Mr. McCullough that he will announce the tenant
of the proposed department store and when they will begin building.
Mr. Walker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak?
ILIs4 Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Cameron, supported by Mr. Samuels, it was
#3-48-62 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on
Petition Z-545 as submitted by George Klein for a change of
zoni ng in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2 from R-1A to C-2, the
3410
City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council
I:: that Petition Z-545 be granted for the following reasons:
(a) the Planning Commission has previously set a policy of encouraging
the use of land at mile road intersections for commercial purposes
particularly where shopping centers rather than strip type commercial
can be accommodated;
(b) the location of this property with reference to the proposed and
existing commercial facilities on the other three corners of this
intersection preclude its use for residential purposes, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the
official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of February 14, 1962
and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Company,
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , The
Consumers Power Co. , City Departments and petitioner as listed in
the Proof of Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Angevine, Watson and Walker
NAYS: Okerstrom
Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is
adopted.
1[4. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-547 by Robert
Serota who is asking that the zoning classification of property located
between Deering and St. Francis immediately south of Hamlin Court in the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 1 be rezoned from P and RUFB to C-2.
The item following relates to this petition also. It is
a miscellaneous petition asking permission to construct a motel with
restaurant and privatewimming pool on the property located on the south
side of Grand River between Deering and St. Francis Street in the NE 1/4
of Section 1.
Mr. Robert Serota was present.
Mr. McCullough asked Mr. Serota to explain more fully the proposed motel plans.
Mr. Serota informed those present that none of the motel units would face any houses
on St. Francis. This development would cost approximately one million dollars and
it was hoped that they could start in the spring. The restaurant will seat approx-
imately 100 people. Mr. McCullough stated they were a little short on parking but
Mr. Serota has been informed that he will have to conform with the ordinance and to
do he will lose a few of the motel units. Mr. Scrota stated they were aware of this.
Mr. Walker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak?
Mr. Barth from the Mooney Real Estate Company, 19733 W. Seven Mile Road, Detroit
IL: stated his client, Gerald Taylor, owns a house on St. Francis which he is trying to
sell for him. He asked if this motel would adversely hurt the houses on the east
side of St. Francis? He stated the lots were all 40 ft. wide and most of the houses
there were on 40 ft. lots. He was concerned that the motel would hurt the value of
these houses.
Mr. Serota stated that the motel would not be of block construction, but would be
. 3411
of face brick construction. He did not feel it would hurt the area. 14-4bW Mee
fa: with the city ordinance the building would be set back 25 ft. from the street with
landscaping in front of it.
Mr. Mooney suggested that the residential lots on St. Francis not be used for the
motel. Mr. Serota stated if they eliminated these 5 lots, they wouldn't have sufficient
land to comply with the ordinances. He stated that the plan before the commission is
only a tentative plan in order to give an idea of what is proposed. All final plans
will have to conform with the city ordinances. The plan before the commission is only
a proposed plan, the final plan will follow this pattern quite closely.
The question was asked if there would be an outlet upon Deering from this motel. Mr.
Serota stated there would not be. Only on Grand River.
Mr. Taylor, 20408 St. Francis, :•bjected to houses on St. Francis having to face the
motel.
Mr. Barth stated that at the present time these houses and lots are approved by the
FHA but he felt that with this motel on the west side of St. Francis, the FHA would
not approve these lots for mortgages. He stated this should be considered. before
any final action is taken. He felt that the motel would go in at the expense of some
houses.
Mr. Walker stated he wouldn't want to say that this will enhance the property but
he felt that the development of this property would benefit the city on the whole
and that it wouldn't degrade the property around as some other uses allowed under the
commercial zone. Most of the property is on Grand River which is zoned for commercial
use and there are a lot of uses in the C-2 zone which would be worse than this
present use under discussion.
Ht. Taylor stated that developers have been coming in that area two or three years
trying to buy the property but it was always not for sale at any price.
Mr. Blair stated he did not think it was unreasonable to suggest that the developer
of this motel pay the difference to those people who would get hurt in the sale of
their property due to the motel being built in this area. He felt that $5,000 or
$6,000 would actually take care of the real difference for the three or four homes
that would be effected by this proposed motel.
Mr. Watson asked Mr. Serota if there was to be a greenbelt between the motel and
the houses across the street?
Mr. Serota stated that there was to be a 25 ft. set back on their side of the street
and that the ordinance states a greenbelt is required.
Mr. Watson suggested that the swimming pool be moved towards the rear so that it
would be closer to the residential homes instead of the proposed motel units.
Mr. Serota felt if this was done - it would be done at a loss of 50 units.
Mr. Blair stated he did not think it was out of line to expect the petitioner to
Irapay five or six thousand dolhrs to those people who would be hurt by this motel.
Mr. Taylor stated his house was valued at $7,000 at the present time.
Mr. Blair stated Mr. Taylor has three forty foot lots. One has a house on it,the
other two he was making into building sites. He felt that the motel would hurt the
3412
sale of these lots. At the present time these lots should be•worth.$1200 to $1500.
He felt that if the FHA knew of this motel, it would rule out FHA financing. The
1 house hasn't received FHA approval at the present time. He said that they would
know real soon if these two lots will be approved by FHA.
Mr. Walker informed Mr. Blair that he had no power to approve what Mr. Blair was
suggesting and he felt it was not proper to discuss it at a public hearing. In
addition he felt that if the Planning Commission did hold this item up for that
particular reason, it would not be legal.
Mr.Serota stated the only thing he could do for Mr. Taylor is to refer him to
their other two places and see the nature and type of building that was previously
built and let him reserve his opinion afterwards.
Mr. Angevine questioned the advisability of going ahead with the rezoning if the
petitioner did not have adequate parking facilities for the use he intended to use
the property for.
Mr. Walker stated this was only for rezoning but the petitioner would have to be
able to fill all the requirements of the ordinance before he would be able.to obtain
a permit to build the motel.
Mr. Angevine asked what happens if he can't conform to the ordinance?
Mr. Serota explained that the layout before the commission was only prepared so as
to be able to show the general scheme of the proposed motel. The final plans would
be very close to this layout. They would definitely coform with all building
I:i requirements and also the zoning ordinance as to the parking requirements.
Mr. Angevine asked what if after the plans are made it is found that they did not
have adequate land for this motel?
Mr. Okerstrom concurred that these things should be ironed out before any action
is taken.
Mr. McCullough said he was sure that the petitioner would lose approximately 10
units due to the parking requirements.
Mr. Serota stated there was enough flexibility in their plans to allow for
the loss of 10 units.
Mr. Walker asked Mr. Serota if he was pressed for time?
Mr. Serota stated they were not but they would like an answer as soon as possible
because of the fact that the petition has to be forwarded to the City Council for
action which will take time also.
Mr. Angevine asked if the petitioner loses 10 units due to the parking requirements,
would this be satisfactory to him?
Mr. Serota stated it would.
1:
Mr. Samuels stated that the ordinance requires that 60 percent of the property owners
within 500 feet distance from any part of the lot area involved do not object. Has
this been verified? Mr. McCullough stated the signatures of these property owners
were filed according to the ordinance.
3413
Mr. Watson suggested that in view of the objections raised from the audience, he
would like to see this petition held up for another two weeks so that the adjacent
I::
home owners could discuss their objection with the developer and possibly go and
see the other properties they have developed.
Mr. Walker stated this item would be taken under advisement until March 20, 1962.
Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-544 by the CPC,
pursuant to City Council's Res. #64-62 to determine whether or not to
rezone property located on the east side of Middlebelt Road approximately
150 ft. north of Clarita in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12 from RUFB to
C-2.
Mr. McCullough explained this petition had been referred to the Planning Commission
by the City Council because of an offer by the owners of the property in the
petition whereby they offer to convey to the City of Livonia certain property upon
certain terml and conditions to be used as a fire station site. The owners of the
property wish to use the north 150 ft. of the property for a proposed dining room
and are requesting that the zoning be changed in order to be able to do so.
Mr. Charles Eroombaugh, representative for the owners of the property, Chris and Vasalaki
Gerges, was present.
Mr. Broonbaugh explained that the proposed dining room would be 42'x 70' . He felt
it would be an asset to the community. There would be ample parking facilities.
The building would cost in the neighborhood of $35,000.
IC:
Mr. Angevine asked what was the zoning between this property and the commercial
zone south of Seven Mile Road. It was determined there was a portion of RUF between
the two commercial districts.
Mr. Walker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak?
Mr. Gus Davis, 18600 Middlel)elt stated he owned property in that area and he also
lived immediately south of the proposed fire station site. He had no objection to
the restaurant but this was the first timehe had !'card about the proposed fire
station site. He wondered if this fire station would effect his property. He asked
for more details on the proposed fire station as to what kind of building, how
many trucks, etc.
Mr. McCullough stated that the proposed fire station would probably be on the order
of the one jusc recently built on Middlebelt and Plymouth and also like the one
on Farmington and Seven Mile Rond. There are usually two fire trucks with
approximately eight men on duty at one time.
It was suggested that Mr. Davis Le sent more detailed information as to what kind
of building would be built upon this property. Mr. McCullough stated he would
take care of this.
Mr. Okerstrom asked if any plans had been made to dedicate the right of way to
Wayne County. Mr. Brookbaugh stated if the other property owners convey their
1[40
fright of way to the Wayne County, they would certainly do the same. Mr. McCullough
stated that this would have to be taken care of by the City Council.
Mr. Cameron asked if this was a chain type restaurant? Mr. Brookbaugh answered it I
was not.
C
f '
3414
Mr. Angevine stated that this strip type of commercial has not been successful
in recent years.
I:: Mr. Walker stated that the proposed senior citizens development east of this
property would probably limit this property from becoming residential. He further
stated that this item would be taken under advisement until the next meeting.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Watson, it was
#3-49-62 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the
Public Hearing held on Tuesday, March 6, 1962 at approximately
9:10 p.m.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Angevine, Watson, Okerstrom and Walker
NAYS: None
Mr. Walker stated the motion is carried and the public hearing is hereby adjourned.
Mr. Walker called a recess at approximately 9: 11 p.m.
* * * * * *
Mr. Walker called the 142nd Special Meeting to order at approximately 9:30 p.m.
with all those present now who were present at the time recess was called.
Mr. McCullough announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition Z-542 by
1 M. J. Sharpley who is asking that the zoning classification of property on the
west side of Middlebelt Road between Minton and Westfield in the Southeast 1/4
of Section 35 be changed from RUFB and R-2B to PS. Public Hearing 2/20/62 advise-
ment.
There was a lengthy discussion during which it was ascertained that the Library
Commission was in the process of locating new sites for future libraries and that
the property in Petition Z-542 was one of the sites being considered.
Several of the people in the audience stated that they would like action on the
petition tonight. They did not want to see this held up any longer - they preferred
to have the petition denied.
Mr. Walker asked how many were in the audience interested in this matter? There
were approximately 15 interested persons in the audience.
Mr. John Pashkowsky, 29421 Hathaway objected to this item being taken under advisement.
He insisted that the people in the audience be notified when this item will be
acted upon. Mrs. J. McIntosh, 29424 Minton concurred with Mr. Pashkowsky. She
stated they came tonight in order to see the proposed plans of the funeral home.
Mr. Walker instructed the secretary to notify those interested. He stated that the
Planning Commission would like the Library Commission to examine the site before
they make any decision. He informed Mr. Pashkowsky that since this is a special
meeting, he felt they had been more than just in allowing the audience to speak.
I: He concluded by stating that this item would be taken under advisement.
Mr. McCullough: Th!'_ next item on the agenda is the approval of revised plans
for the Jewish Hebrew School to be located on the north side of Seven
Mile Road, between Osmus and Auburndale in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 3.
3415
I!: Mr. McCullough stated the developers of the Jewish Hebrew School has asked that
the set back originally .determined at 176 ft. from the center line of Seven Mile
Road, be revised to 150 ft. They have indicated that with the 176 ft. it was
too restrictive.
W. Angevine stated if he remembered correctly, there were special reasons why
the set back was established at 176 ft. Mr. Okerstrom stated this was correct. The
176 ft. set back was established so as to correspond with the existing residences
on the street.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr.Ckerstrom, supported by Mr. Angevine, it was
#3-50-62 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the 142nd Special Meeting held by the
City Planning Commission on Tuesday, March 6, 1962, on a request
by King & Lewis,Architects to approve revised plans of the United
Hebrew School originally given approval on December 12, 1961,
by reducing the setback from 176 ft. to 150 ft. , the City Planning
Commission does hereby deny approval of said revised plans for the
reason that the setback as established in the original approval
was established in order to correspond with the existing residences
on Seven Mile Road.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Angevine, Watson, Okerstrom and Walker
NAYS: None
lij
Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Angevine, supported by Mr. Cameron, it was
#3-51-62 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission after carefully reviewing
Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia entitled, "Master
School and Park Plan", which plan was adopted by the City Planning
Commission on December 15, 1953 and amended from time to time and
revised on August 16, 19,0 and thereafter certified to the City
Council and filed with the Wayne County Register of Deeds in
accordance with law and it appearing that certain property herein-
after described should be deleted on such plan, the City Planning
Commission on its own motion does hereby order and establish a
public hearing to be held in the City Hall of the City of Livonia
to determine whether or not Part V of the Master Plan of the City
of Livonia should be ended so as to delete for future public
purposes the proposed pafk site in the West half of Section 15,
generally located in the flood plain of Bell Creek,
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that notice of the time and place of said
public hearing be published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City of Livonia and that proper notice by registered mail
be sent to each public utility company and railroad company owning
or operating any public utility or railroad within the City of
IL: Livonia in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public
Acts of 1931, as amended.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Angevine, Watson, Okerstrom and Walker
NAYS: None
3416
Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is
adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Watson, supported by Mr. Angevine, it was
#3-52-62 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission after carefully reviewing
Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia entitled, "Master
School and Park Plan", which plan was adopted by the City Planning
Commission on December 15, 1953 and amended from time to time and
revised on August lu, 19u0 and thereafter certified to the City
Council and filed with the Wayne County Register of Deeds in accordance
with law and it appearing that certain property hereinafter described
should be designated on such plan, the City Planning Commission on its
own motion does hereby order and establish a public hearing to be held
in the City Hall of the City of Livonia to determine whether or not
Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia should be amended so
as to designate the following described property for future public
purposes:
Parcel 02Nla - The W. 1/2 of the East 35 acres of
the W. 1/2. of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 2, except the north 112.0
ft. of the South 532.0 ft. thereof,
excepting from the above excepted
parcel the East 60.0 ft. thereof,
consisting of 10.90 acres;
11[: Parcel 02N1b - The North 112.0 ft. of the South
532.0 ft. of the West 1/2 of the
East 35 acres of the W. 1/2 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, except
the East 60.0 ft. thereof, consisting
of 0.58 acre;
Parcel 02N2 - The East 1/2 of the East 35 acres of the
West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section
2, consisting of 17.48 acres
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that notice of the time and place of said
public hearing be published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City of Livonia and that proper notice by registered mail
be sent to each public utility company and railroad company owning
or operating any public utility or railroad within the City of
Livonia in accordnace with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public
Acts of 1931, as amended.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Angevine, Watson, Okerstrom and Walker
NAYS: None
Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is a motion for a public hearing
to determine whether or not to amend Part I of the Master Plan, known
as the Master Thoroughfare Plan by reducing the width and relocating
Myrna situated in the West half of Section 15 .
3417
After a brief discussion it was determined that this item would be taken under
(I, advisement until a copy of the Master Thoroughfare Plan is available in order to
examine the immediate area. Mr. Walker stated this itemsould be brought up at the
next meeting.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Cameron, it was
#3-53-62 RESOLVED that, final plat of the Koloff's Sunnyside Estates Subdivision
located in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 20 and the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 21 be given final approval, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, inasmuch as it appears on the records that tentative
approval of said proposed plat was given by the City Planning Commission
on March 1, 1960; and it further appearing that said proposed plat
together with the plans and specifications for improvements therein have
been approved by the Department of Public Works under date of June 3,
1960; and further that a bond to cover the installation of improvements
will be filed in the office of the City Clerk and that said bond will
be approved by the City Attorney; it would therfore appear that all the
conditions necessary to the release of building permits will have been
met and the Building Department is hereby so notified.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Samuels, Cameron, Kane, Okerstrom and Walker
NAYS: None
NOT VOTING: Watson
1[1:
Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Samuels, supported by Mr. Watson and unanimously
adopted, it was
#3-54-62 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the
minutes for the meetings held on Tuesday, February 6, 1962 and
February 20, 1902 except for that member who was not present,
he abstain from voting.
Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Samuels, supported by Mr. Okerstrom and unanimously
adopted, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the 142nd Special
Meeting on Tuesday, March 6, 1902 at approximately 10:05 p.m.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
(/VI
ATTEST : W. E. Okerstrom, Secretary
Zar--afi
11, Cha les W. Walker, Chairman
9