Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1966-04-12 MINUTES OF THE 219TH SPECIAL MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING CP THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA 4747 On Tuesday, April 12, 1966, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, held the 219th Special Meeting and a Public Hearing at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Charles W. Walker, Chairman, called the Public Hearing to order at approximately 8:40 pome with approximately 10 interested persons in the audience. Members present: Charles W. Walker Raymond W. Tent John J. Ward Harry W rightman Donald Pollock Members absent: Marvin 0. Moser Myra Chandler Bob R1 Whitehead Donald Heusted Messrs. Harvey W.: Moelke, Mayor; Don Hull, Planning Director; John. J;Magy, Assistant Planning Director; Michael Farrug, Assistant City Attorney, were present, Mr. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 66-3-1-5 by Rodney Kropf, attorney for John O. and Dorothy Schroder; requesting to rezone property located on the south side of Six Mile Road, approximately 667 feet east of the centerline of Newburgh Road for proposed commercial development, from R-3-B to C-2. Rodney Itropf, attorrcy: representing the petitioners, stated that this par- ticular rezoning is to complete the neighborhood shopping center study that vas prepared by the Plan.aingDepartment. He stated that the original roues' inclu ed en area much closer to St. Timothy's Presbyterian Church and that the Planning Commission felt the area should be reduced in depth and took property from the south and added it to the east. In order to preserve greenery in the area, the Planning Commission is rezoning the corner piece of property to A-G and Mr. Kropf stated that the petitioners have agreed to follow the plan as prepared by the Planning Department. Rev. Carl Gunderson, 37737 ''ingsbury; Pastor of St. Timothy's Presbyterian Church, read a letter dated April 16, 1966 which was written by himself to the Chairman of the Planning Commission which expressed a concern for the nature of development planned fe. the property between the shopping center and church property: a request for a brick wall at the rear of the condo and a green buffer from the wall to I?ewburgh Road. He stated that it 3.s felt that the Planning Commission did an admirable job in planning . 'he commercial development, but also that improper development of the bu' _cr could �dctreet from the area and from the church property. ReveC•u-Nora;n rquested to know what the Planning Commission has in mind for this area, Mr. Walker stated that a masonry wpl1 would be required by ordinance a :3 that a rcluest for any ether co structlon would have to be gone into with the de- veloper and the Commission, a 4748 • Mr, Tent questioned if Revd• Gunderson had considered purchasing the bu. er strip and incorporating it as part of the church site since it is not desirable for residential or commercial development., Rev, Gunderson advised that they have sufficient acreage at the present. time and he does not feel that they should be forced into purchasing the property.° He further stated that the present site was purchased with confidence that good plans would be made for the entire area and if they _i: : be assured that a cont ructive use is planned for this property they would not be opposed to the commercial development. Mr, Pollock stated that he does not like to see commercial encroachment upon the church lands and it was his suggestion that the land be used for professional service which he thought would be a transition between the church and commercial uses, and questioned how the church would feel about that type of use for the land. Rev, Gunderson stated that it seems this would have definite possibilities en:: would not be objectionable. ' r„ Hull stated that his first recommendation would be that the St. Timothy IL Church acquire this piece of land and increase their church site; second ; Lhat a small denomination church make use of the small parcel of land and third, that the property be held for residential. IlrIve Gunderson stated that churches try not to toate right next to each ocher but try to think in terms of serving a community and not being in competition with each other. He stated that he couldn't think of any chu.:c:. _:-.wt would be interested in this small two acre area. ::r, Hull stated that the parcel isabout three acres in size and a small church could be put in there to help serve the church needs of a large ..css section of the area. Rev„ Gunderson stated that he felt the Commission should consult with some „_rch planner before making a decision regarding another church locating `:::ore. .:„ Kropf stated that no action is being taken at this time to develop this piece of property and Rev. Gunderson can be assured that no obnoxious :, n will go in there and when something does go in it will be something ::at will blend in with the church and commercial use. e being no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this .petition•. . „ Walker advised that this item will be taken under advisement. IL _, •,, Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is PETITION 66-3=1-6 by the City Planning Commission requesting to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Six Mile Road and Newburgh Road in the a1o_thwest 1/4 of Section 17 from C-2 to A-G. ._;.._re being no one present wishing to be heard regarding this petition nWalker advised that this item will be taken under advisement. 4749 Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is PET FICN 66-3-3 ;y the City Planning Commission requesting to vacate a portion of Lyndon Avenue adjacent to lots one and two of Dutch Mill Gardens Subdivision in Section 24. J.1.20 Hull advised that this vacating is a technicality and that this pies^ o'_ property should be taken out of the City's jurisdiction and be maintr` by the owners of the adjacent lots. Mere being no one present wishing to be heard regarding this petition -_, Walker advised that this item will be taken under advisement. Wrightman announced the next item on theAgenda is PETITION 66-3-7-5 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion: to amend Part V of _ne Master Plan, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to incorporate r tan acre parcel of land located at the southeast corner of Haggerty Road ~.d Philips in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 6. '_, Walker questioned if this ties in with the acquisition of property ,:aat will be acquired with the aid of federal funds. Hull advised that it does and that the legal department requested thrt tiiis ten acres be added to the prior request for 90 acres. Tare being no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this pet itIc= Walker advised this item will be taken under advisement. +14-66-66 RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the Public hearing held on Tuesday, April 12, 1966 at approximately 9:10 p.m. * . Walker, Chairman, called the 219th Special Meeting to order at lroximately 9:30 p.m. with approximately the same number of persons _ 1 the audience. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is PETITION 66-3-1-5 y Rodney Kropf, attorney for John O. and Dorothy Schroder, requesting -o rezone property located on the south side of Six Mile Road, approxima :c! 7 feet east of the centerline of Newburgh Road for proposed commercial elopment, from R-3-B to C-2. a motion duly made by Mr. Tent and seconded by Mr. Pollock, it was -67-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on April 12, 1966 on Petition 66-3-1-5 as submitted by Rodney 4750 Kropf, attorney for John 0. and Dorothy Schroder, requesting to rezone property located on the south side of Six Mile Road approximately 667 feet east of the centerline of Newburgh Road for proposed commercial development, from R-3-B to C-2, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-3-1-5 be approved for the following reasons: (1) It is consistent with the overall commercial development plan that has been adopted by the PlannirgCommission; (2) It is consistent with the detailed plan for this area that has been approved by the Planning Commission; (3) This is a revision of the previously submitted zoning petition that has been recommended by the Commission to more logically develop commercial facilities within this area; FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian Observer and City Post, under date of March 23, 1986 and notice of such hearing was sent to the'Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and Consumers Power Company, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Pollock Walker, Wrightman, Tent NAYS : Ward ABSENT: Whitehead, Chandler, Moser, Heusted Mr„ Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolition Mr. Pollock stated that during the public hearing, Mr. Kropf, attorney for the petitioners, made some statements to the effect that the land south of this church site would never be used for anything that would not enhance the property and questioned if Mr. Kropf would volunteer a letter to this effect on behalf of the property owner. Mr. Kropf stated that he will submit a letter to the effect that when they are ready to do something with this piece of property we will work with the church and City Planner to work out a compatible, aesthetic development that the church will not think as obnoxious to their use. Mr. Hull stated that to the best of his knowledge this Commission has never committed itself to any use for this property and that nothing has been promised to these people or has been discussed with them. I IL4751 Mr. Kropf stated that they do not know what they want to do with this property as yet. Mr Pollock questioned if Mr. Kropf will submit a letter to this effect, Mr. Kropf replied, yes, Mr. Wrightman stated thatpossibly the church is being placed at a point on the property that may make it impossible for development of the adjacent southerly land, Mr. Hull stated that once the church is built if they don't put it in the right place it might preclude the transfer of property to accommodate other uses. Mr Tent questioned if all they need is a waiver use approval. Mr, Hull replied, yes. Mr. Walker stated that the Commission is highly concerned about this entire area because it is felt that some of the better homes in the City are being built here and that is one reason why so much time was spent on a plan for it. He further stated that the Commission will be equally concerned when the owner of the property adjacent to the church site comes in with plans for its development. Rev. Gunderson stated that he is gratified that the Commission has given this matter their attention and appreciates the resolutions that are being entered into the minutes. Mr, Walker stated that Rev. Gunderson will be advised when any petitions come before the Commission regarding this property and that anything that will be detrimental to the church property will not be allowed, • Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-3-1-6 by the City Planning Commission requesting to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Six Mile Road and Newburgh Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 from C-2 to A-G. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman and seconded by Mr. Tent, it was ILV #4-68-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on April 12, 1966 on Petition 66-3-1-6 as submitted by the City Planning Commission requesting to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Six MilaRoad 'and Newburgh Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17v from C-2 to A-G, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition66-3-1-6 be approved for the following reasons: , IL 4752 (1) This action effectuates the overall mutually agreed upon concept for development of shopp ng facilities within this area; (2) It will allow for the aesthetic development of a shopping center within this area; FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonian Observer and City Post, under date of March 2.3- 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company; Michigan Bell Telephone Company and Consumers Power Company, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the follo ir : AYES; Ward, Tent, Pollock, Walker, Wrightman NAYS : None ABSENT; Moser,Moser, Whitehead, Chandler, Heusted, Mr, Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoir. resolution adopted, Mr Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-3••3-4 as submitted by the Cf;'ty Planning Commission requesting to vacate a portion of Lyndon Avenue adjacent to lots one and two of Dutch Mill Gardens Subdivision in Section 24, U; :..i a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman and seconded by Mr. Pollock, it was: n-69-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having be-n held on April 12, 1966 on Petition 66-3-3-4 as submitted by the City Planning Commission requesting to vacate a portion of Lyndon Avenue adjacent to lots one and two of Dutch Ai_ll Gardens Subdivision in Section 24, theCity Planning Can•- mission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-3-3-4 be approved for the following reasons; (1) It is of no value to the City; (2) It can best be used and maintained by the adjacent i owner; I 4753 FURTHER RESOLVED; that notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the LivonitIn Observer and City Post under date of March 23, 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit 'Edison C--^pany, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, City Departments, and petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Tent, Pollock, Ward, Walker, Wrightman NAYS : None ABSENT: Whitehead, Chandler, Moser, Heusted. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is PETITION 66-3-7- 5 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to amend Part V o_f n. Master Plan, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to incorporate a ten acre parcel of land located at the southeast corner of Haggerty Roc cd Philips in the southwest 1/4 of Section 6. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Tent and seconded by Mr. Pollock, it was #4-70-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 o_ the Public Acts of Michigan 1931, as amendecj, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia having duly held a Public Hearing on April 12, 1966 for thepurpose of amending Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Liv-r.L:, entitled "Master School and Park Plan", the same is iic cb - amended so as to include a ten acre parcel of land locrIted at the southeast corner of Haggerty Road and Philips in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 6, as a park site (10.00 acres) for the following reasons: (1) There is a need for this type of facility in this <1:es; (2) There is a need for this type of facility to servica the needs of our entire population; (3) This is a logical addition to the land in this a-raa already designated on the Master School and Par's AND, having given proper notice of such hearing as by Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as a.r.:: :aa_',_, the City Planning Commission does hereby adopt 'said an 1- ment as part of the Master School and Park Plan of the of Livonia, which is incorporated herein by referenco., �.a 4754 II: came having been adopted by resolution of the City Planning Commission, with all amendments thereto, and further that this amendment shall be filed with the City Council, City Clerk and the City Planning Commission; and a certified copy shall also be forwarded to the Peg-ster of Deeds for the County of Wayne, for recording, A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: L-' Pollock, Ward, Tent, Walker, Wrightman NA YS : None ABS FNT: Whitehead, Chandler, Heusted, Moser Mr, Walker, Chairman, declared the foregoing motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted, Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-10-1-37 by Harold Thomas - equesting to rezone property located between Beatrice and Middlobelt load. approximately 671 feet south of Five'Mile ""-d, `u the Mr. Walker statc., th's item will be taken under adviseme?.t until the IL petitioner can submit a plan for review, discussion and action by the Planning Commission„ Mr, Ward questioned if there has been any notice from the petitioner that he intends to cut back on the amount of commercialzoning he is requesting,, Mr, Kropf stated the petitioner's feeling that the rear 65' could be des:gn_ated for earl-'_ng and that they will try to come up with a plan that might he n, ratable to this Commission. Mr;, Pull stated that 65' does not really accomplish anything regarding the Commission's concern about granting this quantity of commercial zoning to do )thing more than ac'ammodate a nursery operation, and that it does not cut do-;,-1 on the size of this complex. He further stated that he does not feel they are getting any closer to the request that the Commission made,. Mr, Kropf stated that that is a matter of opinion and that it is felt that a plan can he submitted that will satisfy the Commission. 1'7, 'Tull staled thti'. 's a reasonable thing to do but questioned if the plan 'could still have a potential of accommodating a large commercial complex rather than an addition to the existing nursery operation. Mr. Hull Lu=ther steted that he thought the Commission's request for Ur, I ropf to outline the exact are? that his client feels is necessary fo:: the expanded nursery operation should be complied with. 4 4755 I r, 'goner stated that the Commission does not want to create sonc :h;ng fat could turn into a large shopping area. Kropf stated that he understands that and he has talked again -with his client and they will try to coin ^ rp with a plan that will make t.-ea Commission and him happy, Walker stated that this pet itbn will be taken under advisement, Mr, Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is PETITION 66-1-3-•1 by Rodney C. Kropf, attorney for Volk-Rovsek Building Company requestir.g to vacate the southerly four feet of the twelve foot easement adjacent to the north line of Lot 96 of Golfview Meadows Sub #1 in Section 17, Mr, Kropf stated that the Engineering Department has discovered that underground pipes have been caved in and requested that the Comniss .on table this iter: until the possibility of relocation of the storm sir'.: c•en he considered„ Mr, Walker, Chairman, stated that this item will be taken under advicameet, Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on tie agenda is Topsoil Bond Release, TA 48, located on the east side of Farmington Road rpproxi:ret2ly lfC0 feet south of Five Mile Road and approximately 1E00 feet north of Schncicraft in the West 1/2 of Section 22, I. , Walker advised that there arc two letters in file regarding this 'bond release; one from Frank Kerby, Inspection Department, dated March 28; 1:'C5, E, g r i t o dated Mere� _��, and one from G. Siemert, E:z�i�:�=.er_n� Denar m..nt, 2 1066, stating there are no objections to the release of the bond filed :n connection with this top soil permit, Uren a motion duly made by Mr., Wrightman and seconded by Mr„ Padlock, it was RESOLVED that, pursuant to the recommendations and report of the Bureau of Inspection dated March 23, 1956, the City Planning Commission does herein au'thc-ice the release cf the bord, ;, 12e2.33-5e, dated April 22, 1959 in the amount of $11 ,000,00 by United States F:del r''.y end Guaranty Coma ny: 415 Griswold, Detroit, Michigan,. 53226 posted with Ole City in connection with topsoil remove]. operations performed under Permit No., 49 (Application TA-•'43; :caved to Jack B, Anglin, 42750 Grand River, Novi, Michigan; it aoi;e.ars from the abc . : report that all ordinances, rules and regulations 110: gave been complied with and theCity Clerk is herein authcrieed to do all things nccef y.-., to full performance of this resolution, I 4756 A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES : Ward, Pollock, Tents Walker, Wrightman NAYS: None A79ENT: 7 'itehead, Chandlers Heusted, Moser :"r„ [Talker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted, Mr„ Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-2-6-3 by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Council Resolution 73-66, to determine whether or not to amend Ordinance 543 (Zoning Ordinance) by adding Section 18.53 (Illegal Parking of Motor Vehicles) Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Tent azd seconded by Mr, Wrightman, it was #4•-72-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant toe public hearing having been held on M;irch 7'1, 1966 onn Petition 66-2-6-3 as submitted by the"City Planning Commission, pursuant to Council Resolution #73-66, to determine whether or not to amend Ordinance #543 (Zoning Ordinance) by adding Section 18.53 (Illegal Parking of Motor Vehicles), the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the Cit_T Council that Petition 66-2-6-3 be approved for the following reasons: (1) It will increase the aesthetic quality of our City; (2) It will eliminatethe menace of parked vehicles that detract from the safety and well being of our City; i TY TITER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was pub:. "hedin the official newspaper, the Livonian Observer and City Post, under date of March 9, 1966, andubtice of such hearing was sent to tb Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and Consumers Power Company, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. "A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES : Pollock, Tent, Ward, Walker, Wrightman NAYS: None =ENT: Whitehead, Chandler, Heusted, Moser, Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted, i 4757 Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is a motion by the City 'Planning Commissions on its own motion. to hold a public heating to determine whether or not to readopt a Master Civic Center Plan, Part II of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia. Mr, Rodney Kropf, attorney representing Mr. Gotsis and Mr. W agenschutz, stated that they have cooperated with the City in regard to setbacks even though they desired to build closer to Five Mile Road and feel that their plans comply with aesthetic control. He stated the City Council passed a resolution to the effect that they do not intend to purchase the land and that this resolution was vetoed and overridden then sent back to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission then approved their site plans. Mr. Gotsis and Mr; Wagenschutz feel they are being victimized and Mr. Wagenschutz has a mortgage that is running out. They feel the Planning Commission is a reasonable board and that their being allowed to proceed will not hurt the public at large. Mr. Kropf made a plea on behalf of his clients for action on the petitions. Mr. Hull advised Mr. Kropf that the only action being taken this evening is a motion to allow the Commission to hold a public hearing on the area outlined on the map. Mr. Kropf stated that if this proceeds he hoped that individual rights do have a place on the scheme of things and that these building permits are desired and it is felt that they should not have to wait that long for them, Mr, Hull stated he believed this area is already designated as part of the Civic Center plan which is somewhere in the archives of the City. Mr. Walker stated it was part of the Civic Center plan at the time it teas approved by the Commission. Mr, Hull stated his belief that Mr. Walker is correct. Mr. Kropf stated that that is correct.' Mr. Walker stated that the corner was excluded because he (Mr. Walker) sat on the Board when this case was taken to Court on Katzts Cleaners and that there are files to prove that this area was designated on the Master Plan. Mr. Wagenschutz stated he has never seen a map like that and that Westmore was the westerly limit of the Civic Center designation. hir. Pollock questioned if, when the Planning Commission submitted the'parcel of land to the Council for purchase and they said it was not feasible, did that preclude the petitioners from picking up building permits. 4758 Mr. Kropf stated that what prevents them from picking up building permits is the Ordinance that requires Planning Commission approval because the property is within 300 feet of theCivic Center area. He further stated that all plans have been approved and Mr. Wagenschutz wants his building permit and feels he is entitled to it. Harvey W. Moelke stated that he thinks it might be important to bring the Commission up to date oft the possibility of finding funds to purchase this property. The Council, he stated, passed a resolution that they did not have funds to Purchase this property. With the passing of the parks proposal one of the provisions is that we would be able to pay off the existing debt ,on a park site we are now purchasing. This will free $105,000.00 of City Funds and the City Council will have money in the general fund to buy the subject property and the reasons given in the Council 's resolution would no longer be valid. Mayor Moelke further stated that he would agree with Mr. Kropf and Mr. Wagenschutz that they have the right to use their property or be paid for it. Mr. Hull stated that this is one last effort to assure them of that. M7.7. Kropf questioned if the Commission would consider passing a resolution to the City Council to request that they make a determination on this matter once and for all. L1r, Hull stated that a meeting has been requested with Council to get this matter resolved, and in acting in the best interest of the City the Com- mission feels they have done right. Mr. Walker stated the Commission's feelings that they should either be allowed to sell the property to the City or to use it and he could see no reason why a letter could not be forwarded to Council to bring the possibility of purchasing the property to their attention and to _'form them that the Commission desires some immediate action on their part so that we can dispose of the petitions before us. Mr. Kropf stated he appreciates that and will give the City a chance to make a decision. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Tent and seconded by Mr. Wrightman, it was #,'4-73-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 23.01 of the Zoning Ordinance (No. 543) of the City of Livonia, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be geld to determine whether or not to readopt a Master Civic Center Plan, Part II of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia; being more particularly described as follows: 10; That part of the N.W. 1/4 of Section 22, T. 1 S., R. 9 E., City of Livonia, County of Wayne, Michigan described as I 4759 beginning at the N.W. corner of Section 22; thence S 88° 29' E. along the 'North line of Section 22, 1976.82 feet; thence S. 10 16' W 1316,40 feet to a point on the North line of Taylor Gardens Subdivision as recorded in Liber 86, Page 50, Wayne County Records; thence N 88° 29' W 143.00 ft. along said North line to the N.W. corner of said subdivision; thence 5:. 1° 16' W„ along the West line of said subdivision 501.00 feet to a point in the North line of Kimberly Oaks Estates Sub- division as recorded in Liber 83, pages 70, 71 & 72, Wayne County Records; thence N 88° 32' 30" W. 1838.50 feet along said line as extended to a point on the West section line of Section 22; thence N 1° 25' E along said West section line 1817.35 feet to the point of beginning; IT IS FLRTHER RESOLVED, that a hearing be held and notice be given as provided in Section 23.01 of the Zoning Ordinance (No; 543) of the City of Livonia and that there shall be a report submitted and recommendation thereon to the City Council, Al roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES : Ward, Walker, Pollock, Tent, Weightman NAYS : None ABSENT: Whitehead, Chandler, Heusted, Moser. Lr, Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing ^olutio n adopted. `L!-71_66 RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held on February 15, 1966. i:,c , a motion duly made by Mr. Pallock and seconded by Mr, Wrightman _:t was -75-66 RESOLVED that a letter be submitted to the City Council requesting that the matter of the purchase of the land as referred to by Mr. Kropf, being Lot No. 306 of Grennada Park Subdivision No, 1 and parcel 2211, be resolved and since the park issue has been voted favorably upon perhaps the financial situation of the C-7:.7 has changed. 2. roll call vote on theforegoing resolution resulted in the follo:aing: AYES: Tent, Ward, Walker, Pollock, Wrightman NAYS : None ASSENT: Whitehead, Chandler, Heusted, Moser Nee Walker, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing .,.^o1ut_on is adopted. 9 4760 Upon a motion duly made by Mr, Tent, seconded by Mr. Moser, and unanimously adopted, the City Planning'Commission does hereby adjourn ta^ 219th Special Meeting held on April 12, 1966, at approximately 10:30 p,.n., CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Harry Wrigf man, Setary ATTESTED• &r s W. Walker, Chairman i