Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1966-09-06 L 4895 MINUTES OF THE 225TH SPECIAL MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY, OF L1'VONTA, On Tuesday, September 6, 1966 the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held the 225th Special Meeting and a public hearing at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan, Mr, Charles W. Walker, Chairman, called the public hearing to order at. 8:40 p.m. with approximately 85 interested persohs itt the audience. Membez's Present: Charles WI Walker Raymond W4 Tent Mrs. Mimi Singer Harry Wrightman Dohald Pollock Mrs4 Myra Chandler Marvin Moser Donald Heusted Members Absent; John J. Ward Messrs, Don Hull, Planning Director; John J. Nagy, Assistant Planning Director; Robert Menzies, of the Planning Department; David Perry, Asst. City Attorney; and Daniel Andrew, Industrial Coordinator were also present. Mr. 'Jalker announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 66-7-1-19 by Vincent L. Burton requesting to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Five Mile Road and Sunbury Avenue in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24 from RUF to C-1 for erection of retail stores. Petitioner , Vincent Joseph Burton of 30595 Beechwood, Garden City, was present and was represented by Mr. Clarence Charest, attorney. Mr. Charest advised the Commission that his client is the ownet of the lots in question; that on Lot #1, adjacent to petitiostts property, is a Chicken Delyf_;ht which makes it almost impossible for him to use his property for residential purposes because of odors, etc. therefrom, and stated that this was the reason for the request of change in zoning to the C-1 classifica- tion to erect retail stores. Mr. Wrightman Esked what type of business petitioner anticipated for this property. Mr. (lharest stated petitioner would build along the rear of the property. He stated that petitioner was a plumbing contractor and would put his office in tie building, which would have additional shells to be rented, Mrs , Singer inquired as to the present use of lots 6 to 11. Mr. Charest advised that they were residential at the present time. Mr. Wrightm an asked if petitioner would have outdoor storage, etc. Mr. Charest answered, no. Mr. Tent asked where cars would be parked. , 4896 Mr. Charest stated parking would be in front of building - in accordance with the present code. Mrs. Chandler asked Mr. Charest if he realized that if there is erroneous parking use he would need a waiver. Mr. Charest answered, yes; but that petitioner contemplates parking along the front; does not expect to run into problems. Mr. Moser asked what the depth of the property is. Z='. Burton replied, 180 feet. Mr. Moser asked what size building would be erected. Mr. Charest said they had no site plan at present but they would have the necessary parking. Miss Geraldine Hicks, 28535 Five Mile Road, stated that she represented her grandmother whocxans lots 6 and 7 right next door to the property in question. She asked who the petitioner could rent the property to. 14 to Mr. Walker advised that this would depend upon the uses in a C-1 district. M-. Hull read the uses from the zoning ordinance. Miss Hicks asked if people in the surrounding area could object to certain tenants. Mr. Walker advised her that they could not - once this petition passes the Commission the only thing that could be complained of would be the use i it is a nuisance. He advised her that she could object to the petition ac such t.;night. Miss Hicks then went on record as an objector. Mr. Walker advised that this item would be taken under advisement. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-7-1-22 by Rodney Kropf for Frank J. Volk, requesting to rezone property located on the south side of Margareta Drive in Section 7 from R5C to R7 for erection of multiple dwel.:_ngs., Mrs. Chandler asked Mr. Kropf if he represented the original people who owned this property when they tried to build a cluster subdivision. Mr.. Kropf answered no - he believed it was Mr. Ponder. He said they ran into engineering problems when it reached Council and subsequr:r. . the property was sold to his client. Mc. Walker advised that a petition had been received from Melody ?'a -)_ Subdivision with regard to this petition. 4897 Mr. Kropf advised the audience that the owner of the property is a builder; he built Golf view Subdivision; that Mr. Volk has no intention of running traffic into Melody Subdivision. He suggested that the City Planning Commission take this matter under advisement so he can meet with the Civic Association and the planners, to work out any problems; that the proposed multiple dwellings would not be a nuisance but a first class multiple dwelling; he stated that it would be a high tax base with few children. He stated that to the west of the property will be the expressway; to the east is a golf course; to the south is undeveloped property; and advised that the traffic pattern could be worked out to avoid Melody Manor Subdivision, Mr. Krcpf further stated there would be enough green area, trees, etc, to hide theuse of the property which would be approximately in the m_'_ddle of the property. He again stated he would like to meet with representatives of the civic association on the matter. Mr. Wrightman expressed his opinion that the parcel involved is a very large piece of property. He said Mr. Kropf indicated that only a portion of the property would be used for this operation and asked what the balance of the parcel would be used for. Mr. Kropf stated that under the ordinance, multiple dwellings must have greenbelt and open space around perimeter, that only the interior portion will be used. Mr. Wrightman asked hou many units would be constructed. Mr. Kropf stated that b7 the ordinance he can build 11 or 12 per acre. Mr. Walker advised Mr. Kropf there were 108 signatures on the petition and approximately one-third of those people were in the audience tc abject. Mr. Joseph H. Lemieux, who signed the petition as President of the Civic Association, spoke for the organization stating his agreement that they should meet with Mr. Kropf; that the complaints were set forth in their letter; but added that there was now an additional complaint, that being Mr. Kropf's statement that the multiple dwellings would service the community college. He went on to say that his association was in receipt of a ld ter from the community college stating that their need in this regard was nill. Mr. Walker advised that this matter would be taken under advisement. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda was Petition 6C.-7-1-17 by Dooley and Wilder requesting to rezone property located on the northeast corner of Farmington Road and Curtis Avenue in the northwest 1/4 of Section"l0 from R-1 to P.S. to permit construction of law offices and medical or dental offices. Mr. Walker asked if anyone was present to be heard. 4898 ILMr. Dooley spoke in behalf of himself, Mr. Wilder and Dr. Sullivan. He advised the Commission that they wished to build a law office and dental office. He informed them of the reasons they wished to relocate their office; i.e. the forthcoming expressway, future service drive and race track traffic, etc. He said it would be approximately one and one-half years before they actually build, that they would be the only occupants, there would be no other tenants. He had photographs which he showed the Commission of the proposed building, which he felt would not depreciate the value of any adjacent residential dwellings. Mr. Tent suggested the possibility of locating elsewhere inasmuch as there is quite a bit of land already Zoned P.S. which is vacant; in fact approx- imately 40%, as Mr. Hull stated, was vacant. Mr. Tent suggested a location such as Livonia Mall. Mr. Dooley said he had already checked into such locations to find that they cannot afford to locate on such property due to the high cost of the land, it is a case of pure economics. Mr. Tent stated that with so much vacant P.S. land already in the City he coulc' not see granting petitions such as this for new property not included in the Master Plan. Mr. Wrightman asked where the photographs of the proposed building were taken. Mr. Dooley stated it is the office of Dr. Bernard Lyons on Grand River in the t City of Detroit. Mrs. Chandler asked Mr. Hull if there were parcels of land which were not yet rezoned to P.S . in the City but which were possibly being thought of along these lines. Mr. Hull stated there are areas which it is felt would be better zoned to P.S. or Commercial than the property in this petition. Mr. Walker asked Mr. Dooley if they had an option on the property. Mr. Dooley answered yes, with the understanding that if the property is not rezoned petitioner will forfeit what they had paid. Mr. Frank M. Gray, 7335 Puritan Avenue, Detroit 38, Michigan stated'he owned lots 211 and 212 on Westmore and if this petition is approved, rather than build his home as planned, he will sell. Mr, John "arkovich, 18248 Farmington Road, Livonia, stated that he owned property to the north of the premises in question; that he bought his home two years ago and had to follow all the City's rules and regulations for building in his particular zoning classification; invested approximately $20,000,00; and stated that if Mr. Dooley can come along and buy at residential prices and rezone to P.S. thus making a gain,the residents would lose what Dooley would gain. He said if this happens he will sell. 4899 Mr. Ray Whitman, 18234 Farmington Road, Livonia questioned the width of the lot mentioned in the card (60*) as against the 84' width of the property in question. Mr. Dooley explained that the card explained the minimum width of the lot for the particular classification. Mr. Whitman asked what petitioner would do regarding parking of cars. Mr. Dooley said he would do everything according to the City ordinances. Mr. Walker advised the audience that petitioner would have to return for waiver use approval at which time he would have to present a site plan and the Planning Commission would then see that petitioner does everything necessary. Mr. Whitman said he did not see why petitioner comes into residential land for commercial building. Mr. Walker advised him that Mr. Dooley had already explained that the reason was purely economic. Mr. Michael Gray, 18434 Westmore, repeated what was previously pointed out, that all the residents will lose what Dooley gains; asked if there would be tax reductions if their home values drop. Mr. Carl Crandell, 18215 Westmore objected to anything but residential being allowed on that corner. Mr. Dooley advised the audience that commercial and P.S, are two entirely different classifications. That with professional use the type of business and building that would be there would not take anything away from neighbor- ing residential property. Mr. Whitman asked if P.S, is allowed, would Commercial follow. Mr. Dooley said, no. He added that the Planning Commission judges each petition on its own merits. Mr. Whitman stated he would not like to see this petition approved Mr. Walker stated that this matter would be taken under advisement, Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-7-1-18 by Forest Lawrence requesting to rezone property located approximately 160 feet north of Five Mile Road approximately 600 feet east of Middlebelt Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13 from RUF to P for additional parking space. Mr. Clarence Charest came forward, representing the petitioner. He stated that petitioner desires to erect a commercial building compatible with his zoning, He added that although he has enough parking area petitioner would prefer to have this zoning change to give more parking area to the rear with the building on the front portio.. Petitioner has a proposed lease with a beauty shop. 4900 Mr, Wrightman asked Mr. Charest if the business to be serviced by this parking exists. Mr. Char_�st said it does not. Mr. Wrightman added that if there is nothing there yet, how can petitioner say he needs parking area. Mr. Charest stated that the petitioner wants to know that at the time they do build there will be adequate parking. Mr. Pollock stated that he did not know how petitioner would get to the rear parking lot. Mr. Charest said there would be a driveway which would be at least 20, wide. Mr„ Wrightman stated he would like to see what petitioner has inmind for driveway, etc. Mr. Walker asked why parking would not be in front. Mr. Charest stated that 601 would come off the front for road, leaving 1001 and petitioner felt that this would not be adequate for building and parking area. Mrs. Chandler asked if this parcel is landlocked. Mr. Nagy stated that this is "split zoning" with the front Commercial and the rear RUF. He added that he feels this requires study on the use of this land before the Commission acts on it. Mr. Okerstrom, in the audience, asked the Commission what the requirements were with regard to protective wall. Mr, Hull stated that this man would be required to put a protective wall along the P zoning; if not, it would have to go along the .north line of the Commercial zoning to the north between parking area and R-7 zoning and also to the west between parking and RUF and to the east also. Mr, Walker stated he would like to have this matter go back to the Planning Department for further studycf this and the entire property in the area. Mr. Charest stated he would like a study made with the possibility of making the entire parcel C-2. Mr. Walker stated that this matter would be taken under advisement. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-8-2-17 by Steve Polgar requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to use building located on the southwest corner of Farmington Road and Myrna for a real estate office in addition to law office. 4901 Petitioner, Mr. Polgar, was present and advised the Commission that he wishes to lease portions of his building for 1•:a1 estate and insurance purposes, the reason for his request for waiver use approval. Mr„ Walker stated that this matter would be taken under advisement. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-8-2-18 by Lonnie Adams for American Lutheran Church requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to construct a church on lots 10-12 inclusive, of Winfield Estates Subdivision, located on the south side of Seven Mile Road between Gill Road and Laurel in Section 9. Mr, Lonnie Adams was present in behalf of petitioner. He explained that the American Lutheran Church has an expansion program under way and this is a part of it. He brought sketches to the meeting of the proposed church for the Commission to see. He advised that the parking would be in the rear. Mr. Walker stated that he had gone to the site and feels it is a good location for a church but would like one amendment to their site plan, that being ingress and egress at Seven Mile Road as well as Floral, and would appreciate petitioner working this out with the Planning Director. Mr, Adams advised that this posed no problem and he would do this. Mr. Tent asked how large the congregation would be. Mr, Adams advised that at present there is no congregation; that they look to start a new congregation; there would be a seating capacity of 220 to 225. Mr. Tent asked what the ultimate size of the congregation would be. Mr. Adams stated that it depended on how much it can grow. He said they would like in time to convert the entire present building into a Sunday School and fn.11owship hall, and build a new sanctuary. He said the petitionerswould build as soon as they get a permit. Mre, Chandler asked if this would be a Mission Church. Mr. Adams said yes, that he had built several for this same ptitioner. He further said that the parsonage would be erected at the rear of the property. Mr. Walker stated that the right-of-way has been obtained. Mr, Carl W. Knapp, 34600W. Seven Mile Road asked how the parking wculd be handled and Mr. Adams explained the plans, parking etc. to him, Mr. Walker advised that this matter would be taken under advisement. 4902 Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-8-7-9 by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to provide for the incorporation of property located on the west side of Stark Road immediately north of Frost Jr. High School in Section 21. (Parcels T,U1,U2 and V). Dr. Friedrichs, Chairman of the YMCA in Livonia asked the exact acreage of the parce _ the %Tao adyi^ed it is approximately 30 acres, He stated that the Y is thinking in terms of 8 or 10 acres, further adding that they had discussed this acreage with the owner and with the Parks and Recreation; he said their frontage would run between 40% to 50% and the depth would be whatever is necessary - as soon as the architect submits the recommended measurements same will be submitted to the Commission. Mr, Hull said this could be made a part of the park plan now and amended later when they purchase it. Dr. Friedrichs said it was his understanding that a waiver use would have to be entered into. Mr. Walker stated that this matter would be taken under advisement. (0110 Mr, Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is preliminary plat approval of Globe Industrial Subdivision located on the north side of Plymouth Road approximately 210 feet east of Newburgh Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29. Submitted by Samuel Hechtman for Practical Home Builders, Inc. Mr, Walker asked how many acres were involved in this parcel. Mr. Hull answered, 65 acres. Mr, Spalding, of Spalding DeDecker and Associates, Engineers, of Birmingham, Michigan, stated that he was present to represent Mr. Hechtman, He said the land covered by this plat is presently M-i, located between Plymouth Road on the South and A mrhein Road on the north, on the east is an existing subdivision, Plymouth Levan Industrial Subdivision, and Detro_! Edison tower. Proposed railroad spur to come from C & 0 into the property along the eastern line will serve 7-acre lots along the eastern line as well as property on the western part of the adjacent subdivision, Mr. Walker stated that this petition covers an industrial subdivision made up of 30 lots varying in size - large lots to the east, smaller abutting residential property along Newburgh Road with access of traffic being north and south c-it of the industrial subdivision onto Plymouth and Amrhein Roads, 4903 Mrs. Lillian Thompson, 11962 Newburgh Road, Livonia objected saying that this would come up to her back door, and asked what would happen to the property of those living on Newburgh Road. Mr. Walker stated that her property would stay as is, they would only be allowing land already zoned industrial to be used as such. She stated that they have been there for 20 years and were told back then that no factory would ever be built there. Mr. Walker stated that it cannot be moved away; the property must be used as industrial. Mrs. Dina Gladman, 11800 Newburgh Road asked if there was any guarantee that the fact^ries built there would be good and not odorous, etc. Mr. Pollock stated that these same persons were in when a small industrial plant was to be built on their street ; the Commission had several meetings with their group; he reminded them that at that time the Commission had pointed out to them that the land immediately behind them was zoned M-1 and at that time no one said anything about it. Mr. Hull stated that this preliminary plat could be forgotten but immediately thereafter 2 or 3 factories could be put there without coming befo:'e the IL' Planning Commission. Mr. Hechtman said that he purchased the property in 1954 and it was M-1 then. Mrs. Gladman asked if the factories would be built right near their lot line. Mr. Andrew, Industrial Coordinator, stated that the setbacks would be 201 on parcels under an acre and 50* over an acre in size. Mr. Walker stated that they would face a new road. He advised the residents that the Commission can control and protect the residents in the area. He stated that tte Commission wants the right kind of industry, nothing at the expense of the home owner, Mr. Singer questioned whether there would be a fence or wall between the residences and the subdivision. Mr. Andiaw said there was no requirement for a wall; suggested possibility of a greenbelt treatment. Mr. Walker asked petitioner what his thoughts were along this line. Mr. Hechtman said he purchased the land in 1954 as industrial zoning; he would like to use theproperty for other than industrial but has been told le1 that the city wants it to remain industrial, therefore he will develop 4 , 4904 it on that basis. He discussed the possibility of a wall, etc, with the Commission and Mrs. Chandler suggested that if the cost was so great to build a wall Mr, Hechtman might add it to the price of the lots as he sold them, as a condition that they erect such a wall. Mr. Pollock stated that several industrial subdivisions have been put in the City of this type; in many instances they are an asset to the City and suggested to Mr. Hechtman that he would think this would also be an asset to the City. Mr, Hechtman stated yes, or he would not put it up. He went on to explain the many expenses he had already incurred and all the land he had already given up for right-of-ways, etc. and said that to put up a wall he would have to raise the price; he could make it a deed restriction. Mr. Hull stated that he sympathizes with the residents but they are in the path of industrial building; suggested the possibility of seeing of anything could be worked out to purchase the property and put same to industrial use. Mr, Hechtman stated that there are seven houses on the east side of New- burgh Road between Plymouth and Woodview Drive which he has attempted to buy but has not been able to do so. He also felt that industrial land s C should not abut residential land, there should be, something betwien'ii+t« dustrial and residential - if everything on *ewburgh was industrial, the people there could sell on that basis to thdse who want industrial lands, Neb ieehtman atnted that he•hadno objection to corking•out a condition y. ,, for the Will along Newburgh, where,there ere residences, :: , :. • • Mr, Hull asked:if''he mould put a wall whore there ate residences. only' ` ° ; or along all five residential land, Mr. Hechtman said it would be a uniform wall along all residentially zoned land whether occupied or not. He stated he did not like a greenbelt treatment because no one takes care of it, planting strips do not usually work out. The question was raised about the use of Newburgh Road, which is a dirt road, by heavy trucks, etc. with the industrial complex being built, as to the paving of same and the residentialoaners having to pay for same. Mr, Walker stated that this would be the case, even'if this petition had not come up; the road is there, so is the zoning, and the requirement of the road improvement - whether the land is used or not. 4905 Mr. Hull said that with regard to assessments it is the responsibility of the Legislative Body of the City, and equating of formula varies; it is not always proportional to the people abutting it. Their needs are cons idered. Mr. Pollock assured the audience that the commission would work with the developer to see that something good is built here. Mr. Walker stated that this matter would be taken under advisement. Upon a motion duly glade by Mr. Wrightman and seconded by Mr. Tent, and unanimously adopted, it was #9-137-66 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby' adjourn the public hearing held on Tuesday, September 6, 1966 at approximately 11:00 p.m. Mr, Walker, Chairman, called the 225th Special Meeting of the Planning Commissirn to order at approximately 11:15 p.m. with approximately fifty interested persons in the audience, yr. Walker announced that the first item on the agenda is Petition 66-7-1-19 by Vincent L. Burton requesting to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Five Mile Road and Sunbury Avenue in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24 from RL'F to C-1 for erection of retail stores. Upon a motion by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously adopted, it was #9-138-66 RESOLVED, that pursuant to a public tearing having been held on September 6, 1966 on Petition 66-7-1-19 as submitted by Vincent L. Burton requesting to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Five Mile Road and Sunbury Avenue in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24 from RUF to C-1, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-7-1-19 be denied for the following reasons: (1) this constitutes strip commercial zoning in an area where this type of use should be reduced rather than increased; (2) granting this petition would establish a precedent which would further increase the quantity of strip commercial development along Five Mile Road; strip commercial devel- opment is detrimental to the City because= I (a) the points of access to traffic streets are so numerous that they conflict with the flow of transient traffic; 4906 (b) the distance between stores is usually too great for pedestrian access, thus increasing the amount of vehicular activity in the area; (3) this petition is in conflict with the Planning Commission's over-all Master Plan of the City; FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonian Observer and City Post, under date of August 17, 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company, Petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda was Petition 66-7-1-22 by Rodney Kropf for Frank J. Volk, requesting to re- zone property located on the south side of Margareta Drive in Section 7 from R-5-C to R-7 for erection of multiple dwellings. Mr. Walker stated that this matter would be taken under advisement, pending a meeting between the petitioner and Melody Manor Resident's Association. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda was Petition 66-7-1-17 by Dooley & Wilder requehting to rezone property located on the northeast corner of Farmington Road and Curtis Avenue in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10 from R-1 to P.S. to permit con- struction of law of fires and medical or dental offices. Mrs. Chandler recommended that petitioner get together with the Planning Director to reconsider his location. Mr. Walker asked petitioner's feeling on this. Mr. Dooley stated that he appreciated the feeling of the Commission but would prefer to have a vote on the petition as is. On motion by Mr. Pollock, seconded by Mr. Heusted, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-139-66 RESOLVED that pursuant to a public hearing having been held on September 6, 1966 on Petition 66-7-1-17 as submitted by Dooley and Wilder requesting to rezone property located on the northwest 1/4 of Section 10 from R-1 to P.S, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City 4907 1[1: Council that Petition 66-7-1-17 be denied for the following reasons: (1) the site is physically small and unrelated to existing land use and zoning; (2) it is a use that is not compatible with adjacent zoning land use; (3) it is in conflict with the Planning Commission's over- all Master Commercial Plan of the City; FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonian Observer and City Post, under date of August 17, 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and Consumers Power Company, Petitioner and City Departments, as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. 1[0 Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-7-1-18 by Forest Lawrence requesting to rezone property located approximately 160 feet north of Five Mile Road approximately 600 feet east of Middlebelt Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Sention 13 from RUF to P for additional parking space. Mr. Walker stated that this matter would be taken under advisement for further study of the entire shopping complex at the northeast corner of Five Mile Rond and Middlebelt by the Commission. Mr. Wal:-er announced that the next item on the ageda is Petition 66-8-2-17 by Steve Polgar requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to use building located on the southwest corner of Farmington Road and Myrna for a real estate office and insurance office in addition to law office. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Moser, seconded by Mr. Tent, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-140-66 RESOLVED, that pursuant to a public hearing having been held on petition 66-8-2-17 on September 6, 1966, as submitted by Steve Polgar, requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to use the building located on the southwest corner of Farmington Road and Myrna, in IL Section 16, for a real estate and insurance office in addition to law office, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-8-2-17 be approved for the following reasons: 4908 (1) the additional uses proposed are compatible with the existing uses within the structure and throughout the exist- ing area. (2) the proposed additional uses will in no way tax the facilities related to the existing structure; FURTH IR RESOLVED, notice of the above public hearing was further sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Ckairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Commissioner John Ward joined the meeting at approximately 11:25 p.m. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-8-2-18 by Lonnie Adams for American Lutheran Church requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to construct a church on lots 10-12 inclusive of Winfield Estates Subdivision, located on the south side of Seven Mile Road between Gill Road and Laurel in Section 9. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Pollock, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-141-66 RESOLVED, that pursuant to a public hearing having been held on Petition 66-8-2-18 as submitted by Lonnie Adams for American Lutheran Church requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to construct a church on lots 10-12, inclusive, of Winfield Estates Subdivision, located on the south'side of Seven Mile Road between Gill and Laurel in Section 9, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-8-2-18 be approved, subject to the following conditions: (1) that the parking lot have access to Seven Mile Road; (2) that the access to Seven Mile Road be recorded on the plat to be approved; for the following reasons: 4909 (1) it will not be detrimental to the adjacent land use; (2) it is of such size, shape and location so as not to present any major problems to the area and to the City; FT.RTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above public hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-8-7-9 by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to provide for the incorporation of property located on the west side of Stark Road immediately north of Frost Jr. High School in Section 21 (Parcels T; Ul; U2; and V). Upon a motion by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Ward, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-142-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on September 6, 1966 on Petition 66-8-7-9 as submitted by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to provide for the incorporation of property located on the west side of Stark Road immediately north of Frost Jr. High School in Section 21 (Parcels T; Ul; U2; and V), for the following reasons: (1) there is a need for expansion of the facilities that are now located on the adjacent Ford Field; (2) there is a need for this type of facility in this sector of the City; (3) there is a need for this type of facility to serve the over-all needs of the City; and, having given proper notice of such hearing as required by Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission does hereby adopt said amendment as part of the Master School and Park Plan, Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, which is incorporated herein by reference, the same having been adopted by resolution of the City Planning Commission, with all amendments thereto, I: and further that this amendment shall be filed with the City Council, City Clerk and the City Planning Commission; and a certified copy shall also be forwarded to the Register of Deeds for the County of Wayne for recording. 4910 Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted, Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda was the preliminary plat approval of Globe Industrial Subdivision located on the north side of Plymouth Road approximately 210 feet east of Newburgh Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29 Mr. Pollock asked if in regard to the plat presented the Commission has any future say as to the location of the plants on the lots on the west side of Globe Road in the event this is approved. Mr. Walker said that the Commission has no further requirements to be met. On motion by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Moser, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-143-66 RESOLVED that, 'pursuant to a public hearing having been held on September 6, 1966, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that the preliminary plat of Globe Industrial Subdivision located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29 be approved subject to the following condition: (1) that the proprietor of the industrial subdivision will include in the protective covenants which will run with the land a clause to the effect that when property on the west side of Globe Road which abuts residentially zoned property is sold, the purchaser will erect a uniform masonry protective wall on the common boundary line between the industrial andresidential parcel of land for the following reasons: (1) it is of sufficient calibre to justify our approval; (2) it is consistent with the development of the industrial corridor through our City; FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to the abutting property owners, proprietor, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service and copies of the plat together with notice have been sent to the Build ing'Department, Superintendent of Schools, Fire Department, Police Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and members of the Plat Committee. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. 4911 Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-6-1-15 by Naldo Bucci for Rocwall Company requesting to rezone property located on the east side of Osmus Avenue approximately 175 feet north of Fargo Avenue in Section 3 from RUPA to M-L as proper extension of the existing land use on the south side of Eight Mile Road. Nicbolai Slithasked permission of the Chairman to make a short statement on this matter. He stated that he was appearing before the Commission as attorney in behalf of the North Central Civic Associatioh and wanted to ' have the association's objection to the approdal of the petition, #66-6-1-15, placed on record; he stated that the Commission had been previously served with petitions bearing 400 signatures objecting to said petition; he stated that the members of the Commission who appeared the previous Thursday evening before the Civic Association heard the objections of the individual members of the association who are residents of the area. They objected because of the piece meal type of development which the Commission'will allow and permit in the industrial development of this area; that is, allowing the petitioner to have one segment, leaving all other residents remaining unsure as to the future development of the property. In conclusion, he stated that the City Planning Commission is representative of the city government and all citizens of Livonia - citizens who are members of this association - ILand the civic association wished to go on record and ask this Commission to listen to their plight in considering this petition and respectfully ask that the petition be denied. Commissioner Ward asked Mr. Smith what credentials he had to speak for the association, Mr. Smith made it explicit that he did not appear in behalf of the association previously but at the executive board meeting of the civic association they made the recommendation which was approved, and the officers were duly authorized to retain him. Mr, Ward. statedte is shocked at Mr4 Smith's role. At a previousmeeting he, represented only fifteen taxpayers. of the area who emotionally objected to the proposal made. Now, to his surprise this minority has swayed the entire civic association. Speaking for himself as a citizen, as well as a planning commissioner, he feels that if the commission votes affirmatively on this petition that they will be serving the best interests of the area and of the entire city. He urged that the commission unanimously recommend this rezoning petition. Mr. Ward further stated that he is sorry that the people in the civic association do not feel that the Planning Commission is trying to do what is right. Their efforts have been honest and sincere, Many hours have been devotedto this area and he feels that the Planning Commission will be doing the right thing by recommending the industrial expansion in this area in conformance with the study that has been previously prepared by the Commission. 4912 Mr. Walker stated that he wished to make some facts clear; first that this entire study has been going on for eight years inthe Planning Depart- ment of the City of Livonia and only in the last two years has the City had a staff where it could do a comprehensive and a real fine study of the area, and only after revising zoning requirements was the new zoning brought about known as M-L; which zoning was made for this area; the Commission feels it a highly desirable zoning and, having a Master Plan of the entire area, that this development fits in well with it. He further stated that the Commission does not feel that this is an isolated, hodgeS . podge development with no continuity in the over-all plan, they feel it is an asset to the welfare of the community as a whole; but feel that there are other things involved, that some things do not look quite right to the Commission because it has spent so much time with the public and the civic association and had drawn down to where they were almost fn complete accord with the President, Secretary and the two other members cirthe association at a meeting lasting to midnight on Thursday, September 1, 1966, and something happened between Thursday and Sunday whereby fourteen people chose to hire an attor>ey, and by the following week the entire civic association decided to hire an attorney to represent them, and the position was made clear to the board that they do not desire any type of industry in the area; that their desire was for 1/2-acre lots of residential zoning; therefore I feel that the board has no other choice but to go ahead with their plan. The Commission has a master plan which they must adhere to and if they are going to benefit the City as Planners, he stated, this petition is the best possible and most desirable use to the City as a whole. On a motion by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Moser, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-144-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on August 9, 1966 on Petition 66-6-1-15 submitted by Naldo Bucci for Rocwall Company requesting to rezone property located on the east side of Osmus Avenue approximately 175 feet north of Fargo Avenue in Section 3 from RUFA to M-L as proper extension of existing land use on the south side of Eight Mile Road, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-6-1-15 be approved for the following reasons: (1) it is a logical extension of existing use to the north and will be compatible transition with the adjacent development; (2) it is consistent with the over-all industrial plan adopted and modified by the Planning Commission; (3) it is consistent with the Master Plan of the City; (4) this proposed rezoning will increase the economic stability of the City; (5) this proposed land will not tax the existing community facilities of the area; A 491 3 i 4 FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published ' in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer and City Post, under date of July 20, 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell'Telephone Company and' Consumers Power Company, petitioner, and City Departments, as listed on the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition ' 66-6-1-16 by Stanley B. Friedman for Borman Food Stores, Inc. requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Deering, approximately 400 feet south of Eight Mile Road in Section 1 from RUF to C-2 to drake zoning consistent with the property abutting to the west, north and east of subject property. Upon motion duly made by Mr, Ward and seconded by Mr. Wrightman, the follow- ing resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-145-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on August 9, 1966 on Petition 66-6-1-16 as submitted by Stanley B. Friedman for Borman Food Stores, Inc. requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Deering, approximately 400 feet south of Eight Mile Road in Section 1 from RUF to C-2 to make zoning consistent with property abutting to the west, north and east of subject property, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-6-1-16 be approved, for the following reasons: (1) it is a logical expansion of thaexisting zoning which is necessary to create a desirable shopping area; (2) it is consistent with the Planning Commission's over-all Commercial Master Plan; FURTHER RESOLVED that notice of theabove public hearing was published' in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer and City Post, under date of July 20, 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell 'Telephone Company and Consumers Power Company, petitioner, and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution : adopted. 4914 Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 66-7-2-16 by Grand River Avenue Baptist Church requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to use the property located on the north side of Six Mile'Road between Farmington Road and Burns Drive (private"street), (a portion of parcel 09E3), for church' purposes, including construction of necessary facilities. Upon motion by Mrs. Chandler, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-146-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on August 9, 1966 on Petition 66-7-2-16 as submitted by Grand River Avenue Baptist Church requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to use the property located on the north side of Six Mile Road between Farmington Road and Burns Drive (private street) (parcel 09E3), in the southwest 1/4 of Section 9, the City Planning Commission does hereby re- commend to the City Council that only a portion of the area in the waiver use petition, No. 66-7-2-16, be granted, that area being described as follows: e Limited to a 400, x 800, rectangle located in te the southeasterly corner of the property petitioned for; said rectangle having 400 feet of frontage along Six Mile Road and 800 feet of depth north from the north right-of-way line of Six Mile Road for the following reasons: (1) because of the size, shape and location, it will not be detrimental to the adjacent development; (2) it fits into the logical solution for the development of this entire area; FtRTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above palic hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is a letter from Bruce W. Polozker requiting a one-year extension for Kingsbury Heights Subdivision No. 3 located in the Northwest 1/4 L{ of Section 17 based on plan which was approved on 8/24/65 by City Planning Commission (#8-140-65) 4915 0 On motion by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Wrightman the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-147-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a request dated August 5, 1966 from BRUCE W. POLOZKER for a one-year extension of the' preliminary plat for Kingsbury Heights, Subdivision #3, located in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant said request for the following reason: (1) the subdivision is of sufficient calibre to justify the Commission's continued sanction; Section 6.07(2), Subdivision Rules and Regulations stated "The tentative approval will be valid for a period of one (1) year from the date of the approving resolution unless the subdivider applies for and obtains an extension of such period". Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is final plat approval of Baloh Subdivision located in the Southeast 1/4 t of Section 32. On motion by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Heusted, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-148-66 RESOLVED that, the final plat of Baloh Subdivision, located in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 32, be given final approval subject to the following condition: (1) that all financial obligations be met in accordance with the requirements set forth in Council Resolution #456-65; for the following- reason: (1) it is consistent with the previously approved preliminary plat; FURTHER RESOLVED, inasmuch as it appears on the records that tentative approval was given by the City Planning Commission under resolution 8-145-64, adopted on August 4, 1964; and it further appearing that said proposed plat together with plans and specifications for improvements therein have been approved by the Department of Public Works, under date of April 13, 1965; LILand it further appearing that the financial assurances Till have been filed with the City Clerk prior to City Council acti^n, as 4916 required by Council Resolution #456-65 adopted May 5, 1965 the City Clerk is hereby requested to so notify the Building Department when all conditions necessary to the release of building permits have been met. Mr, Walker, .Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted, . Mr, Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is the architectural approval of elevations to be used in construction of a nursing center on parcels 24W1s and 24W1b located on the east side of Middlebelt Road approximately 1600 feet south of Five Mile Road in Section 24. (Petition 66-6-2-13) On motion by Mr. Wr ightman, seconded by Mr. Pollock, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-149-66 RESOLVED, that pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution #8-127-66 adopted August 9, 1966, the petitioner, Rev. Lyle Adams, President of Middlebelt Nursing Centre, Inc, has submitted the necessary documentation and information requested therein regarding Petition 66-6-2-13 for a waiver use permit to erect and operate a nursing centre on parcels 24Wla and 24W1b located on the east side of Mtddlebelt Road approximately 1600 feet south of Five Mile Road in Section 24, and the City Planning Commission hereby grants architectural approval based on plans submitted, Mr. Walker, Chairman,, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is the final approval of Burton Hollow Estates Subdivision No. 6 located in the west 1/2 of Section 16, Mr, Hull stated that the plat is in order from physical standpoint; all financial obligations to the City have been met and it is consistent with the previously approved preliminary plat. He further stated that Mr,Meizinger hashed a quit claim deed signed by Slavik Builders covering land within the flood plains of this subdivision and all other subdivisions they have de- veloped in this section of the City. Mr. Hull suggested that the deed be held until the plat is recorded, at which time the deed should be transmitted to Council for recording, At that time the Slaviks will have developed all the land they own in this area of the City and the City will have possession of all flood plain lands originally owned by the developers. The land will be dedicated to the City of Livonia for public use excepting parks and recreation, a 4917 On motion by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Heusted, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-150-66 RESOLVED that, the final plat of Burton Hollow Estates #6, (formerly Burton Hollow Estates No. 5) located in the west 1/2 of Section 16 be given final approval for the following reasons: (1) that all financial obligations with the City have been met; (2) it is consistent with the previously approved preliminary plat; FURTHER RESOLVED, that inasmuch as it appears on the records that tentative approval of said proposed plat was given by the City Planning Commission under resolution 12-227-62 adopted on December 4, 1962; and it further appearing that said proposed plat together with plans and specifications for improvements therein have'been approved by the Department of Public Works on October 18, 1965; and it further appearing that financial assurances have been filed with the City Clerk pursuant to Council Resolution 1044-65 adopted November 3, 1965 as confirmed by letter dated September 6, 1966 from Addison W. Bacon, City Clerk, it would therefore appear that all the conditions necessary to the release of building permits have been met and the Building Department is hereby so notified. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is a motion by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to a request from the Industrial Development Commission (Resolution 142-6-66) to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Part I of the Master Plan, the Master Thoroughfare Plan, to provide for an internal road in the North 1/2 of Section 27. On motion by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Ward, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-151-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia on its own motion and pursuant to a request from the Industrial Development Commission as set out in resolution #142-6-66 does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held in the City Hall of the City cf Livonia, to determine whether or not to amend Part I of the MNter Plan . , 4918 of the City of Livonia, the Master Thoroughfare Plan, to provide for an east-west road between Farmington Road and Merriman Road in the North 1/2 of Section 27; the proposed east-west road to be located approximately 900-1200 feet south of Schoolcraft Road ; FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the time and place of said public hearing be published in a newspaper of general circula- tion in the City of Livonia and that a notice by registered mail be sent to each public utility and railroad within the City of Livonia in accordance with the provisions of Act 207 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1921, as amended. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is a motion by the ' City Planning Commission, pursuant to a request dated June 27, 1966 from the Industrial Development Coordinator, to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Part I of the Master Plan, the Master Thoroughfare Plan, to provide for the removal of all interior roads in the south 1/2 of Section 27 from the Master Thoroughfare Plan. On Motion made by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Ward, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-152-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia on its own motion and pursuant to a request from the Industrial Development Commission dated June 27, 1966, does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held in the City - '11 of the City of Livonia, to determine whether or not to amend Part I of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master Thorough- fare Plan, to remove all interior roads in the South 1/2 of Section 27 from the Master Thoroughfare Plan; IT IS FLRTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the time and place of said public hearing be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Livonia and that a notice by registered mail be sent to each public utility and railroad within the City of Livonia in accordance with the'provision of Act 207 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1921 , as amended. 1 Mr, Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is a motion by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to rezone property west of the property covered by waiver use petition #66-7-2-15 from RUF to P.S. in Section 33. 4919 On motion by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Tent, the following resolutionwas unanimously adopted: #9-153-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 23,01 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, No.' 543, as amended, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to rezone Parcel 33Tlal located north of Ann Arbor Trail approximately 800,• west of.Wayue Road .in Section 33 from RUF to P.S.; FURTHER RESOLVED that a hearing be held and notice be given as provided in Section 23.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 543 of the City of Livonia and that there shall be a report submitted and recommendation thereon to the City Council. Mr., Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is resolution trans- mitting an amendment to the Gas and Oil Wells Ordinance to the City Council, On motion by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Tent, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-154-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on March 29, 1966 on Petition 66-2-6-2 assubmitted by the City Planning Commission pursuant to Council Resolution #877-65, to determine whether or not to amend Ordinance #543 (City of Livonia Zoning Ordinance) by adding two sections to Article XVIII (Oil and Gas Wells and Storage of Oil, Natural Gas and other Highly Flammable Products), the City Planning Commission ' does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 66-2-6-2, as amended, be approved for the following reasons: (1) the proposed ordinance permits greater flexibility but still vests control within the hands of the City govern- ment; FURTHER RESOLVED.,that notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonian Observer and City Post, under date of March 9, 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and Consumers Power Company, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. r 1 4920 li Mr, Walker announced that the next item on the agenda was a motion by the Planning Commission, on its own motion, to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Section 18.38(5) of Ordiname No. 543, the City of Livonia Zoning Ordinance, by providing for one (1) parking space for each three (3) beds rather than two (2) beds, Mr. Hull advised that this was not brought about by Mr; Phipps but that it came about as a result of a discussion with Mr. Phipps, further stating that the request was that of the Mayor. On motion by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-155-66 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission pursuant to ' Section 23.01 of the City of Livonia Zoning Ordinance, No.543, as amended, does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to amend sub- section 5 of Section 18.38 of Ordinance No, 543, the City of Livonia Zoning Ordinance, to provide for one (1) parking space for each three (3) beds in lieu of each two (2) beds; FURTHER RESOLVED, that a hearing be held and that notice be given as provided in Section 23.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No, 543, of the City of Livonia and that there shall i:: be a report submitted and recommendation thereon to the City Council. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda was a motion by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to rezone lots 29a2, 29b; 29al, 30a1; 30a2, located on the east side of Osmus north of the property covered by Petition 66-6-1-15 from RUFA to M-L On motion by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Ward, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: #9-156-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 23.01 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, No. 543, as amended, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether nr not to rezone lots 29a2, 29b, 29a1, 30a1; 30a2, located on the east side of Osmus from RUFA to M-L; FURTHER RESOLVED that a hearing be held and notice be given as provided in Section 23.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 4 4921 No, 543 of the City of Livonia, as amended, and that there shall be a report submitted and recommendation thereon to the City Council. Mr,, Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted, Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda was a motion by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to rezone a portion of parcels 01B2 and O1C1 located on the west side of Deering Avenue approximately 320 feet south of Eight Mile Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 1 from RUF to C-2 On motion by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Ward, the following resolution was utt-nimously adopted: #9-157-66 RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 23,01 of the City of Livonia Zoning Ordinance, No. 543, as amended, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to rezone parcels 01B2 and O1C1 located on the west side of Deering Avenue approximately 320 feet south of Eight Mile Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 1 from RUF to C-2; FURTHER RESOLVED that a hearing be held and notice be given as provided in Section 23.01 of the City of Livonia Zoning Ordinance, No, 543, as amended, and that there shall be a report submitted and recommendation thereon to the City Council, Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the resolution adopted. Mr. Walker announced that the next item on the agenda is the adoption of the September and October meeting schedule of the City Planning Commission. The schedule of meetings for the months of September and October, 1966, was discussed and approved by the Commission. On motion by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Ward, and unanimously adopted, the City Planning Commission adjourned the 225th Special Meeting held on September 6, 1966 at approximately 12 midnight. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Harry Wrigh =n, Secy( ary Attest: • d 0-. /1/44/ Charles W. Walker, Chairman