Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1968-04-23 5305 MINIUM OF THE 192nd REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, April 23, 1968, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, held its 192nd Regular Meeting and a Public Hearing at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Charles W. Walker, Chairman, called the Public Hearing to order at approximately 8:30 p.m. with approximately 35 interested persons in the audience. Members present: Charles W. Walker Donald Pollock Harry Wrightman Donald Heusted Raymond W. Tent Members absent: Marvin Moser Myra Chandler Messrs. Don Hull, Planning Director; Ralph H. Bakewell, Planner III; H. G. Shane, Planner II, and David Perry, Assistant City Attorney, were present. Mr. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 68-3-2-3 by Pure Oil Division, Union Oil Company of California, requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to build a gasoline service station on the northeast corner of Seven Mile and Newburgh in Section 5. Mr. Ralph P. Miller, Jr. , Division Real Estate Representative, and Mr. V. C. Mooney, Field Construction Manager, were present representing the petitioner. Mr. Tent stated that in areas where gas stations have occupied 2 or 3 corners at an intersection, there are presently many vacant ones and question Mr. Miller as to what they planned that was different in order to keep the station in business. Mr. Mooney stated that none of the stations that are out of business are Pure stations, and that this is actually a transfer of an existing station. He stated that Pure stations are sprdad out and enable people to make a living in this City and they feel it is a new marketing area. Mr. Pollock stated that it has been found that when gas stations are of minimum design and the operator goes out of business, it becomes a burden on the community and has a deteriorating effect on the neighborhood. Mr. Wrightman questioned if they discontinue a station do they sell it to someone else for the same business. Mr. Miller stated they have restrictions regarding this but sometimes they are used for other businesses. Mr. Mooney stated they are sometimes used for real estate offices, cleaners, drive- in restaurants, etc. Mr. Miller showed plans to the Commissioners of stations located at Seven Mile and Inkster and Seven Mile and Middlebelt, and a site plan of the proposed station. Discussion was held regarding the proposed station and site plan by the petitioners, and Commission. 5306 Mr. Wrightman questioned how many Pure stations there are in the City. Mr. Mooney replied, about six. 1 There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition. Mr. Walker, Chairman, stated the item will be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 68-2-2-2 by John F. Dooley, Attorney for William V. Titus and John Giacobozzi, requesting to be granted a waiver of use permit to erect a gasoline service station on the northeast corner of Haggerty Road and Six Mile in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 7. Mr. Walker advised that a letter had been received from Mr. Dooley stating that he was not able to attend the public hearing this evening and requesting that the Commission withhold action on this petition until he is able to appear. Mr. Walker stated that results of a study made by the Commission indicated that this station may be moved to another location and advised that the petition will be taken under advisement. There was no one present wishing to be heard regarding this petition. Mr. Walker, Chairman, stated the item will be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 68-3-1-7 by L Rodney C. Kropf, Attorney for Helen Meining requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Farmington Road, north of Schoolcraft Road in Section 21, from R-2 to R-7. Mr. Rodney C. Kropf, Attorney for the petitioner, was present and stated that this petitioner owns this property which at one time received favorable action by the Planning Commission for C-2 zoning for a K-Mart but was denied by the Council in view of the fact that so many of the people in the area objected. He stated that the site has been looked at by architects and it is felt that it is good property for multi-family zoning, and that he can put a high-class development to those present. Mr. Wrightman questioned how many acres and units are involved. Mr. Kropf stated there are 11.54 acres and about 120 units are proposed. He stated that the plan submitted to the Commission is similar to what he proposes to build here, with no three-bedroom units. Mr. Tent advised that this area may be made a part of the Center City area and that there are other considerations for the property. Mr. Pollock questioned if the lights and noise from the Field would bother the tenants of an apartment. Mr. Kropf stated that Mr. Volk will be the architect if the zoning is approved by the City although the developer is not yet known and that it is felt they will be able to screen the apartments from the lights and sound proof the units. 5307 The President of Kimberly Oaks Civic Association was present and stated that the (10 Association opposed multi-family zoning a few years ago. He stated the Association would like to see this property developed in some way but they do not want a K-Mart; they would like the civic center development or an extension of Ford Field. Mr. Alden Sawyer, 14028 Stamford, requested information regarding the general development plans for this area, Mr. Hull, Planning Director, stated that the Planning Department has envisioned that this land would best be Used in a combination of uses rather than one; perhaps some professional office, additional park, single family residential and limited commercial. He stated that tie type of commercial would be specifically to serve the residents of the area rather than the residents of the region. Mr. Hull advised that two studies have been made to date and the Department would like to complete a third. Mr. Walker stated that there is another petition before the Commission which involves property at Schoolcraft and Stark Road and it has been decided the Commission will have to make a study of the area to determine the development of the civic center area. He stated that the Commission is awaiting a decision from the Council regarding their preference regarding the development of the area, including this site. The Planning Commission will then know what position they want to take with this petition and what would be offered to the petitioner in the future. Mr. Kropf requested to know how long this would take. Mr. Walker stated he believed that within about four to six weeks the Commission should have a fair indication as to the planned development of the total area. Mr. Kropf stated that seemed reasonable. There was no one else wishing to be heard regarding this petition. Mr. Walker, Chairman, stated the item will be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 68-3-3-7 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion, to vacate that portion of Lyndon Avenue located between Eckles Road and Bassett Avenue in Section 19. Mr. Hull advised the Commission that this petition is related to the imple- mentation and effectuation of the overall plan for Section 19. He stated that the new Plat Act means that vacations would have to go to Circuit Court and by that time the State would have consummated their action. On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously adopted, it was 5308 #4-44-68 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on April 23, 1968 on Petition 68-3-3-7 as submitted by the City Plan- ning Commission on its own motion, to vacate that portion of Lyn- ; t don Avenue located between Eckles Road and Bassett Avenue in Sec- tion 19, the City Planning Commission does hereby withdraw Petition 68-3-3-7 for the following reason: (1) The new requirements by the State Subdivision Control Act negates the need for this action. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer under date of March 20, 1968, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Heusted, seconded by Mr. Pollock, and unanimously adopted, it was #4-44a-68 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the Public Hearing held on Tuesday, April 23, 1968, at approxi- mately 9:30 p.m. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mr. Walker, Chairman, called the 192nd adjourned Regular Meeting to order at approximately 9:31 p.m. with approximately the same number of interested per- sons in the audience as were present for the public hearing. Mr. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 68-3-2-3 by Pure Oil Division, Union Oil Company of California, requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to building a gasoline service station on the northeast corner of Seven Mile and Newburgh in Section 5. On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously adopted, it was #4-45-68 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on April 23, 1968 on Petition 68-3-2-3 as submitted by Pure Oil Division, Union Oil Company of California, requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to build a gasoline service station on the northeast corner of Seven Mile and Newburgh in Section 5, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 68-3-2-3 be denied for the following reasons: (1) The proposed use would not be in harmony and appropriate with the orderly development of the surrounding area, (2) The location and size of the proposed use, the nature and intensity of the principal use and accessory uses, the site layout and its relationship to streets giving access, shall be such that the traffic to andfrom the use and assembly of persons in conjunction with the use, will be hazardous and inconvenient to the area and will unduly conflict with the normal traffic of the area. 5309 I: (3) The location of the building and its accessories will be such that the proposed use will have a detrimental effect l upon the neighboring property and the neighboring area in general. It may impair the value of the neighboring property and discourage the appropriate development and use of the adjacent land or building. (4) This petition conflicts with the philosophy of the master plan for the northwest sector of the City. (5) This petition is in violation with a proposed ordinance amend- ment which would require greater distance between service stations. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 68-2-2-2 by John F. Dooley, Attorney for William V. Titus and John Giacobozzi, requesting to be granted a waiver of use permit to erect a gasoline service station on the northeast corner of Haggerty Road and Six Mile in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 7. LI Mr. Walker, Chairman, stated that in view of the request dated April 9, 1968 from Mr. Dooley that this item be withheld, the Commission will take the matter under advisement until such time as Mr. Dooley is able to be present. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 68-3-1-7 by Rodney C. Kropf, Attorney for Helen Meining requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Farmington Road, north of Schoolcraft Road in Section 21, from R-2 to R-7. Mr. Walker questioned if it is Mr. Kropf's desire that the Commission hold this item until a study has been made of the area with the hope that this petition and three or four others can be related to the study. Mr. Kropf stated that that would be fine. Mr. Tent questioned what Mr. Kropf's attitude toward adjusting his petition if a modification is necessary and will he be willing to compromise with the master plan if it is neaded. Mr. Kropf stated he can wait until the study is made and if it is reasonable he will go along with it, but he stated, he does not believe P.S. is reasonable and he understands the residents do not want commercial. Mr. Walker stated this item will be taken under advisement. 5310 Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 68-3-3-7 was withdrawn during the course and the public hearing and that the next item to be taken up at this time is Petition 68-1-2-1 by G. Mayer requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to install automatic auto-wash equipment and add on to existing building located on the north side of Schoolcraft between Eckles and Hix Roads in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 19. Mr. Walker referred to a letter dated April 3, 1968 from the Engineering Divi- sion regarding the water problem in this area. Mr. Mayer stated he had talked with the Engineering Division and was told that they felt this use would not be a real problem because of the small quantity of water they would take out. Mr. Wrightman stated he agreed about the amount of water that is going to be used in the area, but the homeowners in the area should be given consideration. . He questioned if there are any plans for improving the water source there. Mr. Hull stated he knows of no plans and that a few years ago the situation was very bad and according to the Engineering Division, who is the authority, there is a problem. Mt. Mayer stated that the automatics could be discontinued during June and July because a lot of people are on vacation and wash their own cars. Mr. .Wrightman questioned how the City could be sure that he would do this. Mr. Mayer stated that if he doesn't have the proper water pressure he can't operate and if he closes down for four or five week-ends out of the year, there will be no great loss. Mr. Tent stated that a new owner, if Mr. Mayer ever sold the business, may not be willing to do this, and in view of the letter from the Engineering Division, he is not in favor of this use. Mr. Pollock stated there is an objection from the Police Department regarding the lining up of cars waiting to get in. Mr.. Mayer stated he has purchased an additional 150' behind the station for these cars and there is room for 250 cars off the street. Mr. Pollock questioned if it is the Commission's responsibility to worry about the water problem. Mr. Hull stated the Commission should get something from the Engineering Divi- sion as to whether there is a solution to the water problem._ Mr. Mayer suggested that he could erect storage tanks for low pressure periods. Mr. Tent stated that at the time of the public hearing the residents of the area stated they have a water pressure problem existing there now and the City Depart- ments say there is a problem, and if storage tanks were built he doesn't -believe the Commission would be doing the people in the area a service at all. Mr. Pollock questioned why it should be the Commission's jurisdiction regarding water when a man wants to go into business and, since Hygrade is putting a burden on the same system, is the Commission going to tell them they can't open? 5311 Mr. Wrightman stated his belief that this man should be given equal rights in the use of his property. Mr. Hull stated this man has the right to use his land in any of the other uses permitted under the zoning. Mr. Tent stated that the people in the area should be considered also, and that at the time of the hearing they stated they have a problem to the extent that they cannot even water their grass in the summer. Mr. Pollock suggested that Mr. Mayer be given an opportunity to go back to the Engineering Department for something more factual. Mr. Walker questioned Mr. Pollock as to whether he would still consider voting under the advice of the Engineering Division if it is referred back to them and if they give the same answer. Mr. Pollock stated that if they say definitely there is not enough water to operate an auto wash in this area he will not override the Engineering Division. Mr. Wrightman stated that he would also like to know what provisions will be made for future development in this area regarding water supply and also Hygrade's development. Mr. Pollock stated there are small industrial plants going in along there and questioned where will they get their water. He suggested that the Commission get together with the Water Department andd find oLt where they stand. Mr. Tent stated he is satisfied with the Engineering Division's report and he would vote against the petition on that basis. There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition. Mr. Walker, Chairman, stated the item will be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-12-1-40 by Joseph B. Monaco requesting to rezone property located at the northeast corner of Farmington Road and Lyndon Avenue in Section 22, from RUF to P.S. for construction of a nursing home, convalescent home, professional center or a high-rise office building. Mr. Walker stated that the Commission has been over this matter quite a few times and he believed the petitioner is interested in a resolution based on his plan. Mr. Tent questioned if Mr. Bruce Duke, representing the petitioner, is in disagreement with the Planning Commission's plan for this. Mr. Duke stated he has an alternate plan to show the Commission. Mr. Tent questioned if this isn't the plan he showed the Commission at the last study meeting. Mr. Duke replied, yes, it is. Mr. Walker stated that the Commission feels they just can't afford this much professional use in this area. 5312 Mr. Duke and members in the audience who live in Kimberly Oaks Subdivision viewed and discussed the plans made by the Planning Commission and Mr. Duke's plan. Mr. Hull stated that this is a very large quantity of P.S. zoning and it is the obligation of the Planning Commission to make sure it will be compatible with the existing residential development. Mr, Duke stated he does not agree with the plan made by the Planning Department and that he prefers his own. Discussion was held by the Commission and residents of Kimberly Oaks with the petitioner regarding the plans. Mr. Walker stated that the Commission has attempted to resolve this with a plan for some professional use and another use for the balance of the land that would go along with the master plan. He stated that P. S. zoning was created to be a transitional use between commercial and residential property and that there is a hugh medical complex on Plymouth and Farmington Road and Mr. Pastor's development on Schoolcraft and Hubbard. Mr. Walker pointed out that the objection is not to P.S. zoning but to the quantity of P.S. zoning here. Mr. Duke asked what the difference in quantity between the two plans is. Mr. Hull stated the Planning Department's plan covers probably only about one- third of the area, Mr. Duke stated he feels the people in the area will believe this would be an asset. On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously adopted, it was #4-46-68 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on January 25, 1966 on Petition 65-12-1-40 as submitted by Joseph B% Monaco requesting to rezone.property located at the northeast corner of Farmington Road and Lyndon Avenue in Section 22, from RUF to P.S. for construction of a nursing home, convalescent home, professional center or a high-rise office building, the City Plan- ning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 65-12-1-40 be denied for the following reasons: (1) A large quantity of professional service in this sector of the City could adversely effect the stability of the adjacent residential neighborhood. (2) The logical transition between land uses should take place along back, rather than front, lot lines. (3) This plan is in conflict with the Commission's development plans for the Center City area. (4) This is an excessive quantity of professional service zoning to grant in this sector of our City. 5313 (5) The proposed site plans indicate that adequate development solutions are difficult to achieve on this parcel of land. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer under date of January 5, 1966, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mt. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 67-6-2-11 by Robert L. Tipton for Kenwood Church of Christ requesting a waiver use permit to build a church on property located on the east side of Merriman Road approximately 330 feet north of Fargo in Section 2. Mr, Hull stated that 4.7 acres are involved in this petition. The matter, he stated, was before the Commission before and the Commission requested to see a detailed architectural plan and the petitioner has complied with the request; he may, however, be required to have eight more parking spaces which should be included before submittal of the Commission's resolution to Council. Mr. Tent questioned if Mr. Tipton would agree to make the revision if it is requested after interpretation by the Inspection Department has been received. Mr. Tipton stated that they are agreeable to make the revision if necessary. On a motion duly made by Mr. Pollock, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unani- mously adopted, it was #4-47-68 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on August 15, 1967 on Petition 67-6-2-11 as submitted by Robert L. Tipton for Kenwood Church of Christ requesting a waiver use permit to build a church on property located on the east side of Merriman Road approximately 330 feet north of Fargo in Section 2, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 67-6-2-11 be approved for the following reasons: (1) There is a need for this type of facility in this sector of the City. (2) It is a logical transition in land use between the multi- family zoning and the existing residential neighborhood to the south. (3) The thoroughfares in this area are capable of handling the increased volume of traffic. (4) The site is large enough to accommodate the proposed development and its logical expansion. 5314 FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. ' Mr. Walker, Chairman, stated the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is a letter dated March 11, 1968 from Willard E. Lockwood requesting an extension of his waiver use approval to operate a fruit market on the west 1/2 of Lot 6 and all of Lot 7 of Barton's Newburgh Sub- division situated on the north side of Ann Arbor Trail between Newburgh Road and Horton Avenue in Section 31. (Petition 66-4-2-9) On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously adopted it was $4-48-68 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a request dated March 11, 1968 from Willard E. Lockwood requesting an extension of his waiver use (Petition 66-4-2-9) approval to operate a fruit market on the west 1/2 of Lot 6 and all of Lot 7 of Horton's Newburgh Sub- division situated on the north Side of Ann Arbor Trail between Newburgh Road and Horton Avenin in Section 31, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to grant an extension for a period of one year, such approbal to expire on June 20, 1969, for the following reason: (1) This is a transitional use and allows the owner to make use of his property prior to the time that it will be converted to permanent commercial use. Mr. Walker, Chairman, stated the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 67-12-2-23 by Leo R. Burton requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to operate a Class "C" liquor establishment on parcel 28EE2bc located on the west side of Farmington Road, north of Plymouth Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28. Mr. Tent raised the question of decorative lights that were agreed upon at the last meeting, and if an approving resolution could be held until the petitioner brings in a set of lights that are aesthetically acceptable to the Commission. Mr. Burton stated that he would be happy to put in the type of lights that the Commission feels are needed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously adopted, it was • 5315 #4-49-68 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on April 23, 1968 on Petition 67-12-2-23 as submitted by Leo R, Burton requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to operate a Class "C" liquor establishment on parcel 28EE2bc located on the west side of Farmington Road, north of Plymouth Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 67-12-2-23 be approved based on submittal of plans for a set of lights that are acceptable to the Planning Commission with the following conditions: (1) That the approval is hereby granted on the basis that the approved Site and Landscape Plan #S-68-10 will be adhered to and implemented by the petitioner within one year after issuance of the building permit. (2) That the structure will be constructed in conformance with Architectural Plan No. 216, submitted by the petitioner. for the following reabohs: (1) It conforms to all the ordinances of the City of Livonia. (2) The site is large eholigh to accommodate this specific use and any logical expansion, FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. 41[ l Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 68-1-1-3 by Edna and Jess Ziegler requesting to rezone property located at the northeast corner of Farmington Road and Pickford in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10, from R-1 to P.S. On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Heusted, and unanimously adopted, it was #4-50-68 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on March 19, 1968 on Petition 68-1-1-3 as submitted by Edna and Jess Ziegler requesting to rezone property located at the northeast corner of Farmington Road and Pickford in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10, from R-1 to P.S. , the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 68-1-1-3 be denied for the following reasons: (1) The encroachment of P.S. and commercial zoning along mile roads interferes with their primary function of carrying large volumes of traffic and tends to cause a hazardous condition due to numerous points of vehicular ingress and egress. (2) It is extremely difficult to get quality professional service development on parcels of land that are less than 200' in depth. 5316 (3) This proposed rezoning would constitute an encroachment into an existing residential neighborhood. (4) There are great quantities of vacant P.S. zoned land Li4 within the City. (5) This proposed zoning is in colflict with the Planning Commission's master plan for commercial and professional service development. FURTHER RESOLVED that, Notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of February 28, 1968, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Cotpany, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company Michigan gel1 Telephone Company, CohsUmers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carriedand the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is the final plat approval of Westland Industrial Subdivision located on the north side of Plymouth Road, east of Farmington Road, in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27. On a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Pollock, and unanimously adopted, it was #4-53-68 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that the final plat of Westland Industrial Subdivision, located on the north side of Plymouth Road, east of Farmington Road, in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, be given approval for the following reasons: (1) It is consistent with the previously approved preliminary plat. (2) All the financial obligations of the City have been met. FURTHER RESOLVED, inasmuch as it appears on the records that tentative approval of said proposed plat was given by the City Planning Commission under Resolution #12-183-66 adopted on December 6, 1966; and it further appearing that said proposed plat together with plans and specifications for improvements therein have been approved the Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, under date of April 3, 1967; and it further appearing that the financial assurances required in Council Resolution #442-67 adopted May 1, 1967, have been filed with the City Clerk as confirmed by a letter dated April 16, 1968 from Addison W. Bacon, City Clerk, it would therefore appear that all the conditions necessary to the release of building permits have been met and the Building Department is hereby so notifed. Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman, seconded by Mr. Pollock, and unani- mously adopted, it was 5317 ##4-52-68 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the meeting held by the City Planning Commission on February 20, 1968 are hereby approved. On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Heusted, and unanimously adopted, the City Planning Commission adjourned its 192nd adjourned Regular Meeting held on April 23, 1968 at approximately 11:00 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION /i '4W/ / Harry Wright n, Secr-$ :ry ATTEST: 'LL) (/a Gi(/ Char s W. Walker, Chairman Li/