Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1972-02-08 9406 MINUTES OF THE 238th REGULAR MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, February 8, 1972, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, held its 238th Regular Meeting and a Public Hearing at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Daniel Andrew, Chairman called the Public Hearing to order at approximately 8:10 p.m. with approximately 25 interested persons in the audience. Members present: Daniel R. Andrew David F. Merrion Suzanne Taylor Joseph Talbot Joseph Falk Charles Pinto Francis M. Hand Members absent: H. Dow Tunis (out of town business) Herman Kluver (illness) Messrs. John J. Nagy, Planning Director; Ralph H. Bakewell, Planner IV; H. G. Shane, Planner IV; and Robert M. Feinberg, Assistant City Attorney were also present. Mrs. Taylor, Acting Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda Petition 71-12-2-37 by Lindhout Associates requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to erect a new church facility on property located on the north side of Five Mile Road between Harrison and Garden in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13. Mr. Lindhout was present and advised the Commission that they propose to remove the two houses that exist on the property now, one house initially and the other some five years later. Mr. Andrew advised Mr. Lindhout that his associate was present at the study meeting the week before and the Commission indicated their desire to have this site again reviewed in two years. His associate had stated that within three years the rear lot would be blacktopped. Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Lindhout whether this was reasonable in his opinion? Mr. Lindhout stated that the church would be amenable to this. Mr. Andrew stated that the other area of concern was landscape planting in Section #2 which is the immediate rear parking area. This was to be installed within one year. Mr. Lindhout thought this was quite difficult to commit the owner to at this time. Mr. Andrew pointed out that the rear parking area had six planting islands and he felt that the islands should go in immediately. 9407 Mr. Hand asked Mr. Lindhout whether in conjunction with the paving, if the L Commission would allow three years for paving would this give ; them more time and could they guarantee that the paving and landscaping go in at that time? Mr. Lindhout stated that he thought the landscape was a modest plan because of money. There was no one in the audience wishing to be heard on this item and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted it was #2-38-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on February 8, 1972 on Petition 71-12-2-37 as submitted by Lindhout Associates requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to erect new church facility on property located on the north side of Five Mile Road between Harrison and Garden in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-12-2-37 be approved for the following reasons: (1) All of the specific requirements and regulations provided for these facilities have been complied with. (2) The proposed use is compatible to and in harmony with the surrounding uses of the area. with the following conditions: (1) That the Site Plan prepared by Lindhout Associates identified as 7007, revised 2/1/72, shall be adhered to. (2) That the building elevations as shown on the architectural rendering by Lindhout Associates shall be adhered to. (3) That the site shall be landscaped as shown on the landscape plan submitted by Pride Landscape Company dated 1/15/72. (4) All landscaping as shown on the approved landscape plan for Sections I and III shall be installed before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (5) The landscaping proposed for Section II shall be installed within 3 years after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy unless a further extension of time is granted by the Planning Commission. I • 9408 (6) The residential structure remaining on the site shall be removed within a three-year period from the date of this approval unless a further extension of time is granted by the Planning Commission. (7) The parking lot surface shall be hard surfaced within a three year period from the date of this approval unless a further extension of time is granted by the Planning Commission. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-12-1-72 by Edmund J. Hebda requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Purlingbrook between Eight Mile Road and Pembroke in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, from RUF to R-4. Mr. Hebda was present and advised the Commission that he intended to either sell or build on the property and to divide these lots to create two 90' x 137' lots which would conform to R-4 zoning. Mrs. Virginia Carpenter, 20244 Milburn was present and stated that she lives south of this site and that the Civic Association has no objection. Mrs . Sullivan, 20308 Milburn was present and stated that she had no objection to the rezoning. There was no one else in_ the audience wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Talbot, seconded by Mr. Pinto and adopted it was ##2-39-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on February 8, 1972 on Petition 71-12-1-72 as submitted by Edmund J. Hebda requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Purlingbrook between Eight Mile Road and Pembroke in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, from RUF to R-4, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-12-1-72 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The rezoning will allow for two lots to be developed which will be compatible to the abutting residential lots. (2) The proposed rezoning will provide for a reasonable transition with respect to the surrounding zoning and land use density. (3) The proposed rezoning will provide for the reasonable use and development of property platted on the basis of R-1 regulations within an RUF zoning district. 9409 FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing * ) was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, IL under date of January 19, 1972 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Merrion, Pinto, Talbot, Taylor, Andrew NAYS: Falk, Hand ABSENT: Tunis, Kluver The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor read the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-12-1-73 by Robert W. Mayer requesting to rezone property located south of Plymouth Road, west of Farmington Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, from RUF to P. Mr. Lindhout was present . Mrs. Taylor asked Mr. Lindhout what the set back was. Mr. Lindhout stated that it will be a building approximatley 50 wide x 100 long. ✓ The set back is the same as the existing building. Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Lindhout about the fact that this building was going to be used for a rental hall. Mr. Lindhout stated that the petitioner would not use it for a rental hall. Mr. Merrion wondered whetherthis should be considered for parking when the Commission had not received any firm plans for the use of this building. Mr. Andrew stated that is one avenue of approach to the question. Mr. Pinto stated that if this petition was tabled then the builder of the building would have to build a protective wall, probably in a spot the builder obviously would not want to build. If there is a future addition, I cannot conceive what other or probable classification we could have other than parking. If we leave it RUF a protective wall will be built isolating it to the rear. I certainly do not want to see commercial there. I do not think a park site will be built there. Mr. Hand asked whether Mr. Lindhout knew what the petitioner wanted to do with the front part of the building. Mr. Lindhout stated that unfortunately they did not. He further stated that they had discouraged him on the principal of a meeting hall. Anything that IL would go in would be in accordance with the C-2 uses and available parking for that land. Mr. Andrew asked whether Mr. Mayer was in the audience. Mr. Lindhout stated that he was out of town and would be for an extended amount of time. 4910 Mr. Merrion stated he felt that by zoning this rear portion of land to parking it would be extending the commercial aspect of this land and he feels there is too much vacant commercial on Plymouth Road already. There was no one else wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion to table the petition duly made by Mr. Merrion failed because of lack of support. On a motion duly made by Mr. Pinto, seconded by Mr. Talbot and adopted it was ##2-40-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on February 8, 1972 on Petition 71-12-1-73 as submitted by Robert W. Mayer requesting to rezone property located on the south side of Plymouth Road, west of Farmington Road in the Northeast 1 /4 of Section 33, from RUF to P, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-12-1-73 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The proposed rezoning will eliminate two non- compatible zoning classifications existing on one parcel of land. (2) The proposed rezoning will provide for uses that are compatible to the surrounding uses of the area. (3) The proposed rezoning will provide for the full utilization and development potential of the property. (4) The proposed zoning classification will provide for parking uses needed within the area. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of January 19, 1972 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Falk, Pinto, Talbot, Taylor, Hand, Andrew NAYS: Merrion ABSENT: Tunis, Kluver The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. 4911 Mrs. Taylor read the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-12-1-74 by Roger and Rosette Ajluni requesting to rezone property located on the south side of Curtis Road, east of Farmington Road in the 1L; Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, from RUF to P and P.S. Mr. Lindhout was present and stated that Dr. Ajluni wants to put another building on this site. Mr. Barth was present and was representing the maTi building houses on Shadyside. The builder of this property will abut this parking area. Egress and ingress should be on Farmington Road and not allowed on Curtis at all. Mr. Hand stated he failed to understand Mr. Barth's concern since at this point only parking will go into this "L" shape portion and it would be screened from curbs. Mr. Barth stated that when you bild $40,000 homes that people tend to ask what is going in all around their homes. Mr. Barth asked whether there were any plans for improving Curtis. Mr. Nagy stated that drainage is to be installed in summer of 1972 and the paving will follow sometime after. Mr. Andrew stated there would be no improvement of Curtis until the sewers were in. 111:09 There was no one else present wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted. it was #2-41-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on February 8, 1972. on Petition 71-12-1-74 by Roger and Rosette Ajluni requesting to rezone property located on the south side of Curtis Road, east of Farmington Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, from RUF to P and P.S. , the City Planning Commission does hereby reconm end to the City Council that Petition 71-12-1-74 be approved for the following reasons : (1) It is a logical extension of the existing zoning pattern within the area. (2) The proposed zoning change will provide for uses that will be compatible to and in harmony with the surrounding uses of the area. (3) Professional service zoning will provide for a transitional zone separating the residential development to the north from the nonresidential and institutional uses to the south. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of January 19, 1972 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, 4912 Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-12-1-75 by James Tringali requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Cardwell between Wadsworth and Plymouth Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 25, from R-1 to P. Mr. Nagy read a letter from the Engineering Department which is on file. Mr. Tringali was present. Mr. Talbot asked Mr. Tringali if he were using two lots now. Mr. Tringali stated he was and that there was an appeal pending in front of the Zoning Board of Appeals for waiver of the required protective wall. Mrs. Buckner , 11659 Cardwell, was present and stated that she lives north of property. They have three lots and alley for parking now, they do not need any more. If they put this wall there it would be 3 feet from her window. She further stated that the wall should have been put up one year ago. The parking lots they already have have not been taken care of like it should have been. It is used for hot rodding and other disturbances. Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Tringali if the two lots he was using were fenced. Mr. Tringali stated they were open. Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Tringali whether they could fence and landscape and erect wall around these three lots so that they could effectively control the use of these lots while not being used for business. Mr. Tringali stated he thought they could be. He further stated that he did not feel that this was a problem. Mr. Andrew stated that a resident was being annoyed by use of lot during after hours. Mr. Hand asked Mr. Tringali if the third lot was put into use would the wall that would be required be three feet away from Mrs. Buner's window. Mr. Tringali stated that it could be. Mr. Hand asked whether Mr. Tringali must put the wall on the property line. What could be done to give relief. Mr. Andrew stated that he could voluntarily shift the fence and/or wall to the south. Mr Pinto asked whether he could do this legally. Mr. Andrew stated that the Engineering Department would determine the location of the wall. Mr. Nagy read clarification of that law -- to be constructed on easement 4913 line or lot line but if it will effect hardship or other circumstances exist then this can be modified. li; Mrs. Jenewick, 12010 Cavell was present and stated that she had submitted a petition of property owners of Cardwell opposing rezoning. Mrs. Taylor asked Mr. Tringali if he had any plans to build on area zoned M-1. Mr. Tringali stated he did not. It was intended for parking. Mrs. Taylor asked Mr. Nagy whether they needed the additional parking. Mr. Nagy stated that during the day apparently not but this is not the peak hours of their operation. He stated that the problem was that this is a 40 ft. lot and not consistent with the R-1 zoning requirements. Mr. Pinto asked Mr. Tringali how he felt about putting up a wall three feet from the lady's window. Mr. Tringali stated that maybe they could put up rosebushes. Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Tringali whether he felt they needed the extra parking. Mr. Tringali stated that he thought so. Mrs. Jenewick stated that she has been there many times and does not feel that they need the extra parking. She also stated that Mrs . Buckner's bedroom window was the one in question near this wall. Also, Mrs. Buckner's husband is a cardiac patient. There was no one else present wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Falk, seconded by Mr. Hand and adopted it was #2-42-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on February 8, 1972 on Petition 71-12-1-75 by James Tringali requesting to rezone property located on the west side of Cardwell between Wadsworth and Plymouth Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 25, from R-1 to P, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to table this item to the February 15, study meeting. A roll call vote resulted in the following: AYES: Falk, Merrion, Pinto, Talbot, Taylor, Hand NAYS: Andrew ABSENT: Tunis, Kluver The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 72-1-6-1 by the City Planning Commission to amend Section 20.01 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, by adding regulations for a new district titled Planned Residential Developments and Planned General Development. 4914 ILThere was no one present wishing to be heard on this item and the Chairman IL declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Falk and unanimously adopted it was #2-43-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on February 8, 1972 on Petition 72-1-6-1 as submitted by the City Planning Commission to amend Section 20.01 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, by adding regulations for a new district titled Planned Residential Developments and Planned General Development, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 27-1-6-1 be approved for the following reasons: (1) This is a necessary tool to accommodate large-scale creative development. (2) This is a necessary tool to provide for flexibility in the development of small scale and awkward parcels of land. (3) The proposed ordinance vests maximum freedom, creativity and imagination in the hands of the land developer and maximum control in the hands of the City. (4) This is another needed tool to regulate the orderly growth and development of lands within the City of Livonia. IL, FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of January 19, 1972 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 72-1-6-2 by the City Planning Commission to amend Article XVIII of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, by repealing Sections 18.55, 18.56 and 18.57 and by amending Section 18.47 so as to include the regulations pertaining to control of development in all vicinity control areas. There was no one present wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Pinto, seconded by Mr. Falk and unanimously adopted it was • 4915 #2-44-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on February 8, 1972 on Petition 72-1-6-2 as submitted by the City Planning Commission to amend Article XVIII of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, by repealing Sections 18.55, 18.56 and 18.57 and by amending Section 18.47 so as to include the regulations pertaining to control of development in all vicinity control areas, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 72-1-6-2 be approved for the following reasons: (1) This is a needed tool to provide for greater control of development within certain designated areas. (2) This proposed amendment will consolidate the four designated areas and a proposed fifth into a single vicinity control ordinance. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of January 19, 1972 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. The Chairman declared a short recess at 9:40 p.m.; the public hearings having been concluded. The meeting was reconvened at approximately 9:50 p.m with all members present as were present for the initial roll call. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-10-1-66 by W. L. Baron for American Oil Company to rezone property located at the northwest corner of Newburgh and Joy Roads in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31, from C-1 to C-2. On a motion duly made by Mr. Talbot, seconded by Mr. Hand and unanimously adopted it was #2-45-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on December 7, 1971 on Petition 71-10-1-66 as submitted by W. L. Baron for American Oil Company to rezone property located at the Northwest corner of Newburgh and Joy Roads in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31, from C-1 to C-2, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-10-1-66 be denied for the following reasons: (1) A development of this intensity in this sector of City could adversely affect the stability of the adjacent development. (2) The proposed zoning classification would be detrimental to and discourage the orderly and appropriate development of the surrounding area. 4916 \.. (3) The condition of Joy Road and Newburgh Road is such that the development of a highly intensified commercial establishment could overburden the existing hazardous traffic conditions. (4) The need for the proposed commercial service facilities in this sector of the City has already been adequately met and there is no need to provide for additional facilities in this location. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of November 17, 1971 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-10-3-8 by Mr. and Mrs . L. C. Jessup requesting to vacate a six-foot easement located on the north property line of Lot 31g108 on the east side of Knolson Avenue between Orangelawn and Richland in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31. On a motion duly made by Mr. Merrion, seconded by Mr. Falk and unanimously adopted it was #2-46-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 11, 1972 on Petition 71-10-3-8 as submitted by Mr. and Mrs. L. C. Jessup, 9750 Knolson Avenue, Livonia 48150, requesting to vacate a six-foot easement located on the north property line of Lot 31g108 on the east side of Knolson Avenue between Orange- lawn and Richland in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-10-3-8 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The City Departments and utility companies have indicated there is no need to retain the easement. (2) There are no existing utilities located within the easement. (3) Vacating the easement will allow the property owner to have full use of his property and improve his property by erecting an enclosed garage thereon. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of December 22, 1971 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and ILO City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. 4917 The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-12-1-71 by Michael Vorgitch to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Knolson and Ann Arbor Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31, from C-1 to C-2. On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand seconded by Mr. Falk and unanimously adopted it was ##2-47-7.2 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 11, 1972 on Petition 71-12-1-71 as submitted by Michael. Vorgitch, 38645 Ann Arbor Road, Livonia 49150, requesting to rezone property located at the southeast corner of Knolson and Ann Arbor Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31, from C-1 to C-2, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that Petition 71-12-1-71 be denied for the following reasons: (1) The proposed change in zoning would be detrimental to the nearby permitted uses of the area and would tend to disrupt the stability of the neighboring residential properties. (2) The intensity of use as permitted under C-2 zoning could adversely affect the stability of the adjacent residential development. IL; (3) The intensity of use created by C-2 zoning would generate additional traffic which would tend to overload the existing roads within the area, particularly Knolson Avenue which is a residential street and all ingress and egress to the site will be from Knolson Avenue. (4) C-2 zoning generally makes provision for more intensified commercial uses. The increase and influx of traffic into this area and onto Knolson Avenue could cause a serious safety problem because Knolson Avenue is inadequate to handle it and the influx of commercial traffic would also have an adverse effect upon the stability of the existing residential neighborhoods located immediately to the south. (5) The needs of the residents of the area are presently being adequately serviced by the existing commercial facilities. There is no need to expand the general commercial development at the intensity of use permitted under C-2 zoning to satisfy the needs of Livonia's residents in this sector of the City. (6) Within this general location of the City there exists a school and park playground which generates pedestrian traffic flow into these facilities which could be adversely affected by high intensity and large volumes of transient traffic that cannot be properly conveyed on the existing pavements within the area. 4918 FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of December 22, 1971 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Mlchigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-10-7-11 by • the City Planning Commission to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School & Park Plan, so as to incorporate property located north of Five Mile Road, west of Newburgh Road immediately adjacent to Blue Grass Farms Sub- division in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 18. On a motion duly made by Mr. Merrion, seconded by Mrs. Taylor and adopted it was #2-48-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, having duly held a Public Hearing on December 14, 1971 for the purpose of amending Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, entitled the Master School and Park Plan, the same is hereby amended so as to incorporate property located north of Five Mile Road, west of Newburgh Road immediately adjacent to Blue Grass Farms Sub- division in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 18, being legally described as follows: That part of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 18, T. 1 S. , R. 9 E. , described as beginning at a point on the N & S 1/4 Section line distant S. 0° 27' 46" E, 329 .41 ft. from the center 1/4 corner of Sec. 18 and proceeding thence S. 0° 27' 46" E. along said line, 329.41 ft. ; thence N. 89° 41' 30" E. 750 ft. ; thence N. 0° 27' 46" W, 329.60 ft. ; thence S. 89° 40' 51" W. , 750 ft. to the point of beginning. 5.68 acres. for the following reasons : (1) The City of Livonia Parks & Recreation Commission recommends that this parcel be placed on the Master School & Park Plan. (2) The proposed park site will tie together two existing park sites, thereby creating better pedestrian traffic flow through and between the park lands . AND, having given property notice of such hearing as required by Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission does hereby adopt said amendment as part of the Master School and Park Plan of the City of Livonia which is incorporated herein by reference, the same having been adopted by resolution of the City Planning Commission with all amendments thereto, and further that this amendment shall be filed with the 4919 City Council, City Clerk and the City Planning Commission and a certified copy shall also be forwarded to the Register of Deeds for the County of Wayne for recording. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES Merrion, Pinto, Talbot, Taylor NAYS: Falk, Hand, Andrew ABSENT: Tunis, Kluver The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning Commission to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Sections 27.05 and 27.06, R-8 District Regulations and Sections 29 .04 and 29.05, R-9 District Regulations, so as to increase the allowable_ densities . On a motion duly made by Mr. Pinto, seconded by Mr. Hand and unanimously adopted it was #2-49-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 23.01(a) of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to amend Sections 27.05 and 27.06, R-8 District Regulations, and Section 29 .04 and 29.05 R-9 District Regulations, so as to increase the allowable densities. FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of time and place of said public hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circu- lation in the City of Livonia and a notice by registered United States mail shall be sent to each public utility or railroad company owning or operating any public utility or railroad within the City of Livonia in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931, as amended. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning Commission to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to incorporate Tax Parcel 05J located north of Seven Mile Road, west of Wayne Road if extended, in the east 1/2 of Section 5. On a motion duly made by Mr. Pinto, seconded by Mr. Talbot, and unanimously adopted it was #2-50-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to incorporate Tax Parcel 05.1 located north of Seven Mile Road, west of Wayne Road if extended, in the East 1/2 of Section S. 4920 FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of time and place of said public hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circu- lation in the City of Livonia and a notice by registered United States mail shall be sent to each public utility or railroad company owning or operating any public utility or railroad within the City of Livonia in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931, as amended. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to vacate the portion of Shadyside Avenue located south of Five Mile Road, east of Farmington Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22. On a motion duly made by Mr. Pinto, seconded by Mr. Hand and unanimously adopted it was #2-51-72 RESOLVEDTHAT, pursuant to Ordinance #9, as amended by Ordinance #50, of the City of Livonia, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that ? public hearing be held to determine whether or not to vacate the portion of Shadyside Avenue located south of Five Mile Road, east of Farmington Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of time and place of said public hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Livonia and a notice by registered United States mail shall be sent to each public utility or railroad within the City of Livonia in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931, as amended. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning Commission initiated by Council Resolution #59-72 requesting the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to rezone property located at the northeast corner of Levan and Schoolcraft Roads from C-1 to P.S. On a motion duly made by Mr. Falk, seconded by Mr. Talbot and unanimously adopted it was #2-52-72 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 23.01(a) of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, and pursuant to Council Resolution #59-72, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to rezone property located at the northeast corner of Levan and Schoolcraft Roads in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 20, from C-1 to P.S. 4921 FURTHER RESOLVED that, a hearing be held and notice be given as provided in Section 23.05 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended, and that there shall be a report submitted and recommendation thereon to the City Council. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted it was #2-53-72 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the meeting held by the City Planning Commission on December 7, 1971 are approved. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resoltition adopted. Mrs. Taylor announced the next item on the agenda approval of the meeting held by the City Planning Commission on January 11, 1972. On A motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted it was #2-54-72 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the meeting held by the City Planning Commission on January 11, 1972, are approved. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Merrion and unanimously adopted, the City of Livonia Planning Commission adjourned its 238th Regular Meeting held on February 8, 1972 at approximately 10:10 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Suzanne Taylor, Acting Secretary ATTESTED: L.cJ. 7,.. feele°21-- Daniel 7Andrew, Chairman