Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1981-12-15 7601 • MINUTES OF THE 424th REGULAR MEETING • AND PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 4 LIVONIA 3 On Tuesday, December 15, 1981, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, held its 424th Regular Meeting and Public Hearings in the Livonia City Hall, 33000 Civic Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman, called the Regular Meeting and Public Hearings to order at 8:00 p.m. , with approximately 20 interested people in the audience. Members Present: Herman Kluver Joseph Falk Judith Scurto Sue Sobolewski Daniel R. Andrew Lee Morrow Donald Vyhnalek Jerome Zimmer Donna Naidow Messrs. John J. Nagy, City Planning Director; H G Shane, Assistant City Planning Director; and Ralph H. Bakewell, Planner IV, were also present. Mr. Andrew then informed the audience that if a petition on tonight's agenda involves a rezoning request, this Commission only makes a recommendation to the City Council tho in turn will then hold their own Public Hearing and decide the- question. If a petition involvesa waiver use request, and the petition is denied by the Planning Commission, the petitioner then has ten days in which to appeal for relief. Otherwise the petition is terminated. Mr. Falk, Secretary announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 81-11-2-25 by the Livonia Public Schools requesting waiver use approval to establish office use within an existing building located on the north side of Munger, west of Middlebelt Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14. Mr. Nagy: There is no correspondence in connection with this matter. tan Ron Campeau: I represent the Livonia Board of Education. We would like to use this 15221 Knolson facility for a teachers' union office. Mr. Andrew: Is the permanent shed for the trash new? Mr. Campeau: That is an existing part of the building and is attached to the building. Mr. Andrew: The proposed new landscaping if it were to be installed by June 1, 1982, will that be a problem? Mr. Campeau: June 1 is no problem. Mrs. Scurto: Do you intend to use that western driveway? In other words, people would drive in the east and out the west. Mr. Campeau: I assume so. It was used in the past. There is a concern among the area residents as to teenagers meeting in the back parking lot. We thought of a barrier on one of the parking entrances. Mrs. Scurto: I would like to see a "no right' turn" coming out of either driveway. lieMr. Campeau: That is no problem. Mr. Zimmer: For my clarification you will have "no right turn" at both driveways. 4. 7602 Mr. Campeau: Yes. The eastern driveway is narrow. If a delivery truck were to have to get to theloading dock eastern driveway might not be wide enough. I: Mr. Zimmer: How many people will be at this operation and what are the hours of operation? Mr. Campeau: Our hours are from 9 to 5. The staff will consist of two professional employees, two secretaries and myself. I will be on an irregular basis. Mr. Andrew: Will there by any night meetings? Mr. Campeau: There will be a committee meeting, board of directors (about 50) and an organizational meeting (about 75) about once a month. The meetings will be no later than 6 p.m. Mr. Falk: What is the size of your membership? Mr. Campeau: About 1,125. Mr. Falk: Do you have a general membership meeting? Mr. Campeau: This facility could not hold one. We would use one of the high schools. Mr. Zimmer: The meeting once a month is a meeting of an elected group. They represent certain portions of this total membership. Mr. Campeau: That is correct. Each elementary school has one representative, junior high has three representatives, and high schools have seven representatives. 110 4 Mr. Andrew: Will the sign be illuminated? Mr. Campeau: I don't believe so. We haven't given it any thought. It probably will have a wooden cover of shingles. Mr. Andrew: What is the square footage of the sign shown on the plan and does it meet the ordinance? xlr. Nagy: The plan only shows a sign location. There are two existing posts there now. They are indicating location of sign and the intended use of the existing posts. Mr. Vyhnalek: Will there be any change in the parking lot? Mr. Campeau: We will restripe the lines. Mr. Vyhnalek: Will there by any improvement? Mr. Campeau: There will be eventual improvement, some kind of resurfacing at the back part. It holds water. Mr. Vyhnalek: Will the stripes be put in the spring the same time as the shrubs? Mr. Campeau: Yes. 4 Mr. Andrew: Is there anyone in the audinece wishing to be heard on this matter? Chas.Little: We missed the first meeting but we sent a letter. Could this change 29641 Munger someday to a medical center? Mr. _Andrew: The zoning is P.S. Medical suites would be a permitted use. If they 7603 wanted to put in a catering business, they would have to come back to us for a change of zoning. As long as the use stays within the uses 10 of the P.S. , they do not have to come back as long as there is no architectural change. Mr. Little: Doctors and lawyers could go in. Our road is a gravel road. Mr. Andrew: This new use is a much less usage than the former school. Mr. Campeau: There are only four to five of us during normal working hours. Edward Waldo: What is this going to do to our property? 29521 Munger Mr. Andrew: In my opinion nothing. There will be an upgrading of landscpaing and the parking lot. This will be an improvement to the area. Mr. Waldo: The school board does what it pleases. We don't need 80 cars at one time. We don't need all the dust on Munger. Mr. Little: I think it is a good idea to have a "no right turn" (exiting cars then would be going onto Middlebelt instead of west to Six) . There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Mr. Vyhnalek, and unanimously adopted, : it was #12-212-81 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on December 15, 1981 on Petition 81-11-2-25 as submitted by the Livonia Public Schools requesting waiver use approval to establish an office use within an existing building located on the north side of Munger, west of Middlebelt Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 81-11-2-25 be approve( subject to the following conditions: (1) that the Site Plan dated 12/15/81 and signed by Ron Campeau which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; (2) that the site improvements shown on the approved Site Plan which include the restriping of the parking lot, site landscaping and rejuvenation of the existing landscaping shall be completed by June 1, 1982 and thereafter permanently maintained in a healthy condition. (3). that at all the exits from the property a sign shall be placed indicating no right turn allowed. for the following reasons: • (1) The waiver use complies with the P.S.District regulations of Zoning Ordinance #543. Ire (2) The site has the capacity to support the intended use. (3) The proposed use is compatible with surrounding established uses of the area. • - 7604 (4) The proposed use presents a viable alternative use to that of the former educational use of the building exits. 4 FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 81-12-2-26 by Kenneth Soble for Drug Land, Inc. , requesting waiver use approval to utilize an SDD Liquor License within a building proposed to be constructed on the northwest corner of Middlebelt Road and Clarita in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11. Mr. Havis:, I am representing Mr. Soble. He has been in business for 22 years in the 24800 North- City of Livonia. He is presently a pharmacist at the shopping center western High- at Seven and Middlebelt. It is difficult to work with this site. The way size of the building has been dictated by Mr. Soble's complete needs. I have made several revised site plans. I have brought some this evening. I did not have time to put this on final paper. We are planning to screen the dumpster with board and battan. The roof top units would not be screened on three sides. If a screen is required on the west we can screen that. We are going to light this parking lot from our own building. There will be no freestanding pole lights in the parking lot. As far as the landscaping we added additional landscaping by eliminating parking spots. We will have 15 feet of greenbelt off Middlebelt. We did revise the plan thereby eliminating 5 parking spots. We are down to 51 I: spots. We are down to 51 spots instead of 56. We dressed up Clarita and Middlebelt. We have made our entrances more attractive with landscaping We are facing cars to Clarita and not the building. We picked up a 5 foot strip for greenbelt purposes. Mr. Falk: What about the question as to bricking the building? Mr. Havis: The question was raised about brick on the north and west. We are right on the north property line. We have no control over that property. Someone could come in tomorrow and build right up against the brick. We do not know the future of that lot. If we did, and we knew it would not be built on for 10 or 15 years, then brick would be fine. We thought of decorative scored block. They come in 8' x 8' squares. The same treatment would be given to the west. I could talk my client into it if we do not have a choice. The new decorative scored block is very nice. Mr. Falk: I feel brick should be put on the west side. I agree with what you say about the north side. Is 5 feet of greenbelt all we could get. A statement was made in the past about making the building smaller. I have heard no mention of that this evening. Mr. Zimmer: Will there be a wall? Mr. Nagy: A solid masonry wall is required along the west property line only. Mr. Morrow: Is a 5 foot wide greenbelt too narrow to berm? Berming could screen f the cars. Mr. Nagy: It is not enough. Screening will have to be done through plant foliage. Mr. Andrew: The parking on the south side conforms to the new ordinance. -k 7605 Mr. Nagy: Yes. - i Mr. Andrew: How do you plan to screen dumpster? le Mr. Havis: We would screen it on the west by the protective screen wall with a decorative wooden type of battan and board screen. Mr. Andrew: A truck will enter dumpster from the east and pick up trash? Mr. Havis: We will have to use a side load truck. Mr. Andrew: I would like to see the dumpster screened on three sides and I would be inclined to suggest that we continue the use of the same material as the screening wall. Mr. Havis: If on the south side the screening got knocked over, it could be removed easier if it was wooden screening. Mr. Andrew: In my experience when it is wooden and removed it is never put back. Mr. Havis: That will cause us no problem. Mr. Andrew: The decorative block that is being discussed is that what is presently at the building on the northeast corner of Levan and Schoolcraft. Mr. Nagy: Those are tile blocks. 10 Mr. Havis: Those were 16" x 8" in size. We are using 8 x 8 inch squares. Mr. Vyhnalek: Will you use steel posts at the dumpster? Mr. Havis: Yes, 4" x 4" posts. Mr.Vyhnalek: Middlebelt is a Wayne County Road. Do we have correspondence from them? Mr. Nagy: No correspondence back. It usually takes four to six weeks for the County to respond. He has no alternative but to comply to county requirements. Mr. Vyhnalek: Five feet is better than three. I like the amount of area to be landscaped. Mr. Andrew: Does the sign location conform? Mr. Nagy: Yes. Mr. Andrew: Do you plan to have a continous illuminated pylon sign? Mr. Havis: I cannot answer that. That is too premature. Mr. Vhynalek: What about a transformer pad? • Mr. Havis: Yes. I might have to take one car out of the 51. The location is unknown. We are screening that in the same material as the dumpster. Mr. Andrew: Have you had some discussion with Detroit Edison? Mr. Havis: It is a matter of us relocating the poles out of the way of building. 7606 Mr. Andrew: There is no easement involved? • Mr. Havis: No. I Mr. Falk: Do we have clarification from the law department on the 10001 separation? Mr. Nagy: Council has jurisdiction to waive 1,000 foot separation requirement. Mr. Falk: As far as the old drugstore after he moves out and applies for a new SDD there could be two SDD licenses in this general area. Mr. Nagy: Yes. Mr. Andrew: What about screening of air conditioning on roof? Mr. Havis: May I approach you with these plans? Mr. Andrew: What will be the material on the roof? Mr. Havis: All the screening will be consistent. Mrs.K.Vogel: We own a home at 29435 Clarita and an empty lot next door. 27200 Edge- We face this lot. Will there be a greenbelt just on Middlebelt or on more Clarita. Mr. Andrew: There will be a 15 foot greenbelt on Middlebelt and deeper greenbelt at entrances. There will be a green at the corner of Middlebelt and Clarita and 5 feet along Clarita. lo: Mrs. Vogel: We are opposed to an exit on a residential street. We will be able to see cars coming out of the parking lot while sitting in the living room. Mrs. Goula: I represent my brother. If there is an exit on Clarita the traffic 29725 Clarita would be bad on a residential street. The residents are against the exit on Clarita. My brother wants to build a home on his property and now all he will see is cars. Mrs. Vogel: The neighborhood has deterioated enough. Mr. Morrow: Do you live at this home? Mrs. Vogel: We did but we moved to a bigger home. We rent it out until my parents move back into it. Mr. Morrow: He has made a good attempt to come up with a tasteful commercial develop- ment. Commercial is going in there as the property is zoned commercial. Our rule is to get a nice plan. Mr. Andrew: We cannot change the zoning but we understand you are all against an exit on a residential street. Does Art Van have access onto a residential street. Mr. Nagy: No. Mr. Vogel: The parking facing Clarita is not too desirable. ' 7607 Mr. Andrew: Mrs. Goula I note your brother's property is not directly across the street. His property is not that close. We could eliminate the driveway t4ooff Clarita. . Mr. Havis: I think it would be a bad plan to eliminate the driveway. Mr. Andrew: What is the needed width of a greenbelt for any kind of berm? Mr. Nagy: At least 15 feet. Mr. Andrew: You are going to have primary entrance on the south side. Mr. Havis: Yes, one. We will have one entrance in the rear and south. Mr. Andrew: It would be impractical not to have a south entrance when 50% of the parking is on that side. Mr. Havis: At our other store we have one door in the rear and front but that building is half the size of this one. This is an 80 foot wide store here. Mrs. Scurto: Could you eliminate the south entrance and park up to the building, and gain extra landscaping there. Mr. Havis: I think the Fire Marshall would rather have a driveway near the building than parked cars. We need that eouth entrance. Mr. Falk: I note that 49 parking spots are required and 51 are provided. I think we should table this. The site plan was given to us late. The people i have some concern. te Mr. Havis: We would not like to see this tabled. We are looking at other property. Mr. Soble does not have the luxury of time on this property option. We have come down several times. Compromises have been made. There is no 100% perfect solution. This is a nice building. It will be landscaped to the best of our abilities. We have time limits. We still have public hearings before Council and Liquor Commission. We are running out of alternatives. No one is opposed here to the building just the landscaped area. Mr. Falk: At the study, time was not mentioned as being a factor. I cannot be swayed by time. Mrs. Vogel: I have been a resident of Livonia for 33 years. Clarita would have difficulty handling that traffic. The physical condition of Clarita is terrible. There are huge ruts already. K. Soble: Right now I am running my business at an unsightly shopping center. I 29493 W. 7 would like to move into a brand new building. I need the SDD to be Mile Rd. transferred. I am a professional pharmacist. I am not a party store owner. My hours will be 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. I currently have another drugstore in Livonia at Eight Mile and Farmington, Baseline Drugs. I own property in Redford also. • (16W Mr. LawsoN; This is not all night traffic on Clarita. You could prohibit a right / 30600 Tele- turn. Due to the physical condition of Clarita there would be no graph incentive to use Clarita. 7608 Mr. Zimmer: Will there be double occupancy in this building? I Mr. Soble: No. Mr. Zimmer: How will your check out counters be arranged? 3 Mr. Havis: We have not given that thought. We have not had the opportunity to get into minute details. The main entrance will be on the side. In the normal run of business if there are 10 people in the store it is busy. Mrs. Goula: I could get the residents to sign a petition stating no Clarita exit. Mr. Zimmer: There are no commercial exits or entrances on Clarita on the west side of Middlebelt, is that correct? Mrs. Scurto: The road to the east of Middlebelt is that paved? Mr. Nagy: Just to the entrance of shopping center which has ingress & egress to Clarita. • There was no one else wishing to be heard regarding this petition. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Falk, seconded by Mrs. Scurto, it was RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on December 15, 1981 on Petition 81-12-2-26 as submitted by Kenneth Soble for Drug Land, Inc., requesting waiver use approval to utilize an SDD Liquor License within a building proposed to be constructed on the northwest corner of Middlebelt Road and Clarita in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to table Petition 81-12-2-26. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Scurto, Sobolewski, Falk, Andrew NAYS: Kluver, Morrow, Naidow, Vyhnalek, Zimmer ABSENT: None Mr. Andrew Chairman, declared the foregoing resolution is not adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Mr. Kluver, it was #12-213-81 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on December 15, 1981 on Petition 81-12-2-26 as submitted by Kenneth Soble for Drug Land, Inc. , requesting waiver use approval to utilize an SDD Liruor License within a building proposed to be constructed on the northwest corner of Middlebelt Road and Clarita in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 81-12-2-26 be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) That site plan No. 8114 dated Dec. 15, 1981 prepared by Havis-Glovinsky & Associates as revised to accommodate 51 parking spaces is hereby approved and shall be adhered to. • 7609 (2) That the building elevations as shown on the approved site plan are approved and shall be adhered to. (3) That a detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for their review and approval within 30 days from this approval. (4) That the proposed trash dumpster shall be screened on three sides with materials matching the material of the protective screen wall and the enclosure shall be equipped with a gate. (5) That the proposed greenbelt along Clarita Ave. shall be of such material to minimize headlight glare eminating from the parking lot from interferring with the residential equipment of those homes located on the south side of Clarita Ave. (6) That a traffic sign shall be installed at its Clarita Ave. exit prohibiting right turns. (7) That the City Council of the City of Livonia waive the 1,000 feet separation requirement between the site of the existing SDD licensed facility and this proposed location. for the following reasons: (1) The site has the capacity to accommodate the proposed use. The proposed use is compatible to the surrounding and established uses of the area. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A robl call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Morrow, Naidow, Sobolewski, Vyhnalek, Zimmer NAYS: Scurto, Falk, Andrew ABSENT: None Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mr. Morrow, and unanimously adopted, it was #12-214-81 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on December 15, 1981 on Petition 81-11-6-11 by the City Planning Commission to amend Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, relating to regulations for controlling the location of heliports in the City of Livonia, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 81-11-6-11 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The Zoning Ordinance currently'contains no regulations and standards regarding the operation of helicopters. (2) The proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment will provide ample opportunity for the operation of helicopters and location of helicopter support facilities while, at the same time, providing proper zoning regulations therefor. 7610 • FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published 1:: in the official newspaper, the Livonia-Observer, under date of 11/30/81, and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the proof of service. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 81-10-2-23 by Brian Lucid requesting waiver use approval to operate an automobile collision repair facility within an existing building located on the east side of Farmington Road between Schoolcraft and Capital in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28. Mrs. Scurto: Does the wall exist as shown on this rendering? Mr. Nagy: Yes. Mrs. Sobolewski: The shaded area is paved, concrete or asphalt. Mr. Nagy: It is crushed stone and is allowed for two years only, after which time the area must be permanently paved with concrete or asphalt. Mr. Andrew: The privacy fence is 1') feet. Mr. Nagy: Yes, the staff is recommending 8 ft. in height. Mrs. Sobolewski: Additional landscaping? o Mr. Nagy: No, just sod and seeding. ' Mrs. Scurto: Will the 8 foot fence sufficiently reduce the threat of vandalism? 1-10 A 10 foot fence would be hard to scale. Mr. Nagy: Precedent in the ordinance is for 8 feet. There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Sobolewski, seconded by Mrs. Scurto, and unanimously adopted, it was #12-215-81 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on December 15, 1981 on Petition 81-10-2-23 as submitted by Brian Lucid, requesting waiver use approval to operate an automobile collision repair facility within an existing building located on the east side of Farmington Road between School- craft and Capital in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 81-10-2-23 beapproved subject to the following conditions: (1) that the Site Plan, as revised; dated 12/14/81, prepared for Fiji's Custom Coach & Paint which is hereby approved shall beadhered to; IL (2) that the wood fence proposed to screen the trash dumpster and auto storage area shall be limited to 8' in height and shall be stained or painted a color compatible to the existing building and shall thereafter be permanently maintained; 7611 (3) that the driveways and parking areas extending to the rear building line depicted on the approved Site Plan as "paved area" shall be hard surfaced with asphalt or concrete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; (4) that the fenced area and area providing access to it and to the trash dumpster, as depicted on the approved site plan as "shaded area", shall be hard surfaced with asphalt or concrete within two years of the date of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; and (5) that the site area depicted on the approved site plan as "landscaped area" shall be seeded or sodded prior to June 1, 1982 and all landscaping shall be permanently maintained in a healthy condition; for the following reasons: (1) This proposal complies with all of the general standards and special conditions contained in Section 16.11 and 19.06 of Zoning Ordinance #543. (2) The proposed use will be compatible to and in harmony with the adjacent uses in the area. (3) The proposed use will result in substantial upgrading of the property in the form of hard-surface paving, screening and landscaping. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregong resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Morrow and unanimously adopted, it was #12-216-81 RESOLVED that, the City of Livonia Planning Commission hereby expresses its intent to perform the current use inventory authorized by the Michigan Resource Inventory Act (1979 PA 204) . The community agency gives its assurance that it possesses the necessary staff to perform the required work. The community agency agrees that it will abide by the standards and classification system established by the Michigan Inventory Advisory Committee for preparing a current use inventory. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Zimmer, and unanimously adopted, it was #12-217-81 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 23.01)b) of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended, does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to rezone property located north of Five Mile Road on the east side of Hubbard Road in Section 15, from R-1 to RUFA. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of such hearing be given as provided in Section 23.05 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended, and that thereafter there shall be a report and recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. 7612 On a motion duly made by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mrs. Naidow, and unanimously adopted, it was r #12-218-81 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether or not to amend Part VII of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Future Land Use Plan, by changing the designation of the subject properties from the Community Service Classification to more appropriate classification. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of such hearing be given as provided in Section 23.05 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carred and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mrs. Naidow, and unanimously adopted, it was #12-219-81 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931, as amended, to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School and Park Plan, to delete properties located within the City no longer used for school and park purposes. FURTHERIESOLVED that, notice of such hearing be given as provided in Section 23.05 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended, and that thereafter there shall be a report and recommendation submitted to the City Council Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution $ adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Morrow, and unanimously adopted, it was #12-220-81 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Act 285 of the • Public Acts of Michigan of 1931, as amended, to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School and Park Plan, to incorporate certain properties and to delete certain properties located within Section 18. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of such hearing be given as provided in Section 23.05 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mrs. Scurto and adopted, it was #12-221-81 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 423rd Regular Meeting held by the City Planning Commission on November 241 1981, be approved. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: s AYES: Morrow, Scurto, Sobolewski, Vyhnalek, Falk, Zimmer, Andrew NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Naidow, Kluver ABSENT: None 7613 Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution 10 adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Zimmer, and unanimously adopted, it was #12-222-81 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 29.02 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended by Ordinance #774, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 81-2-8-11 by Leo Stein requesting approval of all plans required by Section 29.02 submitted in connection with a proposal to construct a senior citizen retirement apartment building on the west side of Farmington Road between Plymouth Road and Orangelawn in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) that the Site Plan as shown on Sheet A-2, dated 11/17/81, prepared by Leo I. Stein, Architect, which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; (2) that the Building Elevations as shown on Sheet A-5, dated 11/17/81, prepared by Leo I. Stein, Architect, which are hereby approved shall be adhered to; (3) that the Landscape Plan as shown on Sheet L-2, dated 11/17/81, prepared by Leo I. Stein, Architect, which is hereby approved shall 4 be adhered to; and (4) that all landscaping as shown on the approved plan shall be installed on site prior to building occupancy and thereafter maintained in a healthy condition. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mrs. Naidow, and adopted, it was #12-223-81 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the revised site plan submitted in connection with Petition 78-12-8-40 by John D. Divan requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended by Ordinance #990, in connection with a proposal to construct commercial stores on the east side of Middlebelt Road between Orangelawn and West Chicago in Section 36, subject to the following condition: (1) that the trash enclosure shown on the approved Site Plan for Petition 78-12-8-40 shall be of wood construction with gates to match as recommended in plans and specifications prepared by the City Planning Department for construction of trash enclosures. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution 'resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Morrow, Naidow, Sobolewski, Vyhnalek, Falk, Zimmer, Andrew NAYS: Scurto ti ABSENT: None Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. . 7614 On a motion duly made by Mrs. Sobolewski, seconded by Mr. Naidow, and unanimously adopted, it was 10 #12-224-81 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the Revised Site Plan submitted in connection with Petition 80-11-8-24 by John Allie requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to con- struct retail stores on property located south of Norfolk, west of Middlebelt Road in Section 2, subject to the following conditions: (1) that the Revised Site and Landscape Plan dated 12/29/8() for Allie Brothers as prepared by Erwin Hartge, Architect, which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; and (2) that all other conditions as set forth in the original approving Resolution #12-285-80, adopted on 12/16/80, are valid and in full force and effect. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Onmotion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 424th Regular Meeting and Public Hearings held by the City Planning Commission on December 15, 1981 were adjourned at 10:00 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Joseph J. Falk, .'e. retary ,� 7 �,.' ATTEST:t / L/ Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman ��~