HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUBLIC HEARING - 2017-07-19 - SAD WASHINGTON PK
CITY OF LIVONIA
PUBLIC HEARING
Minutes of Meeting Held on Wednesday, July 19, 2017
______________________________________________________________________
A Public Hearing of the Council of the City of Livonia was held at the City Hall
Auditorium on Wednesday, July 19, 2017.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kathleen E. McIntyre, President
Scott Bahr
Maureen Miller Brosnan
Jim Jolly
Brian Meakin
Cathy K. White
MEMBERS ABSENT: Brandon M. Kritzman, Vice President
OTHERS PRESENT: Mark Taormina, Director of Planning
Todd Zilincik, City Engineer
Paul Bernier, Assistant City Attorney
Bonnie J. Murphy, CER-2300, Certified Electronic Recorder
The Public Hearing was called to order at 7:15 p.m. with President Kathleen McIntyre
presiding. This is a Public Hearing relative to the necessity for a proposed Special
Assessment LED Street Lighting Project in the Washington Park Site Condominiums,
located in the southeast ¼ of Section 31, located south of Ann Arbor Road, west of Hix
Road, within the City of Livonia, Wayne County, Michigan.
The City Clerk has mailed notices to those persons owning land in the proposed Special
Assessment District and all other requirements of Section 3.08.110 of the Livonia Code
of Ordinances, as amended, have been fulfilled. The public hearing is now open for
comments. There were eight people in the audience. Please state clearly your name
and address before making your comments.
McIntyre: Mr. Zilincik.
Zilincik: Good evening, Madam President, City Council Members. I just want to
give you a brief history on the assessment conditions for Washington Park
Site Condos. There’s forty-five lots in that development that’s located
again off of Hix and Ann Arbor Road and there will be a proposed eight
streetlights 14-feet tall colonial 73 watt LEDs and again it’s for illumination
in that subdivision in which there would again eight lights and the
anticipated costs would be currently $60.
2
If there are any questions, I’d be happy to answer them but this is being
paid for by the developer and the anticipated costs to them was $28,110
for eight lights. Thank you.
McIntyre: Good evening.
Dixson: My name is Marsha Dixson and I own Lot #28 in Washington Park. So the
developer is going to pay for everything?
Zilincik: Through the Chair, if approved through the process the developer paid for
the installation of the streetlights, the residents would then be responsible
for the electricity costs for the future illumination of the lights divided by the
forty-five lots.
Dixson: Okay. Since I’m the only one here from that subdivision or condominium
site, our association hasn’t even met yet and I think it’s a little premature
to make a decision on this and I prefer that this be taken to the first
homeowner’s association meeting. I just feel it’s premature.
McIntyre: Mr. Meakin.
Meakin: This is just the beginning of a long process, this just determines the
necessity at this point, we’ll have two other opportunities, Mr. Zilincik?
Zilincik: One, the hearing for the roll.
Meakin: So we’ve got some time. I think it’s to your advantage to put the
streetlights in because we require them for every subdivision that we put
in adopted by Council. Streetlights are a safety issue that you’re going to
want.
Dixson: So the builder pays for the install of the street lighting?
Meakin: Yes.
Zilincik: Madam President.
McIntyre: Yes.
Zilincik: Just so you know, obviously there are houses that are being built and will
be occupied very shortly and garbage pick-up and people living in these
resident locations, it does take time to get to DTE and get the information
and get the check and then construction does take place of the poles and
it most likely will be this fall or late this fall, so there is timing issues. But
again, in the best interest, the lots are owned by the developer, he’s aware
of it and just wants to make sure that we move forward with the process
3
and it does take time and the residents then will be responsible for the
electricity once everything is officially approved.
Dixson: Are there other assessments we’ll be paying or just the cost of the
electricity?
McIntyre: For this streetlight assessment it would only be the cost of the electricity,
the developer is paying for the actual installation.
Zilincik: If lights get hit or is burns out or whatever, DTE will take care of the
responsibility of maintenance and replacement of the light if it gets hit.
Dixson: Okay.
McIntyre: Does that help?
Dixson: Yes. Oh, and another question is eight lights enough?
Zilincik: Based on the recommendation of DTE provided to us and the illumination
plan, again based on eight lights and they recommended 73 watt LED 14-
feet tall at the entrances and throughout. We trust, they’ve been doing
lamp poles, they’ve been around for a while so I look to them to
particularly facilitate these types of installations throughout the
subdivisions.
McIntyre: They have models that they use to indicate for safety the right amount of
lights for the number of houses.
Dixson: So to clarify, my only fee is going to be the cost of the electricity for the
LED lighting?
McIntyre: Yes, correct.
Zilincik: I’m not sure once the homeowner’s association sets up, another fee may
be coming forth from that condo document or whatever but I just want to
clarify this is a hearing for the SAD for the street lighting itself, there may
be site fees with the homeowners association with the condo that we may
not be aware of in the future that may take place, so to clarify this is street
lighting only.
Dixson: Okay, thank you.
McIntyre: Thank you.
Bahr: I will offer the approving resolution.
4
Brosnan: To the homeowner who’s here and probably goes back and tells her
neighbors which is going to be fantastic, in looking at the street lighting
plan and design in combination with DTE you were wondering about the
number of lights and whether it would be adequate for the neighborhood,
one of the things that I particularly liked about this design that DTE put
forward was light #9 which extends into the open area, the general more
common area to everybody, and the fact that they looked at lighting that
space in addition to just making sure that the streets were well lit in that
area. So I think that has good placement of it and I think the other thing
you’re going to appreciate is the colonial light, I think the fixture itself is a
lot more attractive than some that we see in neighborhoods, so I think that
it’s going to be something that is not only functionally pleasing but
esthetically pleasing. So our main purpose tonight as was indicated a
number of times is to look at whether or not there is a need for lights in
your neighborhood and the fact that you’ve got a hidden street in that
neighborhood and one street that goes off to the side and everything
coming off of Hix would indicate to me that there is definitely a need for
lighting. That there’s enough distance there that it could get extremely
dark in there and whatever lighting is on Hix is not going to be adequate.
You will hear this issue come back again, a second public hearing is
where we’ll talk about the cost and how that’s allocated. All of the costs
for installation will be borne by your developer and that’s typical of all
subdivisions and also that the homeowners themselves will be responsible
for the ongoing energy costs. And again, one of the good things of this
plan because that’s what we’re talking about tonight, the plan, is that these
are LED lights so they are a little bit lower cost than the ones that were put
in my neighborhood many, many years ago. I think this is actually one of
our better lighting plans that your neighborhood will benefit from it.
Dixson: Thank you.
McIntyre: Thank you very much. And I just wanted to make sure you know that this
item will be on the regular meeting agenda of Wednesday, August 9,
2017.
As there were no further questions or comments, the Public Hearing was declared
closed at 7:24 p.m.
SUSAN M. NASH, CITY CLERK