HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1994-10-18 13708
MINUTES OF THE 692nd REGULAR MEETING
HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LIVONIA
On Tuesday, October 18, 1994, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Livonia held its 692nd Regular Meeting in the Livonia City Hall, 33000 Civic
Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan.
Mr. Jack Engebretson, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Members present: Jack Engebretson James C. McCann Robert Alanskas
Patricia Blomberg William TaPine Daniel Piercecchi
Members absent: R. Lee Morrow
Mr. Engebretson informed the audience that if a petition on tonight's agenda
involves a rezoning request, this Commission only makes a recommendation to the
City Council who, in turn, will hold its awn public hearing and decide the
question. If a petition involves a waiver of use request and the request is
denied, the petitioner has ten days in which to appeal the decision to the City
Council; otherwise the petition is terminated. The Planning Commission holds the
only public hearing on a preliminary plat and/or a vacating petition. Planning
Commission resolutions become effective seven days after the resolutions are
adopted. The Planning Commission has reviewed the petitions upon their filing and
have been furnished by the staff with approving and denying resolutions. The
Commission may use them or not use them depending upon the outcome of the hearing
tonight.
In the absence of Mr. Morrow, Mr. McCann was Acting Secretary.
Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda is the Six
Year Capital Improvement Program 1995-2000.
Mr. Engebretson: John, would you please explain for the audience here and at
home what this is all about.
Mr. Nagy: The Capital Improvement Program is a plan that is part and
parcel to the comprehensive plan of the City of Livonia. It
is a plan of capital expenditures required so the City has a
plan for implementing the Master Plan. It tries to identify
the needed public improvement projects in concert with the
overall Master Plan so that we have the right amount of money
available at the right time that is needed for the process of
implementing our Future Land Use Plan recommendations such as
fire station sites, parks or right-of-way extensions, etc.
Mr. Engebretson: Thank you Mr. Nagy. I might mention that each of us has had a
week to absorb the content of the recommendation and if there
is any discussion, this would be the appropriate time to
address any items you have a question on. If there is no
discussion, a motion would be in order.
13709
On a motion duly made by Mr. IaPine, seconded by Mr. Alanskas and unanimously
approved, it was
#10-176-94 RESOLVED that, the City of Livonia Planning Commission hereby
authorizes the Planning Department to transmit the document titled
"Capital Improvement Program, City of Livonia, 1995-2000" to the
Mayor and Council as a realistic program to aid in the
determination of a complete fiscal planning strategy for the City
of Livonia, and
FURTHER RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission stands ready
to do all things necessary to cooperate with the Mayor and Council
in maintaining a functioning program of capital improvements and
capital budgeting for the City of Livonia.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is
Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Estates
Subdivision located on the Past side of Hubbard Road between Five
and Six Mile Roads in the East 1/2 of Section 15.
Mr. Miller: This is the Camborne Estates Subdivision. It is located south
of Six Mile Road just west of Hubbard Road. It is a developed
subdivision. They are proposing an Entrance Marker to be
located on the left hand side as you drive in off Hubbard.
They are allowed 20 square feet. What the petitioner is
proposing is a 20 square foot sign, five feet in height with a
ten foot setback from the right-of-way, so it is a conforming
Entrance Marker. The Landscape Plan shows that they are
proposing to plant spruce trees behind the signage and
spreading juniper trees along the front.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Piercecchi, seconded by Mrs. Blomberg and
unanimously approved, it was
#10-177-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve
the Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Estates
Subdivision located on the Past side of Hubbard Road between Five
and Six Mile Roads in the East 1/2 of Section 15, subject to the
following condition:
1) That the Entrance Marker and Landscape Plan received by the
Planning Commission on Sept. 10, 1994 by Basney and Smith,
Inc. , is hereby approved and shall be adhered to.
Mr. Engehretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is
Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Pines Subdivision
13710
located south of Six Mile Road between Harrison Avenue and Savoie
in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 13.
Mr. Miller: This is the Camborne Pines Subdivision that is located on the
4rw south side of Six Mile Road just east of Harrison. They are
proposing basically the same sign for this subdivision as for
the previous one. It is 20 square feet, five feet in height.
The setback is ten feet with the same type of landscaping with
spruce trees behind the sign with junipers in front.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Alanskas, seconded by Mr. Piercecchi and
unanimously approved, it was
#10-178-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the
Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Pines Subdivision
located south of Six Mile Road between Harrison Avenue and Savoie
in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 13 subject to the following
condition:
1) That the Entrance Marker and Landscape Plan received by the
Planning Commission on Sept. 10, 1994 by Basney and Smith,
Inc. , is hereby approved and shall be adhered to.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is the
approval of the minutes of the 691st Regular Meeting & Public
Hearings held on October 4, 1994.
On a motion duly made by Mr. TaPine and seconded by Mrs. Blomberg, it was
#10-179-94 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 691st Regular Meeting & Public
Hearinys held by the City Planning Commission on October 4, 1994
are hereby approved.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Alanskas, Blomberg, TaPine, McCann, Piercecchi
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Engebretson
ABSENT: Morrow
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition
94-10-8-23 by Albert Kahn Associates requesting approval of all
plans required by Section 18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in
connection with a proposal to expand St. Mary Hospital located at
36475 Five Mile Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20.
13711
Mr. Miller: This is St. Mary Hospital located on the southwest corner of
Five Mile and Levan. They are proposing to add two additions
to their existing hospital. The first addition will be 55,000
square feet in size and two stories. It will be on the west
*low elevation on what is )mown as the Marian Professional
Building. It will be used for surgical services and maternity
center. The other addition will be located on the Past
elevation of the building and will face out toward Levan Road.
This will be three stories in height and will allow the
emergency center to relocate into that area. There is also a
canopy shown on the site plan which will offer protection from
the circular drive patient drop off in that area. Also, a
structural canopy will be added to the south elevation of the
professional building and will provide protection for the south
entrance. Because these additions are built over the existing
parking, the whole parking lot will have to be redesigned and
in doing so, they will be short on parking. They are supposed
to have 2,306 parking spaces and they will be 867 short, so
they had to go to the Zoning Board prior to coming before the
Planning Commission to receive a variance for the parking
deficiency, which they did receive. They also had a parking
deficiency because this addition here is only two stories in
height and the zoning district PO I requires buildings to be
over two stories and under six. They had to get a variance
for not having enough floors on their building. So they got
that and the parking variance.
Mr. Engebretson: Would the petitioner please come forward and make your
presentation.
fir. Paul Maxwell: I am with Albert Kahn Associates. We reside at 7430 Second
Avenue, Detroit, 48202. As Scott mentioned we have two
primary additions. One is a maternity center on the west
elevation, which is approximately 90,000 square feet, a
basement and two floors, and the overhang on the east side, we
are enclosing that portion of the building and moving the
emergency center to that side of Levan Road. The site plan
was reorganized in order to provide a ring road concept so
that traffic that would come into the hospital campus could
feed into the different areas of the hospital site from the
ring road. It also reduces the number of entrances from Levan
Road from four to two and provides a much smoother traffic
flow for the overall goals of the campus. (He presented a
color rendering of the plan) On the south elevation we are
indicating a new canopy area because in the site planning
concept the idea was to move the primary entrance to the
hospital to the south. There has been some additional parking
added after extensive studies by the hospital as to what their
future needs will be for parking. This site plan is intended
to be three to five years before it is fully developed.
Construction is intended to begin on the buildings this year,
probably mid to late November is the current plan with the
total project being concluded at approximately the end of
1996.
`O.
13712
Mr. Engebretson: How many spaces were added to accommodate all of these new
facilities?
Mr. Maxwell: The existing count is 1229 spaces and we will end up with
`, about 1439, so there were 210 spaces added.
Mr. Engebretson: I understood you to say a moment ago Mr. Maxwell, and perhaps
I misunderstood you, I understood you to say 90,000 square
feet on the two floors in the maternity area at the rear of
the building.
Mr. Maxwell: That is including the basement area. I believe the building
footprint is about 30,000 square feet.
Mr. Engebretson: Our notes indicated 55,000 square feet so 90,000 came as
somewhat of a shock. I guess what I am wondering, when we
calculated parking requirements, would we have used 55,000
square feet or what now appears to be 98,000 square feet,
including the emergency area and 90,000 in the maternity area?
Mr. Maxwell: Actually the zoning ordinance doesn't rely upon square footage
of building for parking calculations for hospitals. For the
existing professional building it does rely on the square
footage but with the existing hospital they rely on the
quantity of beds, projective staff and employee count
including volunteers, so the parking area itself wouldn't be
dependent upon the building area for this facility.
Mr. Engebretson: So it is the professional opinion of yourself and the hospital
Nom. that 210 additional parking spaces will offset any additional
needs arising from the additional space being there?
Mr. Maxwell: Yes we are confident that 210 additional spaces will
accommodate any additional load. I think it is important to
note that the primary purpose of these building additions is
not to add hospital beds or hospital functions. It is to
update what they have already, so even though there is
significant building area added, the actual quantity of beds
licensed by the state will not be increased so the overall
count of employe and staff and patients is expected to go up
some but rather nominal compared to the building addition.
Mr. Engebretson: I understand they have a waiver on this and it is not really
an issue here tonight. You have approval and therefore
everything you are asking for in this respect is permitted.
It is more a matter of curiosity. I am a regular visitor to
that facility and I have found that the parking is usually
fairly tight. There is always parking available but it is
fairly tight, and I am reassured by your comment that this is
not necessarily going to put an additional load on the parking
lot but you have provided some additional spaces for that. I
hope it doesn't get much tighter than it is because it will
soon become a problem.
13713
Mr. Piercecchi: Mr. Nagy, will any of these additions add anything to the tax
rolls?
Mr. Nagy: No.
Mr. T.Pine: Can you tell me how many employe you have on the day shift?
That includes volunteers, paid employe, doctors. What is
the total number?
Mr. Maxwell: I did not bring that information with me. That was available
and it was part of the parking calculations but I apologize
for not having it.
Mr. LaPine: I wanted to have that information, but anyway the other
question I have, you are telling me this addition you are
going to put on, which is either between 47,000 or 90,000
square feet, that is a big addition in my opinion, but you are
telling me that is not going to add any beds. What is all of
this going to be used for? Are the rooms going to be bigger
or are you taking rooms that you have now and developing that
into something else?
Mr. Maxwell: What it is going to be for is the basement area of the west
addition is primarily equipment rooms, mechanical equipment
and that type of thing to service the building. The first
floor will be 20 LDRP rooms, which will be labor, delivery,
postpartum recovery rooms for new mothers, and the second
floor will have eight operating rooms so that will be the
,,`, surgical area with supporting recovery beds and that type of
thing.
Mr. Tapine: Let me ask you this, the new area you said was for the
delivery rooms for the mothers. You must have one of those at
the hospital now. Is that correct?
Mr. Maxwell: Yes.
Mr. LaPine: Are you eliminating that where it is now and moving it to this
new area?
Mr. Maxwell: Yes.
Mr. LaPine: What is going into that area that you are eliminating?
Mr. Maxwell: Presently that space has not been assigned for any function.
Mr. LaPine: You are going to have a new operating room. You have an
operating room now. What is going to happen to that operating
room? Why would you build something new and have something
empty? You have to have some plans of what that area is going
to be used for. Is it going to be used for more beds? What
is it going to be used for?
13714
Dick Kerzic, 6851 Castle Drive, Bloomfield Hills: I am with St. Mary Hospital.
Maybe more of an administrative answer would help you out
here. Hospitals are very specialized buildings, particularly
'Nur the facilities we are talking about for surgery and labor and
delivery recovery. Like automobiles, they grow old and they
wear out and they becomes too small or inproficient in being
able to serve their function for which they were intended.
Technology changes, the delivery of health care changes. As
an example, the LDRPs right now in our existing area we have
standard delivery rooms, which are similar to operating rooms
and they are set up for a traditional delivery service where a
mother comes in and labors, goes to a delivery room, goes to a
recovery room, goes to a postpartum room and then goes home.
We will be going to the single room concept which will allow
us in our 13 LDRP rooms to have the mother and members of the
family come in, labor, delivery, recovery, postpartum all in
the same room. It requires a totally different staffing
pattern. It requires totally different support spaces,
totally different room sizes and different requirements from
the Michigan Department of Public Health in order to engage in
those kinds of services. Our surgeries, for example, those
are about 35 years old now. The technology was different when
they were built. They just don't have the infrastructure to
support the technology of today. Also, surgery is becoming
much more equipment intensive today in order to provide the
kind of services we need to provide. The rooms, as originally
built, did not contemplate the amount of equipment that goes
into a room during the procedure. You have the patient, you
'041110, have the team and you have the equipment. Our rooms simply
are not competitive in the sense we can't put the type of
equipment that we need to put in there with the rest of the
things that are needed for the procedure to accomplish that.
Also, the supporting space with all the different equipment
required for different types of procedures, we have no place
to store it because we don't have equipment rooms large enough
in the vicinity to do that. All of these areas because of
their highly technical nature are very difficult, if not
impossible, to remodel in place while you are providing the
service. To remodel our surgery in place and continue
operations would be impossible, so typically the way it is
done in the hospital field, you build a new service and then
you either have something for the old area or you don't.
There are many, many, many hospitals around the country with
surgical services and LDRP services that are outmoded and sit
empty. An example, those licensed beds that were in the old
maternity area will be transferred down to the new maternity
area so those beds will be taken off-line as far as the state
is concerned as licensed beds, so they cannot be used for beds
for bed growth. The OR rooms will be de-licensed and the new
ones will then have the license to operate.
Mr. TaPine: At a later date you can go back to the state and request
additional rooms. Is that correct?
13715
Mr. Kerzic: We could but the state just is not adding rooms and beds. In
fact, those rooms and beds would be substandard by anybody's
calculations to be used as patient rooms or OR rooms in the
future, and we contemplate not re-using those for medical
`�..
purposes.
Mr. LaPine: I can accept your explanation and it makes sense, but it also
doesn't seem like good business. If you have rooms in a
hospital and they are empty and they are not being utilized,
you are losing money because you have space there. It is like
a business. If you have a machine and it is not working, you
are losing money. It is the same thing in a hospital. If you
have mons that are not being utilized, it has to be costing
you money. I am just curious. Thank you for your
explanation.
Mr. Engebretson: Did you ever say sir whether or not there would be plans to
use that empty space for some other purpose?
Mr. Kerzic: No I can't envision it being used right now. The only thing
you could ever use it for would be some sort of office
function, and actually those kind of facilities and support
services we are decreasing, not increasing, to be competitive.
Mr. Alanskas: In regard to the 210 additional parking spaces, what percent
of those will go to the emergency area for parking because
that is always a problem.
Mr. Maxwell: I am not sure we can give you an exact count. My recollection
is they go from around 40 to 60 spaces.
Mr. Engebretson: I would like to thank Sister Renetta for getting that barbed
wire removed. While I was at the facility yesterday I cruised
around the entire property. I did find a little in front of
the hospice but it looked like it was in the process of being
removed, and I would trust that you have some activity under
way to deal with those signs that were discussed. I would
like to prevail upon your good will for possibly one
additional step regarding that process. I noticed that the
bracket part of the upper post that supported the barbed wire
are still in place and as you drive down the street it gives
the appearance that it still has that kind of structure there,
and I stopped and looked at them and it looks like there are
two bolts that simply need to be removed very, very quickly.
I think the appearance of your facility would be greatly
enhanced. I suspect your professional advisers here would
agree with that, that going out there removing several hundred
bolts would really enhance the appearance. While I don't want
to ask you to commit to doing that, I would think it would be
easy to get some volunteers to do that if your contractors
aren't planning on going back and doing that. Since I live in
the neighborhood I would even be willing to help you do that.
r..
13716
The purpose, as we said earlier is not to be difficult, but to
try to have the facility comply with various codes and
ordinances and to make the best possible impression that we
41101. can. Please take that under consideration. Thank you for the
cooperation. You were able to accomplish some things in very
short order, and we compliment you for that.
On a motion duly made by Mrs. Blomberg and seconded by Alanskas, it was
#10-180-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council that Petition 94-10-8-23 by Albert Kahn
Associates requesting approval of all plans required by Section
18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to
expand St. Mary Hospital located at 36475 Five Mile Road in the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 20, be approved subject to the following
conditions:
1) That the Site Plan, defined as Sheet SRA-1 dated 8/8/94 by
Albert Kahn Associates, is hereby approved and shall be
adhered to;
2) That the Elevation Plans, defined as Sheet SRA-5 & SRA-6 dated
8/8/94 by Albert Kahn Associates, is hereby approved and shall
be adhered to;
3) That the following shall be removed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy permit:
- the barbed wire and support arms located on top of the
chain-link fencing that surrounds the entire Felician
Sisters property;
- all nonconforming signage for the Angela Hospice and the
Marywood Center
4) That all parking spaces shall be double striped.
Mr. LaPine: I am going to be voting against this proposal tonight. Not
that I have any objection to the addition to the hospital but
it seems to me asking for a waiver of 800 parking spaces, and
also asking for a waiver of the width of the parking spaces,
to me that is asking a little too much. I read the minutes of
the Zoning Board of Appeals and my good friends on the Zoning
Board of Appeals must have their reasons for granting the
variance but I don't see anything in their minutes stating why
there was a hardship. There really is no hardship. They have
the land and they could put the parking in. I am not saying
they shouldn't have gotten a waiver on some parking, but
asking for that much parking waiver i, in good conscience, I
just can't compromise the ordinance that much.
Mr. Engebretson: It would have been helpful to have had a better understanding,
but I do understand it is a one year variance and if it does
prove to be inadequate then I do think the Zoning Board has
13717
kept some control over the situation and I would think you
would self monitor in any case. It is a substantial variance
and it is the most significant variance that we have had in
vft. the six to seven years that I have been here.
Mr. Piercecchi: Do I understand it is 1439 spaces plus 210 now?
Mr. Maxwell: No it is 1439 total.
Mr. Engebretson: Then Mr. Piercecchi, to make things more interesting, what you
have to keep in mind, as Mr. Maxwell pointed out, the
ordinance doesn't really require additional space for the
hospital facility per se but while they have provided an
additional 210 spaces there must be some additional activity
planned there. I think if you were to look at this as a
normal office facility, then the deficiency would just be
amazingly large, the worst in the City probably, plus the nine
feet wide, which is also a rare, rare thing. I don't
understand why the nine feet wide.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Alanskas, Blomberg, McCann, Engebretson
NAYS: LaPine, Piercecchi
ABSENT: Morrow
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition
94-10-8-24 by Dorchen/Martin Associates requesting approval of all
plans required by Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in
connection with a proposal to construct an addition to the
McDonald's Restaurant located at 19311 Farmington Road in the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 4.
Mr. Miller: This is the McDonald's Restaurant that is located on the west
side of Farmington Road just north of Seven Mile at the K-Mart
Center. They are proposing to add a 1,000 square foot
playspace addition to the front of their restaurant. This
playspace addition will house a play area with tubular slides
and tunnels kids can crawl through. Because this addition is
built over existing parking, it rendered the site deficient in
parking by five spaces. They went to the Zoning Board prior
to coming before the Planning Commission and were granted a
variance for parking. Based on the variance they meet the
parking requirements for the site. The landscape plan shows
that new landscaping will be planted around the new addition
and the entire site has 38% landscaping where they are
required to have 15%, so they are over what they are required
to have. The elevation shows the new addition will be
constructed out of insulated glass and brick that matches the
13718
existing restaurant. The addition will be 22 feet high, which
is about five feet higher than the existing building. Also,
because the addition will be put on the front of the building,
‘1411. the sign that is there now will be taken down and a new sign
put in its place on the new addition. This facility is
allowed a 36 square foot sign and they are proposing a 32
square foot sign so the sign is conforming.
Mr. Engebretson: Would the petitioner please come down and tell us what you
have in mind.
Paul Hammer: I own the McDonald's at 19311 Farmington Road, Livonia. As
Scott mentioned the design that McDonald's has come out with,
it is a basic design developed over a few years now. I got
feedback from children and from their parents and from other
sources, and I wanted to do this four years ago and couldn't
because I couldn't afford it. My debt ratio was too much.
McDonald's is now allowing me to do this. I took ten days and
went out and got 650 signatures of customers that would like
to have the playspace. For four years I have been hounded
with four to five calls a day with "Do you have playland?",
"No", "Why do we have to go to another location?" My
customers are very excited about it and it is a standard
design that we are putting up. It is found to be very, very
popular.
Mr. Engebretson: Mr. Hammer, we understand from the notes that it will be 22
ft. high and I think Scott mentioned that last week and while
,,`, I wasn't at the meeting last week because I was on vacation, I
understand there was a similar proposal for another McDonald's
and it was proposed to be 30 feet high and if so, I understood
you to say this is a McDonald's plan that is used across the
country, do they have varying heights from store to store and
varying characteristics?
Mr. Hammer: Mr. Martin is here from the architect firm Dorchen/Martin.
Frank Martin, Dorchen/Martin Associates, 29895 Greenfield, Suite 107,
Southfield, 48076: I am surprised at the 30 foot height of a potential
playland. I know our office is involved with six or seven in
the metropolitan area and all of them are under the height of
21'8" and this is about 21'8". I don't know of any that we
are involved with right now that are any higher than that
right now. Unless someone was talking about a pitched roof
unit that we are not involved with where they thought the peak
might be higher, but I don't know of any. Your question of
different heights, McDonald's in their recommended plans that
they progress with and develop, this particular height is one
that has been established by McDonald's. Play equipment sits
underneath this so that it is not too tight up to the roof.
Mr. EngPhretson: This was the store at Five Mile and Middlebelt.
13719
Mr. Martin: I am involved with that store and I can tell you that the
height of that is 21 feet 8 inches.
Mr. Engebretson: I may have misunderstood the information that was given to me
but thank you for clarifying that sir.
Mr. Alanskas: Is there only one entrance for the children to get into
playscape?
Mr. Hammer: What we want to do is keep the playscape separate from the
restaurant so it is quiet in the restaurant, so you would
enter the playscape from the restaurant through a door which
will close. There is one emergency exit.
Mr. Alanskas: But not to go into the street but to go into the playscape.
Mr. Hammier: Correct.
Mr. LaPine: Do you think that Major Magic has drawn any business from you
because you don't have the playspace?
Mr. Hammer: It is difficult to tell right now because I have had road
construction in front of the store in June, July, August and
part of September. I am down $70,000 so I can't tell what is
going on right now. I do get a computer printout every day of
my sales versus last year but there is like a monkey wrench
that has been thrown into it right now.
'4111. Mr. rapine: I can understand. I just wondered if Major Magic had any
impact on your business there.
ON a motion duly made by Mrs. Blomberg, seconded by Mr. Piercecchi and
unanimously approved, it was
#10-181-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council that Petition 94-10-8-24 by Dorchen/Martin
Associates requesting approval of all plans required by Section
18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to
construct an addition to the McDonald's Restaurant located at 19311
Farmington Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4, be approved
subject to the following conditions:
1) That the Site Plan, defined as SP-1 dated 9/30/94, as revised,
by Dorchen/Martin Associates, Inc. , is hereby approved and
shall be adhered to;
2) That the Landscape Plan, defined as Sheet LS-1 dated 6/21/94
by Dorchen/Martin Associates, Inc. , is hereby approved and
shall be adhered to;
13720
3) That the Elevation Plan defined as Sheet A-i dated 9/30/94, as
revised, by Dorchen/Martin Associates, Inc. , is hereby
approved and shall be adhered to;
14111,
4) That the wall sign shown on the approved Elevation Plan is
hereby approved and shall be adhered to.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 692nd Regular
Meeting held on October 18, 1994 was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
J-. C. McCann, Acting Secretary
ATT'ES'T: (14 ��i.46JaEngebrei on, Chairman
*40
jg